Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Poll Poll
Question: Installers or Zip Files



« Created by: Radio Homer on: Mar 28th, 2011 at 1:59pm »

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
How do you like your downloads to be? VOTE HERE (Read 2921 times)
Mar 28th, 2011 at 1:59pm

Radio Homer   Offline
Colonel
B737-800!

Posts: 74
*****
 
Im just wondering what people prefer when they download textures and aircrafts.

do you like them to be in a .zip file so you have to move them to the correct folders or do you like installers that install the texture/aircraft for you??

let me know what you think...
 

Here to help and get help!!!

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 28th, 2011 at 2:52pm

TransportSteve   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
UK

Gender: male
Posts: 25
*****
 
I always prefer zip folders, that way you can see exactly what is inside the folder after you have extracted the contents, something you cannot do with an .exe installer.

Cheerz.  Transport Steve.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 28th, 2011 at 5:42pm

FlexyDemon   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Surinam

Gender: male
Posts: 23
*****
 
Simply Zipped is also the way I prefer.
Beter even is when it is zipped with the following structure:
...
This way, in Windows 7, you can simply copy the contents of the unzipped folder into your FSX root folder and choose Merge. You can than choose if you want to overwrite (for example effect files) files or not.
Only 1 copy action required.
Also the flexibility to change things (labels in aircraft.cfg for instance) before installing.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 28th, 2011 at 6:10pm

Radio Homer   Offline
Colonel
B737-800!

Posts: 74
*****
 
sweet i will keep this in mind next time i upload a texture
 

Here to help and get help!!!

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Apr 1st, 2011 at 10:12am

Groundbound1   Offline
Colonel
No, I don't work for Mythbusters...
Michigan, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1745
*****
 
Pretty conclusive, huh?  Grin

I never trust auto-installers anymore, but I should explain "trust". It's not that I think addon developers are up to no good, it's just that I've spent many years modifying so many of my sims original files that most people would probably never mess with. Autogen files, ground textures, effects files and textures, etc. I hate nothing more than using an auto-installer, and finding out that it has replaced one of my modified files with one included in the newly installed package. (Sadly, I had to learn that lesson the hard way) Now, even if a download has and installer, I'll point it to extract into a temp folder, from which I'll transfer the new files manually. This at least will allow me to say no to any "replace file" warnings. I think you'll find that most simmers prefer this approach. It's nice for developers to try to make the install process easier on the end user, but many times auto-installers just mean more hassle and headache.

And THANK YOU for asking!
 

Specs: Asus Crosshair nForce 590 SLI,
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ w/ZeroTherm BTF90, 
4GB G.Skill PI Series DDR2-800,
Sapphire HD4870 512MB,
PC P&C 750 Quad, in a CoolerMaster HAF932

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Apr 3rd, 2011 at 10:32pm

Boikat   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
NW Loueezianner

Gender: male
Posts: 2978
*****
 
.ZIP all teh way.  (which also mean .rar's get flushed down the bit bucket, too)  I rarely let auto-installers "do their thing".  I prefer to "auto-install" into a temp folder, then manually install, mainly because amy add-ons that are adapted to FSX from FS9 still try to install into FS9.  Needles to say, that don't work very well.
 

...
"I reject your reality, and substitute my own" Adam Savage, Mythbusters
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Apr 3rd, 2011 at 11:33pm

patchz   Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Gender: male
Posts: 10589
*****
 
I too prefer zip files. Auto installers are ok,
IF
(that's a big if, in case you didn't get it Roll Eyes  Grin) they allow you to redirect them to the folder of your choice and then do a manual install.
 

...
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 4:00am

whitley   Offline
Colonel
I am not young enough
to know everything
Buckinghamshire UK

Gender: male
Posts: 72
*****
 
I also prefer to install manually after downloading a ZIP file and if I have to use an installer, I always try to install it into a desktop folder before moving it manually to FSX.

While on the subject of downloads can I just say that I don't like the massive files some developers put together, the ones with perhaps several models, two or three panels and maybe  5 or even 10 different texture folders.

If I wanted all of these variations, I would much prefer to download and install them individually rather than having to download one massive file and then manually remove what I don't want.

I hugely appreciate all of the work that developers, freeware and payware, and would never complain that something is not quite right (OK I have done so twice, once when the plane bounced all over the place when on the runway before crashing, the developer had inadvertently uploaded the wrong air file and once when a payware plane had such bad textures it looked like a Picasso painting and wouldn't fly with force feedback enabled).

Sorry for the rant.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 7:33am

EVVFCX   Offline
Colonel
Been there done it-well
most of it.
Pontefract, West Yorkshire

Gender: male
Posts: 499
*****
 
much prefer a manual install from a zip file, at least if I suddenly get problems I have what's been copied by me and can start trying recover problems, you don't normally see what an auto installer is doing, therefore maybe harder to recover.

regards

Steve

 

May the Mynd be with you.
So far my number of landings either passenger or pilot equal my number of takeoffs, but that is due to change Smiley
13/07/11 Passed BMFA Fixed Wing 'A' test.
FSX Gold
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 9:16am

Daube   Offline
Colonel
Alternative bloomer
Nice (FR)

Gender: male
Posts: 5833
*****
 
ZIP (or RAR) files only.
I hate auto-installers. I HATE THEM, from the very bottom of my heart.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 9:37am

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 

Sad I never use exe compilers ,I much rather to people put things where they supposed to be , I never heard of any complaints about it ,while I heard a lot of trouble by people using auto installations in other airplanes  all the time including here ..

Zip its the King and its wining so far
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 5:26pm

Layne.   Offline
Colonel
Australia, Victoria, Melbourne

Gender: male
Posts: 2654
*****
 
7zip is my preferred  Wink
 

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | 22" LED Monitor (1920x1080) | AMD Phenom II x4 970 Black Edition~3.5Ghz | 4gb RAM | ATI Radeon 6850 1gb | 1Tb HDD

[img]http://www.simviation.com/phpupload/uploads/1302666610.
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 5:46pm

Steve M   Offline
Colonel
Cambridge On.

Gender: male
Posts: 4097
*****
 
Zip it up and send it out.  Cool
 

...
Flying with twins is a lot of fun..
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 6:38pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
I prefer ZIP files as well.  I hate going to my "Remove Program" list to find a couple of dozen aircraft installers listed there.  I also don't like how many auto installers add shortcuts and folders to the Start Menu/Desktop/FS folder.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Apr 4th, 2011 at 9:47pm

BrandonF   Offline
Colonel
The Future of Flight
Location: Earth...Duh!!!!

Gender: male
Posts: 2296
*****
 
I prefer both. It depends on the add-on really. If it's a simple repaint, zip file. An entire airport or add-on fs plugin...exe.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print