Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Zaon MRX PCAS traffic avoidance system (Read 355 times)
Dec 12th, 2009 at 2:05pm

RitterKreuz   Offline
Colonel
Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1253
*****
 
Anyone have any experience with these?

...

I purchased this model the other day and took it on a short trip to try it out. The MRX works by detecting your transponder's Mode C output. It then detects Mode C replies from other such equipped aircraft and monitors the closest "threat". So... if an aircraft is not equipped with a mode C transponder, the unit wont detect that particular "threat aircraft".

Unfortunately, while testing, the short trip i was on went through an area of relatively low traffic density.

I had set the unit to 5.0NM range and +/-5,000 ft altitude... the whole way over it showed "--.- nm ---ft" meaning "no traffic"

once we were within about 3 miles of the destination airport a Robinson R44 helicopter departed the ramp and headed Northwest (toward us) at about 1500 ft MSL.

our altitude was 2500ft MSL.

within a few seconds after the chopper became airborne the little unit beeped twice, the indication that a new aircraft had been detected (4 beeps is an alert for close proximity).

the blank screen was replaced with "2.0NM -011FT" indicating that we had traffic 2 miles away, 1,100 ft below us.

we estimated the distance visually to be about 1.5 - 2 miles. so the range was accurate, and the helicopter announced his intent to depart at 1500 MSL while we remained at 2500 MSL this meant that there was about 1,000 foot vertical separation. so the little unit was about as correct as you would expect.

eventually the distance counted up to 5.0NM and went blank as the helicopter went further away from us.

on final approach, a Cardinal RG sat waiting for takeoff... the unit picked him up and eventually issued an "ALERT!" as we closed within 1NM and 500 ft vertical separation.

as we neared the ground for landing, signal quality became nil and the unit stopped announcing traffic.

On the return leg, same story, no traffic was encountered except for one aircraft that came within "1.5NM +029" (1.5 miles and 2900 ft above) which placed them well above the overcast cloud layer so - we never saw them to make a visual confirmation of the unit's indication.

As we neared our home airport, a king air departed toward us, we had no visual on the aircraft and the unit did not indicate any traffic.

I can only assume that the King air - being operated by a local "cowboy type" aircraft salesman - failed to activate his transponder before takeoff. thereby rendering the MRX unit incapable of locating the king air.

I look forward to further testing when the weather clears in a day or two.

for now my verdict is mostly positive.

we had 1 aircraft definitively tagged up on the MRX... and the range and altitude differential was pretty darned accurate in my opinion

we had a 2nd aircraft that was detected, and the unit alerted us to close proximity, but as we neared the ground - understandably the mode c reply of the threat aircraft would be less and less pronounced so... i cant blame the unit for "trailing off" of this contact.

We had a 3rd aircraft that the unit detected well above us, but because of the overcast, we couldnt visually verify the traffic's proximity in comparison with the LED indication on the screen.

Finally, we had a 4th aircraft that was acquired and avoided visually, but that the MRX did not detect - Possibly... in fact very probably because the aircraft did not have his transponder on.

I wont give it two thumbs way up just yet... but im on the way to giving the MRX my approval  Smiley Im pretty impressed with it so far.

I would like to see 3 or 4 more MRX detections that i can verify visually before i "recommend" anyone buy this product.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Dec 12th, 2009 at 2:07pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
I got the chance to fly a T182RG that had one of these on the dash.  Lets just say, its amazing how many aircraft we fail to notice around us.  On a 2 hour trip, we were alerted to over a dozen aircraft, that we all agreed we wouldn't have spotted otherwise.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Dec 12th, 2009 at 2:11pm

RitterKreuz   Offline
Colonel
Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1253
*****
 
Exactly!  Shocked

Its obviously no substitute for the pilots eyes when it comes to "see and avoid" rules.

however, it is VERY comforting when the little box beeps and says "Hey... heads up man, there is another plane out there."
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 12:00am

RitterKreuz   Offline
Colonel
Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1253
*****
 
UPDATE:

I took the MRX up again today on a cross country flight.

davysims said it best when he wrote "its amazing how many aircraft we fail to notice around us"

and he is correct... probably half a dozen aircraft i never would have seen had i not been using the Zaon MRX at the time.

I highly recommend this product to any active pilot with $470 to burn

if it saves your bacon once... it has paid for itself a million times over.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Dec 17th, 2009 at 7:45am

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
The only downside to this unit, it only detects radar replies from a Mode C transponder.  If you are in a non radar environment, this device will not detect anything, since transponders do not transmit until interrogated by radar.  There is another unit that actually transmits a signal to get the transponder to reply, but it cost about $1500 I believe. 

In most areas of the country it isn't a big issue, but where I live we don't have radar coverage below 4000 feet due to distance from the nearest transmitter.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print