Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
MS Flight
› Should this Board be Moved?
(Moderators: beaky, ozzy72, Fly2e, Bob70, JBaymore, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
Should this Board be Moved? (Read 6556 times)
Reply #60 -
Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 7:14pm
Steve M
Offline
Colonel
Cambridge On.
Gender:
Posts: 4097
I don't care anymore where the 'Flight' board is located. I've been reading speculation and opinions for well over a year and even offered up a few of my thoughts now and then. Microsoft wants your money, so the chance of seeing another open source type of simulator from MS in the future, is dead and buried. So if you like Flight, then happy trails to you. If you don't like it, you know the path to take.
Flying with twins is a lot of fun..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #61 -
Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 7:42pm
JoBee
Offline
Colonel
Better to give than receive.
Posts: 582
Wing Nut wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 5:27pm:
No, actually, it's not.
If this is directed to me, sorry I don't understand what your referring to. What's not?
Wing Nut wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 5:27pm:
There are plenty of instances where a plane can be ported from FS9 to FSX with minimal effort. The CFS2 planes could even be ported into FS9.
I never said they could not, done a few myself.
Wing Nut wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 5:27pm:
Backwards compatibility will never be perfect, but it is an excellent tool. I'm sure right now there's someone, somewhere trying to figure out how to convert a .mdl to a .model.
I don't want backwards compatibility if it requires staying with the same old CPU clogging code that cannot take advantage of all the GPU advances that have happened in the last couple of years.
And yes there is a locked thread at Avsim in which members are cracking Flight and extracting models. That isn't the hard part, getting modified models back in will be the challenge. But that isn't "backwards compatibility", technically it's theft and will remain so until Microsoft releases an SDK, which I think they will at some point.
Camel_Moe wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 6:31pm:
...you could buy any MSFS title, run it, and never buy a thing for it again. You had a larger stable of planes, with a variety to choose from, a whole world, and assorted features like AI, right out of the box.
Granted, I don't deny that.
Camel_Moe wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 6:31pm:
Now you have to buy the whole program bit by bit, for a total that could reach into the hundreds of dollars or more, just to get a comparable content when compared to what was standard in a MSFS title.
"Comparable content" is where you lose me. I think to get Flight quality visuals in FSX most people spend hundreds of dollars on Ultimate Terrain, GEX, FEX, REX, Active Sky, addon airports, you can go to Orbx alone and spend close to a grand.
I know that Flight doesn't meet all those addons in terms of quality .....yet. But it might in the future.
Wow, has this wandered off-topic.
cheers,
Joe
Don't argue with idiots, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #62 -
Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 9:32pm
Camel_Moe
Offline
Colonel
Manufacturer of high quality
spam since 2002
Gender:
Posts: 251
Ahhh, ok, I see where I lost you. I'm refering to quantity, not quality.
"Comparable content" in the extreme sense would be a quantity of scenery, aircraft, features, etc, equal to what MSFS has out of the box.
However, say for me, I need at minimum, the whole US. Going by the current prices and areas available, a pretty safe guess for me to do that would be at least $100, probably more, and not including new aircraft.
Ok, so I plunk down, say, $130 for the entire US, and some planes. I've allready more than doubled what I had to spend JUST to do what I do with MSFS in the US, still minus frills like AI. Never mind the rest of the world for this example. Just pretend all I needed was the US, and I was willing to pay that much to use it in Flight.
So now the question is, for a "Flight 2", do I have to start over and plunk that money down to get the same stuff again?
Alternately, is there a "Flight 2" where I can still use my previous "flight 1" DLC, but I now have very little reason to invest because I have all I want, and thus MS makes significantly less from me?
Last possible scenario, is "Flight 1" all there ever is untill it becomes obsolete, and that's the end of the Flight series? Fini. No more.
That's where we were going with it.
As for the OT.....My bad, I think I derailed us on page 2, talking about Wiki....
Online Interactions Not Rated by the ESRB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #63 -
Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 10:04pm
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
JoBee wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 7:42pm:
[quote author=0807111A020D630 link=1331408790/54#54 date=1331587679]I think to get Flight quality visuals in FSX most people spend hundreds of dollars on Ultimate Terrain, GEX, FEX, REX, Active Sky, addon airports, you can go to Orbx alone and spend close to a grand.
You forgot SEX! Sound Environment Extreme...
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #64 -
Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 11:40pm
JBaymore
Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!
Gender:
Posts: 10261
Aren't you glad you asked the question, Pete?
best,
.............john
Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M, Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #65 -
Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 11:28am
Camel_Moe
Offline
Colonel
Manufacturer of high quality
spam since 2002
Gender:
Posts: 251
JBaymore wrote
on Mar 12
th
, 2012 at 11:40pm:
Aren't you glad you asked the question, Pete?
best,
.............john
What was the question again?
Seriously, this is almost the only thread going in a bit over two days, the other being a small thread for joystick help.
What it really comes down to, is that it's Pete's site, he can put Flight under the "Wierd things that give me headaches" section if he wants. He was thoughtfull enough to ask for member opinions instead of just up and moving it.
Frankly, I doubt that any move, or not moving of the board, will effect Flight itself in any real tangible fashion. We'll all just continue on with it just the same, OT silliness and all, regardless of where it ends up. If Flight is going to die, board location isn't going to speed that up, or stop it.
Online Interactions Not Rated by the ESRB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #66 -
Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 12:20pm
pete
Offline
Admin
'That would be a network
issue'
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 8500
You're right moe ... it wouldn't make any difference ...
I usually arrange boards in terms of relevance to this site and popularity ....
So .... I can see the 'Flight' board being moved down to the bottom of this section once the novelty has worn off .... & then let's see where it goes in terms of what people are saying about it ...
Think Global. It's the world we live in.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #67 -
Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 1:05pm
alrot
Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..
Posts: 10231
pete wrote
on Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 12:20pm:
So .... I can see the 'Flight' board being moved down to the bottom of this section once the novelty has worn off .....
you wont have to wait too long anyways..
6 month max.......
Alex
«
Last Edit: Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 6:53pm by alrot
»
Venezuela
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #68 -
Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 3:00pm
jetprop
Offline
Colonel
A freeware addict!
a chair infront of a monitor.
Posts: 1523
OK,people.
Those who say that you need to spend loads on FSX to make it as good as flight are wrong.
I use a pc of roughly 300/400 euro,FSX for 20 euro and the rest is all freeware,and look at my shots!
I run it at 12-20 FPS with most setting near/at the top wich is all I need.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #69 -
Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 6:11pm
Camel_Moe
Offline
Colonel
Manufacturer of high quality
spam since 2002
Gender:
Posts: 251
jetprop wrote
on Mar 13
th
, 2012 at 3:00pm:
OK,people.
Those who say that you need to spend loads on FSX to make it as good as flight are wrong.
I use a pc of roughly 300/400 euro,FSX for 20 euro and the rest is all freeware,and look at my shots!
I run it at 12-20 FPS with most setting near/at the top wich is all I need.
Heck, since 1982 I could count all the payware I bought on one hand, up untill last month that is. Now all my saved "just in case there is an FS11" hardware money is being thrown at payware like ORBX and REX, Corenado, Just Flight, etc. That's more about a recent desire to support 3rd party than it is about needing the stuff to get what I want out of FSX.
I just finnaly decided that now that it looks like FSX is going to be the last of it's kind from MS, I might as well "supercharge" it with the funds, and give the payware people some support in the process.
Freeware has done it for me just fine for years, and if I thought there was a next MSFS in the pipe, I probably wouldn't be buying all that payware now either.
Online Interactions Not Rated by the ESRB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #70 -
Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 1:19pm
Flight Ace
Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Virginia
Gender:
Posts: 205
Pete,
Great choice and your justification for it is sound.
I just picked up on an article in the Wall Street Journal and thought it should be posted as a separate subject, however I am posting it here since the discussion reference this article was discussed here.
Here is the Headline in the Marketplace Section of the Wall Street Journal I received this morning.
"End of Era for Britannica"
Here are a couple of quotes from the article.
"But the company has a long way to go before it can touch the online presence of Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia supported by the nonprofit Wikipedia Foundation. Wikipedia appears as the No 1 result on Google for 56% of searches, according to a 2012 study by Intelligent Positioning Ltd , a U.K. based agency that helps business increase their online traffic."
Mr. Cauz, President of Encyclopedia Britannica, said, and again I quote.
"The company has already taken other pages out of Wikipedias's book. Britannica on line allows readers to make revisions to the encyclopedia articles which are then published by editors after a review process."
My source for the above is the latest press release of the Wall Street Journal. Makes me wonder, will some Universities now black list Britannica?
1. Chaser MK-1 Full Tower ATX Computer Case
2. Core i7 3770K 1155 Processor OC to 4.7 GHz
3. ASUS Maximus V Gene Motherboard
4. EVGA GTX580 1536MB Video Card
5. 16 GB C8 G.SKILL Low Profile RAM
6. Noctua NH-D14 CPU Cooler
7. 240 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD
8. 120 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD
9. 1 TB Backup Drive
10. Samsung TOC 26 inch Monitor
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #71 -
Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 1:42pm
Camel_Moe
Offline
Colonel
Manufacturer of high quality
spam since 2002
Gender:
Posts: 251
It is my understanding that the Britannica review process will remain very much the same, so I would imagine the objections to referencing the Britannica online will be about what they are now. It's not like people will be able to make changes "wiki style", on the fly.
However, universities generally frown on using the encyclopedia has a primary reference already.
Online Interactions Not Rated by the ESRB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #72 -
Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 6:40pm
striker
Offline
Colonel
Don't read this. Read
my post.
Wilmington, NC
Posts: 110
Quote:
Heck, since 1982 I could count all the payware I bought on one hand, up untill last month that is. Now all my saved "just in case there is an FS11" hardware money is being thrown at payware like ORBX and REX, Corenado, Just Flight, etc
Hey don't support Carenado man - they are the ones being paid highly making the planes for M$ Flight and making a good killing from M$ by doing this. Also some of the other scenery guys are contracted to M$ for lots of $$$$. Not sure which ones making scenery but I know for sure Carenado is making props for MS Flight.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #73 -
Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 7:00pm
andy190
Offline
Colonel
This is the voice of the
Mysterons...
Havelock North, NZ
Gender:
Posts: 1368
striker wrote
on Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 6:40pm:
Quote:
Heck, since 1982 I could count all the payware I bought on one hand, up untill last month that is. Now all my saved "just in case there is an FS11" hardware money is being thrown at payware like ORBX and REX, Corenado, Just Flight, etc
Hey don't support Carenado man - they are the ones being paid highly making the planes for M$ Flight and making a good killing from M$ by doing this. Also some of the other scenery guys are contracted to M$ for lots of $$$$. Not sure which ones making scenery but I know for sure Carenado is making props for MS Flight.
And where did you read that Carenado are making Props for Flight?
It doesn't matter if Carenado are making Props for Flight, if we buy their FSX stuff more than their Flight stuff then they will realise what they've signed up for.
Intel Core i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #74 -
Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 8:43pm
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
striker wrote
on Mar 14
th
, 2012 at 6:40pm:
Quote:
Heck, since 1982 I could count all the payware I bought on one hand, up untill last month that is. Now all my saved "just in case there is an FS11" hardware money is being thrown at payware like ORBX and REX, Corenado, Just Flight, etc
Hey don't support Carenado man - they are the ones being paid highly making the planes for M$ Flight and making a good killing from M$ by doing this. Also some of the other scenery guys are contracted to M$ for lots of $$$$. Not sure which ones making scenery but I know for sure Carenado is making props for MS Flight.
Man, where do people get this stuff...
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
...
3
4
5
6
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight ««
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.