Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Kid directs traffic at JFK (Read 2403 times)
Mar 3rd, 2010 at 2:40pm

specter177   Offline
Colonel
Check out the Maverick
Flying Car!
I-TEC - X35

Gender: male
Posts: 1406
*****
 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,587801,00.html

Discuss.
Personally, I think taking his kid there was fine, but actually letting him talk to planes was crossing the line.
 

......
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 2:45pm
SeanTK   Ex Member

 
Based on what they actually let the kid do, I don't really see a problem with it, as long as it doesn't become a common occurrence. He was not giving aircraft movement instructions, and besides that, he had a professional controller (the father) AND a supervisor there to make sure everything went smoothly. It was a very, very controlled situation, with what I believe to be ZERO chance of risk.

Again, I wouldn't want them to make a habit out of bringing the kid in, but for a one or two time occasional thing, it didn't seem to harm anything. Adding to that, everyone involved in the moment (pilots, controllers, etc.) seemed to really enjoy it, and to specify again, according to the article, all he was doing was giving handoff instructions after being told exactly what to say.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 2:51pm

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
I think that this is going to be blown so sky high that it will be on Mars gathering dust so long that NASA, if they ever get their will in the headlines for coming second. Sorry, but a total none story, but the selling of papers and a nice class action by "traumatised" passengers who found out when they arrived it was their aircraft and saw $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and a life in the sun is what it is about. How about asking the pilots involved what they think/thought and if any thought safety was compromised to file the relevant paperwork and not have a couple of people hung out to dry by a media frenzy....as usual.
A "great day out for your child Bill, but it was ill advised, don't do it again" is all that is required.

Matt (preparing for the critical onslaught)
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 3rd, 2010 at 4:04pm

machineman9   Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England

Gender: male
Posts: 5255
*****
 
The only 'bad points' I can see is the 'adios amigo' and the giggling in the background. Besides that, the job got done.

I mean, rules are rules. You shouldn't let your young child drive your car around even though he was being supervised by two people. He shouldn't have been there, but no harm was caused.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 12:52pm

specter177   Offline
Colonel
Check out the Maverick
Flying Car!
I-TEC - X35

Gender: male
Posts: 1406
*****
 
Normally I would agree, but aviation has taken too many hits recently, and this is just one more. Public confidence is being shaken, and things like this only hurt the aviation industry.
 

......
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 4:13pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
While I do believe this story is getting blown way out of proportion, i think if this guy would have stopped to think about what he was doing, and WHERE he was doing it, he might have made different choices.  If this had happened at some backwoods airport control tower, no one would have noticed or cared, but at JFK?   Roll Eyes  This day in age, with the media as it is, one must always be aware of appearances, and how seemingly innocent actions can be made out to be criminal.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 5:37pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Dangerous? Probably not.

Ill advised? Almost certainly.

Worth a slap on the wrist? Very much so.


There's a time and a place. Tower freq at a busy international probably isn't it. Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 7:48pm

Flying Trucker   Offline
Colonel
An Old Retired Rocking
Chair Flying Geezer

Gender: male
Posts: 11425
*****
 
Good evening all... Smiley

Having thought this over a number of times and reminiscing the past and believe me that was the most difficult part I have to agree with the above post.

I think "C" you put it into perspective. 

I remember the day when we could allow members of the immediate family and close friends into the cockpit of an aircraft while in flight.  I guess those days are gone for many.  Sad really.   Lips Sealed
Did 911 bring that on, no not really, it was something that was going to happen sooner or later however these sort of things have a short life span, believe me, I have been around aviation too long and seen this before. Closing off the cockpit or tower does not stop someone committed to blowing up an airplane, it only serves to aid the terrorist propaganda machine. 

If I had a question on this it would be:
Asking the difference between "Stupidity" and "Security".

Cheers..Happy Landings..Doug
 

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Mar 4th, 2010 at 9:24pm

olderndirt   Offline
Colonel
Flying is PFM
Rochester, WA

Gender: male
Posts: 3574
*****
 
Been reading this and wondering if I had anything worth saying.  One thought did pass my frontal lobe, this fanaticism some parents have about getting their kids in the limelight.  We've all seen pictures of little girls, made up to and beyond the nines, being feverishly promoted by one or both parents as the next Shirley Temple.  Maybe some of this parental 'this is my kid, ain't he/she the greatest' syndrome was part of the JFK event.  One thing, I'll never understand, is what, besides that first cold one at the end of the shift, was that supervisor thinking about?
 

... 

                            
THIS IS NOT A PANAM CLIPPER

                                                            
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 8:49am

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
Most of what I heard, were the scripted broadcasts even GA pilots are familiar with..

"cleared for takeoff"  ..  "contact approach"  etc.

All the "controlling" had already been done. Pilots don't even pay special attention to those broadcasts, other than listening for something OTHER than what they  KNOW the controller will be saying.

So long as he wasn't issuing clearances.. and interpreting read-backs.. or handling spacing and seperation directions..

WHO  CARES  !?

And even if it were something other than routine..  a bright kid with two experiened adults looking over his shoulder is probably safer that a tired controller at the end of a long shift.

This is more about the media's need to make news... and a government bureaucracy posturing for an ignorant public's benefit.   Angry
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 10:42am

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Brett_Henderson wrote on Mar 5th, 2010 at 8:49am:
Most of what I heard, were the scripted broadcasts even GA pilots are familiar with..

"cleared for takeoff"  ..  "contact approach"  etc.

All the "controlling" had already been done. Pilots don't even pay special attention to those broadcasts, other than listening for something OTHER than what they  KNOW the controller will be saying.

So long as he wasn't issuing clearances.. and interpreting read-backs.. or handling spacing and seperation directions..

WHO  CARES  !?

And even if it were something other than routine..  a bright kid with two experiened adults looking over his shoulder is probably safer that a tired controller at the end of a long shift.

This is more about the media's need to make news... and a government bureaucracy posturing for an ignorant public's benefit.   Angry

I agree, on all points.
It's not much different, in effect, than any controller injecting a little levity on-mic (while of course doing their job properly). They do that, from time to time, and nobody cares, as long as the traffic is flowing safely.
The kid made no decisions, and I would bet my life that he said only what he was told to say (including the "adios amigo"), and when to say it . He probably wasn't even the one pushing the mic key.

He spoke clearly,the pilots loved it, smiles all around, efficiency and safety were not compromised even one iota... no actual harm done.


The only thing that bugs me about it is that this controller must have realized that A) it is definitely "non-standard" and would be frowned upon by his employers and  B) that there would be hell to pay for it if the public found out.
So... why do it?? Was it worth it for him? Does he realize the damage he has done to his industry, and flying in general?
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 11:02am

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
Quote:
So... why do it?? Was it worth it for him? Does he realize the damage he has done to his industry, and flying in general?


Yeah  *sigh*..  I wish he hadn't done it.. but I wish even more, that it could all be taken in context.

I don't want bureacratic robots in a tower, anymore than I'd want them running a police department. I trust his decision to do this, as much as I trust the decision of a police officer to not issue a speeding ticket to everyone going 1mph over the limit.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 1:01pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
I remember the good ole days of ATC, back when the BTR approach control would give out the LSU score with the altimeter setting.  Wink  That would probably be a career ending mistake these days.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 4:26pm

SaultFresh   Offline
Colonel
Flight Instructor, CYKZ
Woodbridge, Ontario

Gender: male
Posts: 134
*****
 
I personally think this is awesome, haha. I think on that day, a dream could've been sparked, so was it all worth it, yeah, in the sense that seeding hopeful dreams in a young kid is a great experience. Now, I kinda don't think that it should have been done at JFK, but if it had been done at some smaller airport, I think that's great. I mean, my airport here in Canada isn't really busy, even on a busy day, haha. If the Tower controller brought his kid to work and I got to talk to him or her over the radio, that would make my day, and it would probably make the kids day too. Overall, I think that kid is pretty lucky, I never got to sit in a cockpit when I was a kid, and I certainly never got to go in tower either. I also never went to work with my dad, which could possibly be why I decided to do something different career wise, haha. I don't believe any harm was done, it was not out of control, and I think that guy is a pretty cool dad, I hope he doesn't catch too much flak from this.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 5:56pm

JoBee   Offline
Colonel
Better to give than receive.

Posts: 582
*****
 
Somewhere some FAA lawyer is gonna say "we have to be careful about setting a precedent. If we slap this guy on the wrist, some other controller is gonna think "I'll take a slap on the wrist so my little Johnny can talk on the radio too""

This guy, and his boss are going to get canned.

In my opinion the tower needs to be as sterile an environment as the cockpit and having these kids in the tower had to be a distraction.

And if you don't think bad things can happen real fast in the ATC world, watch this - http://www.faa.gov/airports/runway_safety/videos/media/simulation.html

Yeah, these guys are going to get canned, and I think it is justified.

cheers,
Joe
 

Don't argue with idiots, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Mar 5th, 2010 at 7:14pm

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
I'm gonna remain a little cavalier on this.

I trust the judgement of these guys.. and I trust the judgement of pilots.. None of them had a problem with it.. I'd put the opinion of an FAA attorney so far down the trust list, that it wouldn't matter.

Every pilot, controller, AP guy, instructor and student I've discussed it with, all agree it's a big, "Who cares?"

When this happened, everybody (the controller, his boss, all the other controllers in the tower) not only knew it was happening.. they knew that every pilot with his radio on would know it.. and they knew it was being taped.. I'm completely confident that no safety was compromised.. if anything, all parties in the tower were extra vigillant.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Mar 6th, 2010 at 3:12am

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
Brett_Henderson wrote on Mar 5th, 2010 at 7:14pm:
I'm gonna remain a little cavalier on this.

I trust the judgement of these guys.. and I trust the judgement of pilots.. None of them had a problem with it.. I'd put the opinion of an FAA attorney so far down the trust list, that it wouldn't matter.

Every pilot, controller, AP guy, instructor and student I've discussed it with, all agree it's a big, "Who cares?"

When this happened, everybody (the controller, his boss, all the other controllers in the tower) not only knew it was happening.. they knew that every pilot with his radio on would know it.. and they knew it was being taped.. I'm completely confident that no safety was compromised.. if anything, all parties in the tower were extra vigillant.




At the end of the day the only people who care about it are the aviation armchair experts and the news media trying to sell a story and the FAA because they have too and rightly so. The rest have seen there was no safety risk. No pilots have made a formal complaint and if anyone should be concerned it would be them. There is a lesson to be learnt, that being "this will not be happening again people, first and last time". There is no requirement to lynch anyone. As Bret said, it was done in front of many people and recorded, not to mention all the spotters with air-band radios. It was not as if they even made the smallest attempt to cover it up and that would have been reason for trouble. I hope that the only thing to come out of this is the ingnition of the spark of imagination in a small child.

Matt
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Mar 9th, 2010 at 9:10pm

ViperPilot   Offline
Colonel
KLMO Denver, CO USA

Gender: male
Posts: 211
*****
 
Hello!

Been following this story for a couple of days, and saw something interesting:

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/03/pilots-say-adios-to-support-suspended-contr...

Then I remembered something I heard on YouTube a while back that's kinda related to this story, and if you haven't heard it, here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK8f8HQfDxY

Now... after hearing this clip, I wondered what happened to the pilot & the controllers after the FAA heard about it... do you think they yanked the pilot's ticket & fired the controllers? I don't think so. I think the FAA needs to relax a little bit here. Sure, it was at JFK instead of Prescott, AZ but look... the kid had his dad there and a supervisor watching everything he said to make sure it was kosher; it wasn't like the kid was handling a squawk 7700 or something...

Just my 2¢ worth, but Man, did Jessi sound cute!

Alan  Smiley
 

[...
"I created the Little Black Book to keep myself from getting killed..."
-- Captain Elrey Borge Jeppesen

P4 3.0 SINGLE CORE, 2GB Corsair RAM, ATI Radeon 4650 1GB, OCZ 600w PSU, Samsung 160GB HD XP SP3

Proud User of: FS8 FS9 CFS CFS2 IL2
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Mar 9th, 2010 at 9:49pm

specter177   Offline
Colonel
Check out the Maverick
Flying Car!
I-TEC - X35

Gender: male
Posts: 1406
*****
 
He and his supervisor were suspended for an amount of time, I don't know how long exactly.
 

......
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:21am

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
The FAA's hands are really tied on this one though.  While most pilots and controllers agree its a non issue, the uneducated media, and the uneducated politicians, would crucify the FAA if they failed to do anything.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:50am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
DaveSims wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:21am:
The FAA's hands are really tied on this one though.  While most pilots and controllers agree its a non issue.


I'd be interested to see who initially reported it to the authorities. Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Mar 10th, 2010 at 2:23pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
C wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:50am:
DaveSims wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:21am:
The FAA's hands are really tied on this one though.  While most pilots and controllers agree its a non issue.


I'd be interested to see who initially reported it to the authorities. Smiley



From what I've seen, someone (anonymous) recorded the LiveATC broadcast, and turned it over to the local media.  That is when the authorities got involved.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Mar 10th, 2010 at 4:13pm

Tyler012   Offline
Colonel
My Soul is in the Sky
KLBB

Gender: male
Posts: 201
*****
 
money money money money. thats all it came down to.
 

...
Just a sample of my personal art.
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Mar 10th, 2010 at 5:40pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
DaveSims wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 2:23pm:
C wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:50am:
DaveSims wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:21am:
The FAA's hands are really tied on this one though.  While most pilots and controllers agree its a non issue.


I'd be interested to see who initially reported it to the authorities. Smiley



From what I've seen, someone (anonymous) recorded the LiveATC broadcast, and turned it over to the local media.  That is when the authorities got involved.


Ah, righto. Just shows that in the aviation community/business you really do need to keep yourself squeeky clean these days. Something as innocent as this just isn't wise anymore. Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Mar 10th, 2010 at 5:50pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
DaveSims wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 2:23pm:
C wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:50am:
DaveSims wrote on Mar 10th, 2010 at 7:21am:
The FAA's hands are really tied on this one though.  While most pilots and controllers agree its a non issue.


I'd be interested to see who initially reported it to the authorities. Smiley



From what I've seen, someone (anonymous) recorded the LiveATC broadcast, and turned it over to the local media.  That is when the authorities got involved.

Seems rather ironic when the whistle-blower could have been jailed in some countries for listening to ATC transmissions. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article7035874.ece
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print