Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Interesting Flight Review... (Read 3523 times)
Reply #15 - Jun 30th, 2012 at 3:30pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
Cry I was wrong...I gave it 6 month it only last 4

Grin

where are those FRAUD FLIGHT defenders now??

  It doesn't even deserve to be free Its still too expensive to waste 1.4 GB of people's  time waiting for download for such of  MEDIOCRE game as the review said which is very true

and the worse part was what they did as a desperate claiming that "they were going to make Alaska then then New York" that definitively was the worse ,that was the lowest part of this flight adventure a lie to call attention

.well done M$ ,if you continue like this you will end up very soon like Pan am /General Motors or Enron   Smiley
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Jul 1st, 2012 at 4:18pm

Strategic Retreat   Offline
Colonel
Wish people were less
idiotic as an average

Posts: 603
*****
 
It is indeed strange.

And I'm telling this while we're losing 4:0 against Spain in the European Soccer Championship, so I DO KNOW about failure.

The question is: exactly to WHOM was directed that half a$$ed attempt called Flight.

If you compare it to... say... not FSX... not FS9... or even FS2K...

If you compare it to FS98, the only thing that has more is graphics. But FS98 at least could boast a whole PLANET of admittedly badly rendered scenery, that WAS THERE ANYWAY if you wanted to simul-fly on that spot.

It's a sort of: "how FS would have been if it was like Train Simulator, only done WORSE, because differently than Train Simuilator, that remains a SIMULATOR, Flight simulates NOTHING and it's proud of it".

It is a fascinating subject to ponder upon, if quite the pissing-off one. Where the HELL is Flight better than ANY of the last three editions of FS to have deserved publishing rights? It just SUCKS even compared to even FS2000 and is only SLIGHTLY better (and exclusively graphics-wise) than the the oldest releases (from FS98 to before). WITH WHAT KIND OF JUDGMENT was it thought out. With what kind of misplaced bravery was it published?

Was I right in thinking that them at M$ desperately wanted and still desire to ape Apple? Was I right to insinuate they wished and still long to accustom their customers to become Apple-customers-like? Was I right in feeling deeply insulted in being considered a brainless visually impaired idiot who buy a thing only for what it looks, and far away at that?

Is that why Win8 looks like a tablet version of Windows even on traditional PC? Because is catering to the same censurable phantom target?

...

Them at M$ REALLY need a overhaul of their managerial persons. A COMPLETE one. And an urgent reset, reboot and reorganization of priorities. Else they better begin compiling the paperwork for bankruptcy here and now. It'll only spare them time down the line.
 

There is no such a thing as overkill. Only unworthy targets.
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Jul 1st, 2012 at 7:08pm

ViperPilot   Offline
Colonel
KLMO Denver, CO USA

Gender: male
Posts: 211
*****
 
The release of Flight created a schism in the Flight Simulation community that will probably never heal itself.
 

[...
"I created the Little Black Book to keep myself from getting killed..."
-- Captain Elrey Borge Jeppesen

P4 3.0 SINGLE CORE, 2GB Corsair RAM, ATI Radeon 4650 1GB, OCZ 600w PSU, Samsung 160GB HD XP SP3

Proud User of: FS8 FS9 CFS CFS2 IL2
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Jul 1st, 2012 at 7:41pm

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
*****
 
ViperPilot wrote on Jul 1st, 2012 at 7:08pm:
The release of Flight created a schism in the Flight Simulation community that will probably never heal itself.


that as the purpose of M$ Flight, to destroy and inconvenient well define auto created community from a very long time,to own it ,to manipulate it and erase what was born because of their creations (MS Flight Simulator Series) 

  they thought by making airplanes/scenery by themselves and kill control & transform  the old Flight Simulation Community into Flight Community they would make the deal of the decade 

they are good in brain washing ,some has been banned from this forum ,others has very strong arguments among each others and at the end This part of the forum became inactive ,and yes I agree with you I don't see the same enthusiasm used to be for FSX/FS9 since fraudflight came out.




    
   
 

...

Venezuela
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Jul 1st, 2012 at 8:15pm

Strategic Retreat   Offline
Colonel
Wish people were less
idiotic as an average

Posts: 603
*****
 
alrot wrote on Jul 1st, 2012 at 7:41pm:
...they are good in brain washing...


Forgive me in THE REAL WORLD, brain washing is like hypnotism. We're not talking about mad scientists with a bad hair day that put a hairdresser helmet on your head and then they will make you do what they want with only a switch being pressed on the nearby bench.

The same way hypnotism is impossible to happen to you without your cooperation, REAL WORLD brain washing CANNOT happen to someone unless the subject is broken first... or a complete dimwit to begin with.

This fact suggests that those who allowed M$ to brainwash them were either broken or dimwitted (or both), and if so, I staunchly believe THIS community CAN make due without them and actually WILL BE STRONGER because of their absence.

Going off half cocked sure to conquer your enemy and finishing with making said enemy stronger instead by weeding the unfits is the mark of a strategist whose ability in being a failure is too big for him to be human. He or she must perhaps be something even more underdeveloped (brain wise) than a banana. Tongue
 

There is no such a thing as overkill. Only unworthy targets.
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Jul 1st, 2012 at 10:11pm

Rocket_Bird   Offline
Colonel
Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 1214
*****
 
Strategic Retreat wrote on Jul 1st, 2012 at 4:18pm:
If you compare it to FS98, the only thing that has more is graphics. But FS98 at least could boast a whole PLANET of admittedly badly rendered scenery, that WAS THERE ANYWAY if you wanted to simul-fly on that spot.



Forget FS98.  Even FS 5.0, or FS 4 for that matter, has more content, sim, and game than Flight and those sims fit into little floppy disks if anyone remembers them  Wink
 

Cheers,
RB

...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print