Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Payware
›
Payware
› A protest on Active camera 2004
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
A protest on Active camera 2004 (Read 3277 times)
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 4:18am
Moach
Offline
Colonel
Jet-Powered PropellerHead
São Paulo, Brazil
Gender:
Posts: 991
the other day, i was very dissapointed to find that the most indispensable module for fightsim has gone SHAREWARE
and i can't stress this enough, I HAVE NO MEANS OF PAYING FOR IT
and even if i did, i wouldn't because on my country's currency, it would cost me half of what i paid for the game
i'm not totally against shareware, if someone makes an effort to make a software to be sold online, great for him!
but if someone takes something that was free, and begins charging people for it, it's exploitaion
i'm looking for another active camera module (one that's free) or a way to maybe bootleg or crack this one
i'm not trying to corrupt anyone here, it's just that paying for it is absolutely NOT an option for me
believe me, if i could pay for it, i woldn't be asking for help
appreciate any thoughts
Come, one and all aboard! - The Russian Roullete in the sky!
One in each Six of my personalities knows not at all how to fly!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 5:18am
Flight-Captain
Offline
Colonel
James V-1.3
Derby-England
Gender:
Posts: 117
I had exactly the same problem!...I was looking for active camera having already downloaded it for FS2002 and was suprised and disgusted by the "shareware" idea! All we can do now is walk around Seattle!
I would be interested if any other "active cameras" were available, if not just download the demo, copy the code and edit it!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 8:02am
loomex
Offline
Colonel
My 1969 Ludwig "pre-Bohnam"
with extra stuff
FAA Ident KITH
Gender:
Posts: 1853
Quote:
the other day, i was very dissapointed to find that the most indispensable module for fightsim has gone SHAREWARE
I like to call it greedware. FSUIPC is greedware also. There is a user interface called FSconnect that is a .dll like FSUICP
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) ,2.70 gigahertz AMD Phenom II X6 1045T(6-core), two HD (1TB and 500GB), 8gb RAM, ATI Radeon HD 5570,
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 10:21am
Paz
Offline
Colonel
USA
Gender:
Posts: 1922
You would think that one of these guys who are a whiz at file manipulation would be able to take the FS2002 freeware version of active camera and make it work in 2004, doesn't seem like it would be that hard, but I am no expert on files or programming either.
&&Still no linked images allowed around here Paz! Naughty...&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 2:36pm
randombeaner
Offline
Colonel
MMM...Beans... MMM...Doughnuts
...MMM Hilary Duff.
Sothern California, USA
Gender:
Posts: 406
Im not quite shure what it is but Im a beaner and I hate paying for programs that you have to dload. I hate paying things it runs through the family!!!!
Yay lets go on strike!!!
I'll get the picket sticks
What do we want.... Frewreware for FS9...... when do we want it.... In around 6-8 weeks or when It is avalible ....bills are jerks ......vote for Bustamante ....No blood for oil ....Lower the gas prices .....I have GAS What do we want.... Frewreware for FS9...... when do we want it.... In around 6-8 weeks or when It is avalible ....bills are jerks ......vote for Bustamante ....No blood for oil ....Lower the gas prices .....I have GAS
What do we want.... Frewreware for FS9...... when do we want it.... In around 6-8 weeks or when It is avalible ....bills are jerks ......vote for Bustamante ....No blood for oil ....Lower the gas prices .....I have GAS
Im just joking so don't kill me... pleese
Believe half of what you see, 1/4 of what you hear, and nothing that I say&&&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 3:07pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Guys whilst I don't necessarily like payware I have to make a few points;
1) you don't know how the personal circumstances of the author of a piece of software may have changed, e.g. if you'd been made redundant you'd be desperate to make money out of any of your creations.
2) how many of you have taken the time to thank a freeware designer for their work? I mean how many of you emailed Pete to thank him for the years that FSUIPC has been free?
3) any suggestions of illegal activities will be dealt with swiftly here! That means the person(s) involved will be banned from this site. Cracking/copying software is illegal. You might just as well announce you get everything from Kazaa!
We have a strict policy on this issue.
Ozzy
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 7:02pm
MattNW
Offline
Colonel
Indiana
Gender:
Posts: 1762
I had Active Camera for FS2002. What I got was corrupted graphics when outside the airplane, frequent crashes of FS2002 and half the supposed views didn't work. I wouldn't mind paying for a good program that does what Active Camera claims to do but unless the payware version is a vastly different program I wouldn't pay 10 cents for it. I've always used and probably will continue to use the standard "Slew" commands. If you turn the cockpit and guages off it doesn't do a bad job, just no views of the airplane.
In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 7:28pm
Paz
Offline
Colonel
USA
Gender:
Posts: 1922
Quote:
I had Active Camera for FS2002. What I got was corrupted graphics when outside the airplane, frequent crashes of FS2002 and half the supposed views didn't work.
Dude, I still use active camera in FS2002 and I've never had any of those problems.
&&Still no linked images allowed around here Paz! Naughty...&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Aug 24
th
, 2003 at 11:42pm
Moach
Offline
Colonel
Jet-Powered PropellerHead
São Paulo, Brazil
Gender:
Posts: 991
Quote:
2) how many of you have taken the time to thank a freeware designer for their work?
i remember that the first thing i did when i first found active camera pro was sending the guy an e-mail thanking him for a wonderfull invention and for the fact that it was freeware
(this IS true)
i don't think it ever got to him...
i am not inciting piracy, i'm protesting against things that BECOME payware!
(another true story, i stopped playing The Sims because my favourite Sims website went members only)
Come, one and all aboard! - The Russian Roullete in the sky!
One in each Six of my personalities knows not at all how to fly!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Aug 25
th
, 2003 at 12:19am
robbo1
Offline
Colonel
im not valued anymore...
im gold
Gender:
Posts: 202
This is almost the same argument that I participated in quite a while ago about Dwight Booth's decision to remove his freeware aircraft from circulation. To create a freeware aircraft is great. To create a payware product is fine. But to release something as free...realise that you have cornered the market on your product...and remove it from circulation...thats wrong. Once a product is free it should remain free. Now...if this new camera program has improvements over the older one...then there could be a point made saying that it is an improved version warranting payment.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Aug 26
th
, 2003 at 7:05pm
Moach
Offline
Colonel
Jet-Powered PropellerHead
São Paulo, Brazil
Gender:
Posts: 991
i don't think there's much of a difference from the old one, except that it works on fs2004
i could be wrong....
Come, one and all aboard! - The Russian Roullete in the sky!
One in each Six of my personalities knows not at all how to fly!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Aug 27
th
, 2003 at 3:39pm
Scottler
Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA
Gender:
Posts: 5989
While I agree that it's not a great move strategically for the author to suddenly start charging, I'll also agree with Ozzy and say that they've got the right, as the software developers, to do anything they wish. It's THEIR company, and they can suddenly require you to be French to download it, if they so choose.
As for this:
Quote:
, if not just download the demo, copy the code and edit it!
Not smart, guys.
Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&
www.google.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Aug 27
th
, 2003 at 10:11pm
Ronnie
Offline
Colonel
December 17, 1903. The
reason for FS.
Texas, USA
Gender:
Posts: 620
I am in no position to have to pay for a module--even FSUIPC which I DESPERATELY need right now, much less Active Camera, which I realy enjoyed in FS2002. I'm only 13 and have an income limited to the mowing of lawns, and between paying for a third of my flying lessons and other miscellaneous things, I simply can't do it. I don't think it is fair to alot of younger simmers like myself to charge for FS products, however, they hold the copyright, so I guess it is their perrogative to charge for it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Oct 11
th
, 2003 at 9:23pm
chomp_rock
Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.
Gender:
Posts: 2718
Shareware/ payware SUCKS! Rabble! WHY PAY FOR AN ADDON FOR A GAME YOU ALREADY PAYED FOR!?!
AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Oct 12
th
, 2003 at 12:27am
Daz
Offline
Colonel
in the morning im making
WAFFLES!
Leeds, UK
Gender:
Posts: 1171
whilst i agree on the whole freeware becoming payware another expample being arrestor cables you have got to realise that the rewards from creating such complicated programs with hundreds of downloads are not enough as it is to stay freeware and in comes an investment oppurtunity....put yourself in the authors position and think about what you would do- id earn money from it.
i agree to the fact that if a product is to be made payware they should enhance it and add more features to make it stand out from the freeware version
AMD athlon XP2800+ @2.34ghz&&Epox 8RDA3G 400 fsb, 8x AGP&&1024MB DDR400 PC3200&&XFX 256MB FX5950 Ultra (oc 525/1.04)&&40 gig maxtor 7200rpm&&80 gig seagate baracuda 7200rpm&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware ««
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.