Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Design Forums
›
Aircraft & 3D Design
› Little help with speed
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
Little help with speed (Read 1669 times)
Reply #15 -
Mar 16
th
, 2010 at 6:02pm
Dickert
Offline
Colonel
Does it ever fly fast
enough?
Ontario Canada
Gender:
Posts: 170
Hi Jake,
I installed your aircraft and the first thing that happened when I started FS9 is it updated the scenery files? What is that all about? Also, there are some files for the gauges directory, did you progam those or are they freeware you picked up somewhere? And what about that Auto Pilot?
Next, what are you talking about when you say it will not go fast. On my confuser it went up to Mach 4.04 at sea level with only a little shaking, and I got Mach 4.65 at FL500 with the aircraft smooth as silk. Other aircraft will have the elevator fludder at those speeds but non on yours. Pulling up on the elevator at Mach 4.+ and it's momentum had me hitting the 100,000 ft barrier in no time. The hardest part of flying this thing was keeping the screen from blacking out with high G's. My own aircraft design starts to become pitch sensitive at FL400.
I like the chrome effect on the engines and leading edges. Do you have a tutorial on how to do that. I can't seem to get that kind of shine on my aircraft.
I found the cockpit windows restrictive and you should add more glass. There are no side windows? Hard to do a visual circuit that way...
Also the engines seem physically small for the size of the aircraft and the power they put out.
So you are leaving me with a lot of questions .... "How did he do that?"
I can see there are a bunch of things to finish off, but over all - Very Cool!!!
Harold
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Mar 17
th
, 2010 at 3:38am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
Dickert wrote
on Mar 16
th
, 2010 at 6:02pm:
Hi Jake,
I installed your aircraft and the first thing that happened when I started FS9 is it updated the scenery files? What is that all about? Also, there are some files for the gauges directory, did you progam those or are they freeware you picked up somewhere? And what about that Auto Pilot?
Next, what are you talking about when you say it will not go fast. On my confuser it went up to Mach 4.04 at sea level with only a little shaking, and I got Mach 4.65 at FL500 with the aircraft smooth as silk. Other aircraft will have the elevator fludder at those speeds but non on yours. Pulling up on the elevator at Mach 4.+ and it's momentum had me hitting the 100,000 ft barrier in no time. The hardest part of flying this thing was keeping the screen from blacking out with high G's. My own aircraft design starts to become pitch sensitive at FL400.
I like the chrome effect on the engines and leading edges. Do you have a tutorial on how to do that. I can't seem to get that kind of shine on my aircraft.
I found the cockpit windows restrictive and you should add more glass. There are no side windows? Hard to do a visual circuit that way...
Also the engines seem physically small for the size of the aircraft and the power they put out.
So you are leaving me with a lot of questions .... "How did he do that?"
I can see there are a bunch of things to finish off, but over all - Very Cool!!!
Harold
Thanks Harold,
It is strange that it updated your scenery, as I've downloaded it myself and installed on my notebook a week ago, with no problem? As for the gauges, they are all freeware found on SimV, did not do any programming. When it is officially released I will give credit to the developers
Also the MACH 4 is very weird?? maybe you can email the aircraft.cfg file? would like to have a look at it, and compare it with mine?
The windows... wel yeah, I realised it does not give good circuit outlook. I think I will add side windows... All work to be done. I does not have a tutorial on the chrome leading edges, but will compile something and send it to you!. Thank you for all the advice!
My email address is johan@jdsarc.co.za
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Mar 18
th
, 2010 at 6:20pm
Thud
Offline
Colonel
KEVB/KDAB
Gender:
Posts: 485
Yeah I had the same thing with speed. Also when I was going around Mach 4 at sea level, I pulled straight up, barley lost any speed on the way, and made it to 400,000 ft. Hard to perform reentry
But other than that I really like your plane, looking forward for the finished version.
Windows Vista (32bit) HP Pavilion a6000 E2180 @2.00 GHz 500GB Seagate Barracuda 7200 3GB RAM IPIB-LB Motherboard Nvidia 512MB 9800 GT
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Mar 20
th
, 2010 at 4:28am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
Complaining about a superfast jet?? Hehe. Thank you for the feedback,wil have a look into that.!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Mar 21
st
, 2010 at 5:55pm
jaime
Offline
Colonel
I can haz fail now?
Posts: 248
seemes we just found a new replacement for the old shuttle....self powered too...WIN!
anyways the speed set up I had previously wasn't working right for you or did you need to tweek it more? if its still having issues where is the most current version so I can take a look and see whats going on? or is the one on your site the most current as of this month?
also the camera position is (at least IMO) way too far back, im working on fine tuning that and resolving that, as for the speed bit it seems rather stable...in fact maybe a tad slower then I want in the sense of what its supposed to do...
one of the starters of the burner pandemic
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Mar 23
rd
, 2010 at 6:36am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
Hi Jaime,
The speed is not a problem, but keeping it realistic with the real world is. To achieve Mach 1.6 is Easy, but you dont want to reach 120 KIAS in 2 seconds. So there must be a balance in all. The difficulty comes in with the variable geometry wings. And I like to experiment with the CFG, I learn a lot this way!
Thanks for the feedback!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Mar 23
rd
, 2010 at 11:38pm
jaime
Offline
Colonel
I can haz fail now?
Posts: 248
i agree it shouldnt reach mach 1.6 in 2 seconds...as for the variable wings, I would suggest another setting, one that allows the wings to be 100% extended (open) with flaps UP, then the next setting (or settings depending on what you want) should involve the flaps extending...would make it a bit more realistic since when I travel at less then mach speeds I would like to have the wings full open with flaps UP and not extended kinda thing...(I hope this makes sense to you) its kinda like the F-14 tomcat...
one of the starters of the burner pandemic
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Mar 24
th
, 2010 at 3:00am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
jaime wrote
on Mar 23
rd
, 2010 at 11:38pm:
i agree it shouldnt reach mach 1.6 in 2 seconds...as for the variable wings, I would suggest another setting, one that allows the wings to be 100% extended (open) with flaps UP, then the next setting (or settings depending on what you want) should involve the flaps extending...would make it a bit more realistic since when I travel at less then mach speeds I would like to have the wings full open with flaps UP and not extended kinda thing...(I hope this makes sense to you) its kinda like the F-14 tomcat...
when you tested the aircraft you would have noticed that the flaps already control the variable wings. The tricky part is to incorporate the flap settings with the wing gometry/performance.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Mar 24
th
, 2010 at 8:34am
Thud
Offline
Colonel
KEVB/KDAB
Gender:
Posts: 485
About those swing wings, I can't get them to work.
Windows Vista (32bit) HP Pavilion a6000 E2180 @2.00 GHz 500GB Seagate Barracuda 7200 3GB RAM IPIB-LB Motherboard Nvidia 512MB 9800 GT
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Mar 24
th
, 2010 at 9:50am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
Thud wrote
on Mar 24
th
, 2010 at 8:34am:
About those swing wings, I can't get them to work.
The normal flaps (F5 -F8)?Strange?? tell me what Sim you are using? I haven't test it completely on FSX, but had good feedback from FSX testers. ??
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Mar 28
th
, 2010 at 11:22am
Thud
Offline
Colonel
KEVB/KDAB
Gender:
Posts: 485
Oh, I tried it with F5-F8 just now, it works fine, I usually use F6-F7.
Windows Vista (32bit) HP Pavilion a6000 E2180 @2.00 GHz 500GB Seagate Barracuda 7200 3GB RAM IPIB-LB Motherboard Nvidia 512MB 9800 GT
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Mar 29
th
, 2010 at 3:10am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
Thud wrote
on Mar 28
th
, 2010 at 11:22am:
Oh, I tried it with F5-F8 just now, it works fine, I usually use F6-F7.
I noticed that there is a certain range that the flaps (swing wings) dont animate. If wings are full forward, and you press F6, it does not animate, but when you press it several times, it works. I will have a look into that. Thanks for letting me know!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Apr 10
th
, 2010 at 11:44pm
jaime
Offline
Colonel
I can haz fail now?
Posts: 248
JakesF14 wrote
on Mar 24
th
, 2010 at 3:00am:
jaime wrote
on Mar 23
rd
, 2010 at 11:38pm:
i agree it shouldnt reach mach 1.6 in 2 seconds...as for the variable wings, I would suggest another setting, one that allows the wings to be 100% extended (open) with flaps UP, then the next setting (or settings depending on what you want) should involve the flaps extending...would make it a bit more realistic since when I travel at less then mach speeds I would like to have the wings full open with flaps UP and not extended kinda thing...(I hope this makes sense to you) its kinda like the F-14 tomcat...
when you tested the aircraft you would have noticed that the flaps already control the variable wings. The tricky part is to incorporate the flap settings with the wing gometry/performance.
hmmmm...ok...but do you have any plan to set it up so someone could have the flaps all the way up (stowed) with the wings full open, or both (I know it may be tricky but I think it would make it more realistic since most swing wings out there can have the wings full open with flaps up)
Oh and I have been using the plane with FSX and its been nothing but more or less smooth working, except for a few very minor things which I shouldn't have an issue correcting...IE camera possition in flight deck (behind the seat...)
one of the starters of the burner pandemic
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Apr 12
th
, 2010 at 8:55am
JakesF14
Offline
Colonel
Blistering Barnacles!
South Africa
Gender:
Posts: 1866
jaime wrote
on Apr 10
th
, 2010 at 11:44pm:
JakesF14 wrote
on Mar 24
th
, 2010 at 3:00am:
jaime wrote
on Mar 23
rd
, 2010 at 11:38pm:
i agree it shouldnt reach mach 1.6 in 2 seconds...as for the variable wings, I would suggest another setting, one that allows the wings to be 100% extended (open) with flaps UP, then the next setting (or settings depending on what you want) should involve the flaps extending...would make it a bit more realistic since when I travel at less then mach speeds I would like to have the wings full open with flaps UP and not extended kinda thing...(I hope this makes sense to you) its kinda like the F-14 tomcat...
when you tested the aircraft you would have noticed that the flaps already control the variable wings. The tricky part is to incorporate the flap settings with the wing gometry/performance.
hmmmm...ok...but do you have any plan to set it up so someone could have the flaps all the way up (stowed) with the wings full open, or both (I know it may be tricky but I think it would make it more realistic since most swing wings out there can have the wings full open with flaps up)
Yes,
When full flaps, just select three notches back (3x F6), you should have wings forward without flaps.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Apr 12
th
, 2010 at 8:34pm
jaime
Offline
Colonel
I can haz fail now?
Posts: 248
tried that and the wings only go full open with flaps down
I can do one notch back and that usually is ok for me at this time but I hope in the future they will have the ability to go full open with out flaps...but I love the plane and have a nice flight each day with it
hope you will continue working on it...oh and I do have a NASA paint scheme on it also
looks awesome!
one of the starters of the burner pandemic
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design ««
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.