Id love a c-130 with many variants, including ac-130, blue angels with jato, etc.
F-22
B-17
Of course 767
Cessna jets(don't care which)
Wheeled float planes.
Helicopters with emergency flotation systems
(Think I am getting more complicated as my list goes on  )

I think the key here is to ask for aircraft that we know are unique enough to need their own programming in the sim.  For instance, how the Concorde needed it's own animation protocols for FS2k.  So we need true VTOL capabilities.  That alone would open up a whole range of new aircraft creation.  We would also need stable flight dynamics for helo's, since that was an issue from FS2k2 on up.  Then of course there's the problems with military aircraft and their systems.  Modern mil aircraft have such integrated electronics and functions that we have had huge issues in programming gauges (or more specifically: panels) that could emulate the functions of some of these aircraft.  So we need at least one or two mil aircraft, preferably a fighter and a transport.  Also, having some functions that simulate the more obscure tech from different eras would also be nice, like gyrocopters and jetpack prototypes, as well as ducted fans and perhaps even a way to simulate flapping wings similar to a real bird.  Perhaps some of these are a bit out there on the edge, but it would be interesting to see this type of thing take shape.

EDIT: I almost forgot about multiple engine types!  JATO would be awesome, as well as a way to simulate ramjets or even scramjets!  Of course, just the ability to utilize rockets and then another form of engine would be pretty cool, too.

kev13479 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2010 at 7:56pm:


I'm not sure what you mean by these two statements.

The clouds: flying through them is fairly accurate in the last two FS installments, when the clouds are set high.

As for the cockpits, I know for a fact that the last two flight sims have had designers sitting in the cockpits of the various aircraft, photographing and studying the layouts.  Most of the aircraft were photorealistic, and all of them were accurate to the blueprints/diagrams of said aircraft.  So what was missing?

I think everyone just forgets about the Maule. I like it too, but I just don't use it enough. 
Also, MS, keep the Goose. That's a fun one!

Travis, what im saying is, well they only make one variation of the cockpits. They should make more than one cockpit for each aircraft.

and the defult clouds dont quite have the IFR in them.

Travis,
by the realism standards, well i only fly the C172 in real life so i cant judge any of the other aircraft, but the C172 in the flight sim didnt have the feel of the real one, like the speed and the effects (e.x: flaps dont have real effect in the sim)  as they would in real life.
they did a good job non the less ill say that, but this time i think im saying they should step it up a knotch you know what i mean?

Travis wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2010 at 4:04am:

i realize that.....but the thread is called "what we WISH"

i'll probably end up adding them all myself....and im fine with that!

littlebenny wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2010 at 4:42am:

yeah man great idea i love the harrier jump jet
and the vertical take-off
keep posting ideas' s