Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Complex pilot
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Complex pilot (Read 632 times)
Jun 29
th
, 2011 at 4:39pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
Well I have finally joined the ranks of those pilots who hide their landing gear. I am now checked out on the local Comanche, PA-24-180. Have to say, a very nice flying airplane, even on a hot bumpy day. I hope to be getting more time in it soon!
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 8:48am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Congrats! Let us know if you ever manage to land it smoothly... I've heard they're not as forgiving as the other low-wing Piper singles.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 10:51am
-Crossfire-
Offline
Colonel
Northern Canada
Gender:
Posts: 954
Welcome to the retractable club!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 1:01pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Now.. never takeoff ina retract Cessna, without checking the gear-pump reservoir (in the baggage compartment)..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 4:09pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
beaky wrote
on Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 8:48am:
Congrats! Let us know if you ever manage to land it smoothly... I've heard they're not as forgiving as the other low-wing Piper singles.
I actually haven't done too bad, better than my usual landings in the Cherokee and the Archer. First landing was simulated engine out, not to bad for first time in a new plane. Second landing was picture perfect crosswind, upwind wheel first, then other main, then nose, heard each chirp individually. Biggest thing, you have to try to land it almost like a taildragger, because normal nose up attitude is level in the Commanche.
Biggest differences for me with this plane were the massive amounts of right rudder needed upon rotation (almost have to put the rudder pedal to the firewall), the extra speed it carries (second trip around the pattern could almost count as a cross-country by the time I set up for landing and did the GUMPS check), and the hand brake (no toe brakes in this old bird, maybe at the next annual).
All in all, I rather like the Commanche. Flies a little smoother and fast than the Archer, has a slightly larger cabin, yet still has the economical fuel burn of an Archer. Looking in trade-a-plane and controller.com, Commanche 180s are pretty affordable.
Next time I get her out, I should get a pic and post.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 1:25am
SaultFresh
Offline
Colonel
Flight Instructor, CYKZ
Woodbridge, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 134
DaveSims wrote
on Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 4:09pm:
...time I set up for landing and did the GUMPS check...
The school I did all my flying at, a student (years before I ever got there) did a gear up landing in a Seminole because he did the GUMP check, which wasn't taught or used by the school. Also, apparently a Seminole can slide pretty far.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 7:34am
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
SaultFresh wrote
on Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 1:25am:
DaveSims wrote
on Jun 30
th
, 2011 at 4:09pm:
...time I set up for landing and did the GUMPS check...
The school I did all my flying at, a student (years before I ever got there) did a gear up landing in a Seminole because he did the GUMP check, which wasn't taught or used by the school. Also, apparently a Seminole can slide pretty far.
I'm curious, if he did a GUMPS check, how did he end up with the gear up. That is the point of the mnemonic, to remember those things.
Gas on a good tank
Undercarriage down and locked
Mixture full rich
Prop full rpm
Slats/flaps
I was taught always do it three times before short final, and verify gear down three times before short final. Usually first one is just entering the pattern as you slow down and dirty up, second is abeam the touchdown point, and last is just turning final.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 1:02pm
SaultFresh
Offline
Colonel
Flight Instructor, CYKZ
Woodbridge, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 134
I think what caught him up was the undercarriage part. Then again, I'll never know what was going through the guy's head. I do know that the instructor who was in the plane with him was not paying attention, and as a result, is no longer a flight instructor, however he does still teach aerodynamics and air law. What I have heard though, is that a seminole going 85 kts with the gear up will slide pretty far on the ground, haha.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 2:11pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
SaultFresh wrote
on Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 1:02pm:
I think what caught him up was the undercarriage part. Then again, I'll never know what was going through the guy's head. I do know that the instructor who was in the plane with him was not paying attention, and as a result, is no longer a flight instructor, however he does still teach aerodynamics and air law. What I have heard though, is that a seminole going 85 kts with the gear up will slide pretty far on the ground, haha.
This gives me an idea for a new training aircraft. Build the belly of the airplane to be a big replacable skid that would take the brunt of a gear up landing, as many gear up landings result in further damage to bulkheads and total the plane. The prop and engine would have to be mounted high enough to avoid a prop strike.
Put a couple of lifting eyes to make recovery easy, just pick it up, drop the gear, and fly it again.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 2:13pm
SaultFresh
Offline
Colonel
Flight Instructor, CYKZ
Woodbridge, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 134
The funny thing is, is that the school didn't write off the aircraft. Instead they fixed it all up. They only had two multi-engined aircraft, so I've definitely flown in it since it's accident, haha.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 3:01pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
SaultFresh wrote
on Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 2:13pm:
The funny thing is, is that the school didn't write off the aircraft. Instead they fixed it all up. They only had two multi-engined aircraft, so I've definitely flown in it since it's accident, haha.
The 172RGs where I went to college seemed to wind up on their belly at least once a year. It was a never ending process to fix them.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jul 1
st
, 2011 at 6:07pm
patchz
Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS
Gender:
Posts: 10589
Congratulations Davy.
A few years before I retired, I got a call to go to the airport because an aircraft could not get the gear down. Turned out it was only the right main.
After trying for a while, he finally brought it in and did a picture perfect landing. I was a bit surprised that it slid straight down the runway and did not
turn due to the increased drag on the right side. The aircraft did not look all that bad either. But for the life of me, I can't remember what it was.
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.