Simviation Forum - Dodging lead.

Jun 30^th, 2010 at 4:32pm

eno Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK

Posts: 7802

A 3D render depicting the war over the Pacific.

enjoy
eno

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Jun 30^th, 2010 at 4:54pm

Frequent Flyer Offline
Colonel
It's SuperCaliFragilIstic
EspiAliDocious!
Lucy's Sky with Diamonds

Posts: 1569

Once again, fantastic!
What's the difference between a normal composite and a "3D render"?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Jun 30^th, 2010 at 5:41pm

ShaneG Offline
Colonel
I turned into a Martian!

Posts: 10000

Frequent Flyer wrote on Jun 30^th, 2010 at 4:54pm:

What's the difference between a normal composite and a "3D render"?

The planes in this picture,

were created for the sole purpose of making this pic.

They're not from, or for, any flight simulator. Wink

♪♫♪‼

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Jun 30^th, 2010 at 6:12pm

BoeingGuy Ex Member

Frequent Flyer wrote on Jun 30^th, 2010 at 4:54pm:

Once again, fantastic!

What he said.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Jun 30^th, 2010 at 6:29pm

FuturePilot Offline
Colonel
FSX Gold
Grand Cayman

Gender:
Posts: 1544

Wow!

ASUS M4A89GTD, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 160GB 10,000 RPM HDD + 1TB 7200 RPM HDD, AMD Phenom II x4 965BE 3.4 GHz OC @ 3.8 GHz, 1GB EVGA GeForce GDDR5 GPU

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Jul 1^st, 2010 at 2:24am

eno Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK

Posts: 7802

Frequent Flyer wrote on Jun 30^th, 2010 at 4:54pm:

What's the difference between a normal composite and a "3D render"?

What Shane said ........... with the addition of the fact that in the rendering program you can move round and through the image to set the shot up as well as posing the models. In theory....... and with patience and lots of time and processing power you could make a movie flying through and round the image with both you and the aircraft moving independently.

I will also add that the models in the renders I produce are not built by me.... although that might change in the future as I get used to the rendering software.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Jul 1^st, 2010 at 3:34am

patchz Offline
Colonel
What, me worry?
IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Gender:
Posts: 10589

eno wrote on Jul 1^st, 2010 at 2:24am:

Frequent Flyer wrote on Jun 30^th, 2010 at 4:54pm:

What's the difference between a normal composite and a "3D render"?

What Shane said ........... with the addition of the fact that in the rendering program you can move round and through the image to set the shot up as well as posing the models. In theory....... and with patience and lots of time and processing power you could make a movie flying through and round the image with both you and the aircraft moving independently.

I will also add that the models in the renders I produce are not built by me.... although that might change in the future as I get used to the rendering software.

I don't know what program you are using, but with Bryce, it is not just theory. But even low resolution movies of short length are very large in file size. This example is 200 x 150 and only about 3 seconds but is 97kb, after compression.

http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/LandingBay1ani.gif

Having some limited knowledge of 3D rendering and short movies I can really appreciate the quality of eno's edits.

If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: