Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Specific Aircraft Types
› Is it still flyable?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Is it still flyable? (Read 1884 times)
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 11:11am
skoker
Offline
Colonel
Jordan never wore his
safety goggles...
1G3
Gender:
Posts: 4611
It looks like its 99% still intact minus scraping, saved the engines... is it still a good plane and would the FAA let it fly?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH_AzTvnN_Q
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 12:13pm
Dave71k
Ex Member
I don't see why not, there has been worse damage to airliners that have gone on to fly again.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 2:35pm
Mike..
Offline
Colonel
Beer is the answer, I
can't remember the question.
Fayetteville NC
Gender:
Posts: 1688
New gear, a couple of new props, and some plastic surgery to her nose and i'd imagine she'd be right as rain
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 4:05pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
You can rebuild anything. The most recent airworthy Spitfire restoration was based on an airframe that had laid under a beach for over 40 years!
In a case like this, I suspect the insurers will have the final say, particularly on older GA airframes as their value generally decreases with age.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 6:53pm
andy190
Offline
Colonel
This is the voice of the
Mysterons...
Havelock North, NZ
Gender:
Posts: 1368
Quote:
You can rebuild anything.
Your right there. The Polikarpovs that Sir Tim Wallis restored had been at the bottom of a lake since World War 2.
Intel Core i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 8:00pm
Dave71k
Ex Member
andy190 wrote
on Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 6:53pm:
Quote:
You can rebuild anything.
Your right there. The Polikarpovs that Sir Tim Wallis restored had been at the bottom of a lake since World War 2.
At what point do you go from calling it a restored aircraft to a replica because some aircraft such as those you mentioned only actually have like 5% of the original left in them and to me that doesn't make it a restoration it's a new aircraft with a old part bolted on?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 8:18pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
Quote:
andy190 wrote
on Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 6:53pm:
Quote:
You can rebuild anything.
Your right there. The Polikarpovs that Sir Tim Wallis restored had been at the bottom of a lake since World War 2.
At what point do you go from calling it a restored aircraft to a replica because some aircraft such as those you mentioned only actually have like 5% of the original left in them and to me that doesn't make it a restoration it's a new aircraft with a old part bolted on?
The FAA definition of a restoration, as long as it has the original data plate with serial number, it is an original aircraft. Often times when groups are looking to find and recover a lost aircraft, they are most worried about finding the original data plate. Every other part can be brand new, so long as it has an original factory plate.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 11:10pm
andy190
Offline
Colonel
This is the voice of the
Mysterons...
Havelock North, NZ
Gender:
Posts: 1368
Well I believe that the I-16's have more than 5% of the original plane in them. I think the fuselages are pretty much original & Sir Tim got the new parts made to the same specs as they were originally made to in the 1930’s & 40’s.
Intel Core i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450, Windows 7 Professional 64 bit, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Feb 28
th
, 2012 at 3:11am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
DaveSims wrote
on Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 8:18pm:
Quote:
andy190 wrote
on Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 6:53pm:
Quote:
You can rebuild anything.
Your right there. The Polikarpovs that Sir Tim Wallis restored had been at the bottom of a lake since World War 2.
At what point do you go from calling it a restored aircraft to a replica because some aircraft such as those you mentioned only actually have like 5% of the original left in them and to me that doesn't make it a restoration it's a new aircraft with a old part bolted on?
The FAA definition of a restoration, as long as it has the original data plate with serial number, it is an original aircraft. Often times when groups are looking to find and recover a lost aircraft, they are most worried about finding the original data plate. Every other part can be brand new, so long as it has an original factory plate.
It is the same with engines. The only true original part of an engine is the serial number plate. To that end, I have an engine installed above my fireplace......
As to the original question. If the spare parts and a proficient metal mechanic are to hand, this aircraft
could
be back in the air in a week. I saw nothing in the video that would cause me any great concern.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Feb 28
th
, 2012 at 3:35am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Not sure what all the fuss is about. We're not talking about a major restoration here. This sort of thing happens all the time. The only question is whether the insurance company or owner think it's worth repairing.
I thought the pilot did a good job. Note that he tried to line the props up during the approach to avoid damage. Unfortunately not quite successful. As usual the news reporters were trying to make a drama out of a crisis.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Feb 28
th
, 2012 at 5:37am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
andy190 wrote
on Feb 27
th
, 2012 at 6:53pm:
Quote:
You can rebuild anything.
Your right there. The Polikarpovs that Sir Tim Wallis restored had been at the bottom of a lake since World War 2.
At what point do you go from calling it a restored aircraft to a replica because some aircraft such as those you mentioned only actually have like 5% of the original left in them and to me that doesn't make it a restoration it's a new aircraft with a old part bolted on?
Worms. Can of.
Quite a bit of the restored Grumman Wildcat population (and others) spent the best part of half a century at the bottom of Lake Michigan! The Russian examples are "special" in that the preservation conditions are generally remarkable (fresh water, peat bogs, very cold). There was an intact P-39 (IIRC) brought up about 5 years or so ago that had made an emergency landing, and the pilot was still sat in the cockpit after more than 60 years, almost perfectly preserved in the water.
http://lend-lease.airforce.ru/english/articles/sheppard/p39/index.htm
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Feb 29
th
, 2012 at 7:31pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Re the 310 in the clip: It would have to be gone over pretty thoroughly, just in case (they stopped making these a while back, so it could be a pretty high-time airframe), but I see no reason why it would not be flyable with very little work. Just sparing the props and engines alone makes a world of difference.
I thought he looked a bit nervous there, feeling for the ground too much, but that was nice work, bumping the starters to make sure the props were out of harm's way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Apr 20
th
, 2012 at 3:22pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
AFAIK they managed to find some factory workers in a retirement home in russia to do those Polikarpovs in full factory finish. The only thing that will be different is that they are most likely powered by a ASh-62 instead of a M-25, as the former is still in production
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types ««
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.