Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
MS Flight
› Is Flight a Simulator?
(Moderators: beaky, ozzy72, Fly2e, Bob70, JBaymore, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Poll
Question:
Is Flight a Simulator?
*** This poll has now closed ***
Yes
9 (23.1%)
No
15 (38.5%)
Sort of
10 (25.6%)
Not sure
5 (12.8%)
Total votes: 39
« Created by:
andy190
on: Apr 20
th
, 2012 at 5:31pm »
Pages:
1
2
3
Is Flight a Simulator? (Read 8631 times)
Reply #15 -
Apr 21
st
, 2012 at 5:47pm
andy190
Offline
Colonel
This is the voice of the
Mysterons...
Havelock North, NZ
Gender:
Posts: 1368
Quote:
I hope Andy didn't get mad at some of us.
No I'm not mad at you lot.
It's interesting to see peoples differing opinions on what a simulator is.
Intel Core i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Apr 21
st
, 2012 at 6:27pm
Steve M
Offline
Colonel
Cambridge On.
Gender:
Posts: 4097
andy190 wrote
on Apr 21
st
, 2012 at 5:47pm:
Quote:
I hope Andy didn't get mad at some of us.
No I'm not mad at you lot.
It's interesting to see peoples differing opinions on what a simulator is.
Thanks Andy.
Flying with twins is a lot of fun..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Apr 21
st
, 2012 at 6:46pm
alrot
Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..
Posts: 10231
andy190 wrote
on Apr 21
st
, 2012 at 5:47pm:
Quote:
I hope Andy didn't get mad at some of us.
No I'm not mad at you lot.
It's interesting to see peoples differing opinions on what a simulator is.
S I M U L A T O R
that Simulates
But the word does not measure how accurate must be to qualify
this game Simulates a space invasion
http://digitalinsane.com/games/space-invaders/
Now there's been a confusion about a game simulation here ,ALL GAMES ARE SIMULATION ..
I think the word should be Is Microsoft Flight Simulator game Its a training Software? Cat it be use as to train Students?
Or How accurate does Flight Simulator Series is comparising to
Flight Training Simulators
?
Venezuela
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 8:21am
jetprop
Offline
Colonel
A freeware addict!
a chair infront of a monitor.
Posts: 1523
Alrot:
I agree.
A better question would be:
Is flight as close to training simulators as FSX etc?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 9:18am
Flight Ace
Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Virginia
Gender:
Posts: 205
jetprop wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 8:21am:
Alrot:
I agree.
A better question would be:
Is flight as close to training simulators as FSX etc?
These are the requirements for a Flight Simulator to be qualified to train flight crews. Microsoft Flight and Flight Simulator X do not meet these qualifications.
According to 14 CFR 61.1 (5) [Title 14 Aeronautics and Space; Chapter I Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation; Subchapter D Airmen; Part 61 Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors; Subpart A General; Special Federal Aviation Regulations], Flight Simulator means “a device that --
(i) Is a full-size aircraft cockpit replica of a specific type of aircraft, or make, model, and series of aircraft;
(ii) Includes the hardware and software necessary to represent the aircraft in ground operations and flight operations;
(iii) Uses a force cueing system that provides cues at least equivalent to those cues provided by a 3 degree freedom of motion system;
(iv) Uses a visual system that provides at least a 45 degree horizontal field of view and a 30 degree vertical field of view simultaneously for each pilot; and
(v) Has been evaluated, qualified, and approved by the Administrator
However, with the aid of a computer, throttle, joy stick, and pedals, both simulate flight. Microsoft developed FSX as a Flight Simulator and MF as a game. Both have the purpose of enjoying the fun, freedom, and adventure of flight. Neither are close to meeting the above qualifications for flight crew training.
1. Chaser MK-1 Full Tower ATX Computer Case
2. Core i7 3770K 1155 Processor OC to 4.7 GHz
3. ASUS Maximus V Gene Motherboard
4. EVGA GTX580 1536MB Video Card
5. 16 GB C8 G.SKILL Low Profile RAM
6. Noctua NH-D14 CPU Cooler
7. 240 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD
8. 120 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD
9. 1 TB Backup Drive
10. Samsung TOC 26 inch Monitor
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 12:21pm
jetprop
Offline
Colonel
A freeware addict!
a chair infront of a monitor.
Posts: 1523
Flight Ace wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 9:18am:
jetprop wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 8:21am:
Alrot:
I agree.
A better question would be:
Is flight as close to training simulators as FSX etc?
These are the requirements for a Flight Simulator to be qualified to train flight crews. Microsoft Flight and Flight Simulator X do not meet these qualifications.
According to 14 CFR 61.1 (5) [Title 14 Aeronautics and Space; Chapter I Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation; Subchapter D Airmen; Part 61 Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors; Subpart A General; Special Federal Aviation Regulations], Flight Simulator means “a device that --
(i) Is a full-size aircraft cockpit replica of a specific type of aircraft, or make, model, and series of aircraft;
(ii) Includes the hardware and software necessary to represent the aircraft in ground operations and flight operations;
(iii) Uses a force cueing system that provides cues at least equivalent to those cues provided by a 3 degree freedom of motion system;
(iv) Uses a visual system that provides at least a 45 degree horizontal field of view and a 30 degree vertical field of view simultaneously for each pilot; and
(v) Has been evaluated, qualified, and approved by the Administrator
However, with the aid of a computer, throttle, joy stick, and pedals, both simulate flight. Microsoft developed FSX as a Flight Simulator and MF as a game. Both have the purpose of enjoying the fun, freedom, and adventure of flight. Neither are close to meeting the above qualifications for flight crew training.
I mean:
FSX is more realistic than flight and has the abiility for ATC.
Motion simulation is also possible as has been done before.(I am pretty sure)
Full replicas would ALSO possible,the coding is there...
Both have the ability for a 45 degree horizontal field of view and a 30 degree vertical field of view.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 1:07pm
alrot
Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..
Posts: 10231
jetprop wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 12:21pm:
FSX is more realistic than flight
really?
/FS2000 /FS2002 /fs9 Its wayyyyyyyy more realistic than Flight
even Flightgear its better than flight
Venezuela
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 3:00pm
BlackAce
Offline
Colonel
If it's not Boeing, I'm
not going.
KBOI; Boise, Idaho
Gender:
Posts: 1203
I thinks it's a game for people who just want to fly, and not use systems
Lenovo Y570: Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor( 2.2GHz 1333MHz 6MB) Nvidia 555M graphics, 8GB Memory/RAM 1TB of space
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 3:49pm
Flight Ace
Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Virginia
Gender:
Posts: 205
jetprop wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 12:21pm:
Flight Ace wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 9:18am:
jetprop wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 8:21am:
Alrot:
I agree.
A better question would be:
Is flight as close to training simulators as FSX etc?
These are the requirements for a Flight Simulator to be qualified to train flight crews. Microsoft Flight and Flight Simulator X do not meet these qualifications.
According to 14 CFR 61.1 (5) [Title 14 Aeronautics and Space; Chapter I Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation; Subchapter D Airmen; Part 61 Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors; Subpart A General; Special Federal Aviation Regulations], Flight Simulator means “a device that --
(i) Is a full-size aircraft cockpit replica of a specific type of aircraft, or make, model, and series of aircraft;
(ii) Includes the hardware and software necessary to represent the aircraft in ground operations and flight operations;
(iii) Uses a force cueing system that provides cues at least equivalent to those cues provided by a 3 degree freedom of motion system;
(iv) Uses a visual system that provides at least a 45 degree horizontal field of view and a 30 degree vertical field of view simultaneously for each pilot; and
(v) Has been evaluated, qualified, and approved by the Administrator
However, with the aid of a computer, throttle, joy stick, and pedals, both simulate flight. Microsoft developed FSX as a Flight Simulator and MF as a game. Both have the purpose of enjoying the fun, freedom, and adventure of flight. Neither are close to meeting the above qualifications for flight crew training.
I mean:
FSX is more realistic than flight and has the abiility for ATC.
Motion simulation is also possible as has been done before.(I am pretty sure)
Full replicas would ALSO possible,the coding is there...
Both have the ability for a 45 degree horizontal field of view and a 30 degree vertical field of view.
Yes, in my opinion, FSX is years ahead of MF for being a realistic Flight Simulator.
Years ago I took off VFR from a field in Germany flying to Hamburg. Just before arriving, the ceiling dropped down below 1000 feet. I called Hamburg ATC and was set up for a Ground Control Approach (GCA). I was instructed to immediately climb to 2000 feet then radar directed around the area for a final approach. I was turned over to a GCA operator who then talked me down for landing. I broke out of the clouds at about 300 feet lined up with the runway. I was flying an Army Beaver with 5 passengers. This is only one of many weather related experiences I have encountered during both VFR and IFR flights before retiring as a Master Army Aviator.
The point is, I cannot replicate the above or other past weather related experiences with MF. In contrast, FSX allows me to set up similer flight situations using ATC, ILS, and GPS, and given a choice of location, aircraft, and weather conditions.
Both FM and FSX simulate flight and can be called flight simulators based on the pure dictionary definition. Neither, in my opinion, will ever meet the requirements for flight crew training I presented in my previous post. However, of the two, FSX would have the best chance of achieving it.
1. Chaser MK-1 Full Tower ATX Computer Case
2. Core i7 3770K 1155 Processor OC to 4.7 GHz
3. ASUS Maximus V Gene Motherboard
4. EVGA GTX580 1536MB Video Card
5. 16 GB C8 G.SKILL Low Profile RAM
6. Noctua NH-D14 CPU Cooler
7. 240 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD
8. 120 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD
9. 1 TB Backup Drive
10. Samsung TOC 26 inch Monitor
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 6:21pm
BrandonF
Offline
Colonel
The Future of Flight
Location: Earth...Duh!!!!
Gender:
Posts: 2296
alrot wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 1:07pm:
jetprop wrote
on Apr 22
nd
, 2012 at 12:21pm:
FSX is more realistic than flight
really?
/FS2000 /FS2002 /fs9 Its wayyyyyyyy more realistic than Flight
even Flightgear its better than flight
FS2000 simulates all the functionality of the Flight planes, realistic physics, as well as visuals such as reflections, high poly models, water reflections, 3D fog, and all kinds of real time shadowing? Wow, I did not know that! I'll have to go start up FS2000...
</sarcasm>
I know Flight is no FSX replacement, but really?!!
Another thing to make me think: Why did I even come back here?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 6:35pm
andy190
Offline
Colonel
This is the voice of the
Mysterons...
Havelock North, NZ
Gender:
Posts: 1368
Quote:
Another thing to make me think: Why did I even come back here?
Brandon, I made this thread so that people could stop arguing about Flight & so people who left because of the arguments could come back.
Intel Core i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 8:12pm
Steve M
Offline
Colonel
Cambridge On.
Gender:
Posts: 4097
andy190 wrote
on Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 6:35pm:
Quote:
Another thing to make me think: Why did I even come back here?
Brandon, I made this thread so that people could stop arguing about Flight & so people who left because of the arguments could come back.
Actually, a lot of these comments were not about Flight specifically, and it has been a nice clean discussion about simulators for the most part. Maybe not totally on topic, but if you ask which one is a simulator, another may ask what is a simulator? I have enjoyed reading most of the comments on this thread.
I believe the fans of Flight, FSX, and FS9 could sit at a round table and banter until the cows come home, same as religion and politics, I think. But.. no one should go away mad. Hundreds of people can express their opinions, but hundreds of people can never make a single unified decision.
Flying with twins is a lot of fun..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 9:13pm
Flying Trucker
Offline
Colonel
An Old Retired Rocking
Chair Flying Geezer
Gender:
Posts: 11425
Well said/typed Steve...
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Apr 25
th
, 2012 at 3:45am
Matjaz
Offline
2nd Lieutenant
I Love Simviation.
Krsko, Slovenia
Gender:
Posts: 1
Steve M wrote
on Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 8:12pm:
andy190 wrote
on Apr 23
rd
, 2012 at 6:35pm:
Quote:
Another thing to make me think: Why did I even come back here?
Brandon, I made this thread so that people could stop arguing about Flight & so people who left because of the arguments could come back.
Actually, a lot of these comments were not about Flight specifically, and it has been a nice clean discussion about simulators for the most part. Maybe not totally on topic, but if you ask which one is a simulator, another may ask what is a simulator? I have enjoyed reading most of the comments on this thread.
I believe the fans of Flight, FSX, and FS9 could sit at a round table and banter until the cows come home, same as religion and politics, I think. But.. no one should go away mad. Hundreds of people can express their opinions, but hundreds of people can never make a single unified decision.
+1
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Apr 25
th
, 2012 at 7:45pm
Flying Trucker
Offline
Colonel
An Old Retired Rocking
Chair Flying Geezer
Gender:
Posts: 11425
Goodly evening all...
AND
The plot thickens...
-Microsoft Flight Simulator X...Delux Edition
AND
-Microsoft Flight Simulator X...Acceleration
Expansion Pack
Bottom of each of the above boxes:
Port Side
-Below content rated by ESRB
-it says:
-
GAME Experience May Change During Online Play
Starboard Side
-it says:
-Microsoft game studios
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight ««
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.