Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
MS Flight
› Interesting Flight Review...
(Moderators: beaky, ozzy72, Fly2e, Bob70, JBaymore, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
Interesting Flight Review... (Read 3523 times)
Reply #15 -
Jun 30
th
, 2012 at 3:30pm
alrot
Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..
Posts: 10231
I was wrong...I gave it 6 month it only last 4
where are those
FRAUD
FLIGHT defenders now??
It doesn't even deserve to be free Its still too expensive to waste 1.4 GB of people's time waiting for download for such of MEDIOCRE game as the review said which is very true
and the worse part was what they did as a desperate claiming that "
they were going to make Alaska then then New York
" that definitively was the worse ,that was the lowest part of this flight adventure a lie to call attention
.well done M$ ,if you continue like this you will end up very soon like Pan am /General Motors or Enron
Venezuela
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 4:18pm
Strategic Retreat
Offline
Colonel
Wish people were less
idiotic as an average
Posts: 603
It is indeed strange.
And I'm telling this while we're losing 4:0 against Spain in the European Soccer Championship, so I DO KNOW about failure.
The question is: exactly to WHOM was directed that half a$$ed attempt called Flight.
If you compare it to... say... not FSX... not FS9... or even FS2K...
If you compare it to
FS98
, the only thing that has more is graphics. But FS98 at least could boast a whole PLANET of admittedly badly rendered scenery, that WAS THERE ANYWAY if you wanted to simul-fly on
that
spot.
It's a sort of: "
how FS would have been if it was like Train Simulator, only done WORSE, because differently than Train Simuilator, that remains a SIMULATOR, Flight
simulates
NOTHING and it's proud of it
".
It is a fascinating subject to ponder upon, if quite the pissing-off one. Where the HELL is Flight better than ANY of the last
three
editions of FS to have deserved publishing rights? It just SUCKS even compared to even FS2000 and is only SLIGHTLY better (
and exclusively graphics-wise
) than the the oldest releases (
from FS98 to before
). WITH WHAT KIND OF JUDGMENT was it thought out. With what kind of misplaced bravery was it published?
Was I right in thinking that them at M$ desperately wanted and still desire to ape Apple? Was I right to insinuate they wished and still long to accustom their customers to become Apple-customers-like? Was I right in feeling deeply insulted in being considered a brainless visually impaired idiot who buy a thing only for what it looks, and far away at that?
Is that why Win8 looks like a tablet version of Windows even on traditional PC? Because is catering to the same censurable phantom target?
...
Them at M$ REALLY need a overhaul of their managerial persons. A COMPLETE one. And an urgent reset, reboot and reorganization of priorities. Else they better begin compiling the paperwork for bankruptcy here and now. It'll only spare them time down the line.
There is no such a thing as overkill. Only unworthy targets.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 7:08pm
ViperPilot
Offline
Colonel
KLMO Denver, CO USA
Gender:
Posts: 211
The release of
Flight
created a schism in the Flight Simulation community that will probably never heal itself.
[
"I created the Little Black Book to keep myself from getting killed..."
-- Captain Elrey Borge Jeppesen
P4 3.0 SINGLE CORE, 2GB Corsair RAM, ATI Radeon 4650 1GB, OCZ 600w PSU, Samsung 160GB HD XP SP3
Proud User of: FS8 FS9 CFS CFS2 IL2
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 7:41pm
alrot
Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..
Posts: 10231
ViperPilot wrote
on Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 7:08pm:
The release of
Flight
created a schism in the Flight Simulation community that will probably never heal itself.
that as the purpose of M$ Flight, to destroy and
inconvenient
well define auto created community from a very long time,to own it ,to manipulate it and erase what was born because of their creations (MS Flight Simulator Series)
they thought by making airplanes/scenery by themselves and kill control & transform the old Flight Simulation Community into
Flight Community
they would make the deal of the decade
they are good in brain washing ,some has been banned from this forum ,others has very strong arguments among each others and at the end This part of the forum became inactive ,and yes I agree with you I don't see the same enthusiasm used to be for FSX/FS9 since fraudflight came out.
Venezuela
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 8:15pm
Strategic Retreat
Offline
Colonel
Wish people were less
idiotic as an average
Posts: 603
alrot wrote
on Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 7:41pm:
...they are good in brain washing...
Forgive me in THE REAL WORLD, brain washing is like hypnotism. We're not talking about mad scientists with a bad hair day that put a hairdresser helmet on your head and then they will make you do what they want with only a switch being pressed on the nearby bench.
The same way hypnotism is impossible to happen to you without your cooperation, REAL WORLD brain washing CANNOT happen to someone unless the subject is broken first... or a complete dimwit to begin with.
This
fact
suggests that those who allowed M$ to brainwash them were either broken or dimwitted (
or both
), and if so, I staunchly believe THIS community CAN make due without them and actually WILL BE STRONGER because of their absence.
Going off half cocked sure to conquer your enemy and finishing with making said enemy stronger instead by weeding the unfits is the mark of a strategist whose ability in being a failure is too big for him to be human. He or she must perhaps be something even more underdeveloped (
brain wise
) than a banana.
There is no such a thing as overkill. Only unworthy targets.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 10:11pm
Rocket_Bird
Offline
Colonel
Canada
Gender:
Posts: 1214
Strategic Retreat wrote
on Jul 1
st
, 2012 at 4:18pm:
If you compare it to
FS98
, the only thing that has more is graphics. But FS98 at least could boast a whole PLANET of admittedly badly rendered scenery, that WAS THERE ANYWAY if you wanted to simul-fly on
that
spot.
Forget FS98. Even FS 5.0, or FS 4 for that matter, has more content, sim, and game than Flight and those sims fit into little floppy disks if anyone remembers them
Cheers,
RB
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight ««
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.