Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
A question that was never answered (Read 1574 times)
Nov 8th, 2009 at 9:16pm

Jersey Flyer   Offline
Colonel
New Jerseys where its
at.
Newark, New jersey

Gender: male
Posts: 212
*****
 
Okay, so i hear this question being shot around all the time at my flight school, and I feel stupid asking this question BUT... what exactly is the difference between getting Part 61 and Part 141 training? I'm currently working on my private in a Cessna Skyhawk (SP/G1000) and I know that I am part 141, but I don't quite know exactly what that means...  Undecided
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Nov 8th, 2009 at 9:25pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
Part 141 is a certification flight schools can get.  Basically they must meet several requirement, curriculum, paperwork, etc.  In return they can call themselves a certified flight school and the minimum flight times for your license and ratings is reduced. Learning to fly Part 61 is just showing up at the airport with an airplane and a flight instructor, and doing whatever the instructor decides.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Nov 9th, 2009 at 12:12am

BSW727   Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to SimV.
Inside a Boeing 727

Gender: male
Posts: 202
*****
 
Part 141 is much more structured and a syllabus is used. Many colleges and jr. colleges are 141 certified. I rather liked the structured aspect of a syllabus.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Nov 9th, 2009 at 12:51am

Splinter562   Offline
Colonel
Tampa, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 217
*****
 
One other thing worth mentioning: The decision to train under Part 61 or Part 141 will not affect your flying career in the long term. At the end of your training, you will take the same checkride and receive the same certificate no matter which route you take. Also, if you receive a private under Part 141, you could do an instrument under Part 61, or vice-versa.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Nov 10th, 2009 at 2:52pm

Jersey Flyer   Offline
Colonel
New Jerseys where its
at.
Newark, New jersey

Gender: male
Posts: 212
*****
 
Okay I didn't know that, but thank you. I guess 141 is best for me because I'm a type of person that loves detailed explinations on things, thank you all!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Nov 10th, 2009 at 9:09pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Don't get the impression that Part 61 is always like something out of the old days, with an instructor turning you loose to solo after the first time you land the plane without him having to rescue you, then telling you what to read before taking the written, then crossing his fingers that the examiner on your check ride is in a good mood that day. It can be very thorough.

I did my PPASEL training under Part 61, and we followed a FAA-approved syllabus (the Jeppeson syllabus). I soloed before I did any XCs, even dual XCs; I took a written quiz before I soloed; I flew stage checks, and attended formal ground school sessions. If I wanted very detailed explanations, I usually got them, or found them myself. Sometimes I got very detailed explanations without asking!!  Wink  Grin


This is not the case with every Part 61 operation, but it is not very unusual, as far as I know.


So what's the real difference between 61 and 141? Required minimum hours for certification (that is, for being allowed to take the check ride).

PPASEL:
Under Part 61: 40 hrs
Part 141: 35 hrs

PP-C (commercial):
Part 61: 250 hrs
Part 141: 190 hrs



So, in essence, because a school is entitled in the eyes of the FAA to write "Part 141" next to your endorsements, they can get you on your way with less total time. A PArt 61 operation can be run exactly the same way as a PArt 141 operation, but they are not allowed to let you take the PP check ride with less than 40 hrs total time, or the commercial with less than 250.


Now, as far as the school is concerned, there are other differences (paperwork, mgmt. structure, etc), and 141 schools can offer training under special foreign visa and veterans' benefits programs, but for the average student, the minimum hours (and the time and money they represent) are the only critical difference.

I mention time and money... but believe me, a 141 school can get plenty of money out of you without making you fly more. They usually have higher overhead, which means higher rates for everything.


Why the minimum hours are what they are, I don't know, exactly. Maybe because a Part 61 curriculum could be very informal, with only one instructor involved, the FAA thinks it unwise to place as much trust in that as a more "business-like" school.

But as was pointed out earlier, when you present yourself for any check ride, how many hours you have or what you did during those hours means absolutely nothing. You will have to demonstrate competence to the examiner's satisfaction. So whatever training path you take, use your time- and money- wisely! In the end, it's not the promises of a big fancy school or the reputation of the old friend-of-the-family CFI who teaches you in his airplane for free... it's you, and what you have learned.

I doubt any commercial operator, whether it's a banner-towing company or an airline, is going to care much about those 5 hours for the PP or the 60 for the commercial. they will hire or not hire you- the pilot.

« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2009 at 1:31pm by beaky »  

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 10th, 2009 at 10:59pm

Splinter562   Offline
Colonel
Tampa, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 217
*****
 
Well said.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Nov 11th, 2009 at 7:02pm

Jersey Flyer   Offline
Colonel
New Jerseys where its
at.
Newark, New jersey

Gender: male
Posts: 212
*****
 
You made some interesting points Rottydaddy. Regaurdless of my training, I feel more comfortable with learning what I need to know under a part 141, only because I'm only a flight sim guy and couldn't tell you a darn thing about real aviation. Maybe down the road once I acquire my private, and begin to go for my instrument and commercial ratings, that is when I can shoot for Part 61 because it would require less hours hence more money in my pocket (a whole 5%).
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Nov 11th, 2009 at 8:33pm

flaminghotsauce   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 181
*****
 
Just to chime in here.
I went through 141 school and college at the same facility. Our check rides were usually abbreviated and very informal according to our chief flight instructor. Most every student to take a check ride showed up well prepared and I never heard of anyone failing a check ride.

The same check instructor gave Part 61 students a royal full metal jacket working over, as they were not as prepared. I'm not saying this as bragging, it's just the situation the check ride examiner found. He was wasting his time being thorough with 141's so he'd just ask pertinent things and give us sudden "ATC" type directions in the airplane.

141 schools should be fairly uniform in their instruction whereas 61's might be looser, I don't know.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:40pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
Jersey Flyer wrote on Nov 11th, 2009 at 7:02pm:
You made some interesting points Rottydaddy. Regaurdless of my training, I feel more comfortable with learning what I need to know under a part 141, only because I'm only a flight sim guy and couldn't tell you a darn thing about real aviation. Maybe down the road once I acquire my private, and begin to go for my instrument and commercial ratings, that is when I can shoot for Part 61 because it would require less hours hence more money in my pocket (a whole 5%).


I think there is some confusion here, due to a simple error in rotty's post.  The commercial rating requires 250 hours for 61 students, and 90 for 141 students.  Now regardless of which, you can do them both without any prior knowledge.  Lots of people show up at the airport not knowing the first thing about airplanes and get their license through Part 61 training.  And as for the minimum flight times, very few actually take a checkride at the bare minimum of time.  The average flight time for a private pilot is usually closer to 60 hours.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:45pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
flaminghotsauce wrote on Nov 11th, 2009 at 8:33pm:
Just to chime in here.
I went through 141 school and college at the same facility. Our check rides were usually abbreviated and very informal according to our chief flight instructor. Most every student to take a check ride showed up well prepared and I never heard of anyone failing a check ride.

The same check instructor gave Part 61 students a royal full metal jacket working over, as they were not as prepared. I'm not saying this as bragging, it's just the situation the check ride examiner found. He was wasting his time being thorough with 141's so he'd just ask pertinent things and give us sudden "ATC" type directions in the airplane.

141 schools should be fairly uniform in their instruction whereas 61's might be looser, I don't know.


Examiners vary.  I finished my PPL through my college (141).  We had a couple of examiners in the area that did our test.  One was pretty easy going and just wanted to make sure you could fly safe and legal, and the other firmly believed in the fail ratio.  Needless to say which one I got stuck with for my exam.  I received a pink slip for "turns around a point", but still completed the check ride.  My instructor basically said that is his way of maintaining his fail ratio without making it too hard on the student.  All I had to do was log another flight with my instructor, which we did that same day, then another .4 in the logbook with the examiner the next day.

From what I'm told, the FAA expects the examiners to have a certain fail ratio.  They don't want to see an examiner giving every student a pass.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:12pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
DaveSims wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:40pm:
I think there is some confusion here, due to a simple error in rotty's post.  The commercial rating requires 250 hours for 61 students, and 90 for 141 students. 

It's 190 (total time)... can't seem to find the exact "chapter and verse" in the FARs... which is odd; Part 141 is more about the schools, whereas 61 is specifically about pilot certificate requirements. Never did enjoy reading the FARS...  Grin

   But I have heard this from more than one person who "should know"; I am confident it is 190, not 90.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:24pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
DaveSims wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:45pm:
flaminghotsauce wrote on Nov 11th, 2009 at 8:33pm:
Just to chime in here.
I went through 141 school and college at the same facility. Our check rides were usually abbreviated and very informal according to our chief flight instructor. Most every student to take a check ride showed up well prepared and I never heard of anyone failing a check ride.

The same check instructor gave Part 61 students a royal full metal jacket working over, as they were not as prepared. I'm not saying this as bragging, it's just the situation the check ride examiner found. He was wasting his time being thorough with 141's so he'd just ask pertinent things and give us sudden "ATC" type directions in the airplane.

141 schools should be fairly uniform in their instruction whereas 61's might be looser, I don't know.


Examiners vary.  I finished my PPL through my college (141).  We had a couple of examiners in the area that did our test.  One was pretty easy going and just wanted to make sure you could fly safe and legal, and the other firmly believed in the fail ratio.  Needless to say which one I got stuck with for my exam.  I received a pink slip for "turns around a point", but still completed the check ride.  My instructor basically said that is his way of maintaining his fail ratio without making it too hard on the student.  All I had to do was log another flight with my instructor, which we did that same day, then another .4 in the logbook with the examiner the next day.

From what I'm told, the FAA expects the examiners to have a certain fail ratio.  They don't want to see an examiner giving every student a pass.

That's bizarre, and I don't see it anywhere in Part 141 of the FARs.  I understand how it "wouldn't look good if nobody failed", but I understand even more how a flight school, especially one which has in-house examiners (allowed under 141), can make more money by requiring re-testing (in addition to the extra rental and instructor time, you no doubt paid the examiner's fee again, yes?). 

I don't see why the FAA should be alarmed if all applicants pass within a given period... maybe the school and the students are doing a good job!
  It's like assuming a police force is lazy or corrupt because they're not issuing summonses in a given period. Maybe the citizens are actually obeying the laws! You don't see cops out there issuing, say, traffic summonses to meet some sort of quota... oh wait, nevermind.  Roll Eyes

 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 13th, 2009 at 8:49am

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
beaky wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:12pm:
DaveSims wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:40pm:
I think there is some confusion here, due to a simple error in rotty's post.  The commercial rating requires 250 hours for 61 students, and 90 for 141 students. 

It's 190 (total time)... can't seem to find the exact "chapter and verse" in the FARs... which is odd; Part 141 is more about the schools, whereas 61 is specifically about pilot certificate requirements. Never did enjoy reading the FARS...  Grin

   But I have heard this from more than one person who "should know"; I am confident it is 190, not 90.


And now I am posting errors, I meant 190.  In your earlier post you had transposed the hours for 61 and 141.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 13th, 2009 at 8:52am

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
beaky wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:24pm:
DaveSims wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:45pm:
flaminghotsauce wrote on Nov 11th, 2009 at 8:33pm:
Just to chime in here.
I went through 141 school and college at the same facility. Our check rides were usually abbreviated and very informal according to our chief flight instructor. Most every student to take a check ride showed up well prepared and I never heard of anyone failing a check ride.

The same check instructor gave Part 61 students a royal full metal jacket working over, as they were not as prepared. I'm not saying this as bragging, it's just the situation the check ride examiner found. He was wasting his time being thorough with 141's so he'd just ask pertinent things and give us sudden "ATC" type directions in the airplane.

141 schools should be fairly uniform in their instruction whereas 61's might be looser, I don't know.


Examiners vary.  I finished my PPL through my college (141).  We had a couple of examiners in the area that did our test.  One was pretty easy going and just wanted to make sure you could fly safe and legal, and the other firmly believed in the fail ratio.  Needless to say which one I got stuck with for my exam.  I received a pink slip for "turns around a point", but still completed the check ride.  My instructor basically said that is his way of maintaining his fail ratio without making it too hard on the student.  All I had to do was log another flight with my instructor, which we did that same day, then another .4 in the logbook with the examiner the next day.

From what I'm told, the FAA expects the examiners to have a certain fail ratio.  They don't want to see an examiner giving every student a pass.

That's bizarre, and I don't see it anywhere in Part 141 of the FARs.  I understand how it "wouldn't look good if nobody failed", but I understand even more how a flight school, especially one which has in-house examiners (allowed under 141), can make more money by requiring re-testing (in addition to the extra rental and instructor time, you no doubt paid the examiner's fee again, yes?). 

I don't see why the FAA should be alarmed if all applicants pass within a given period... maybe the school and the students are doing a good job!
  It's like assuming a police force is lazy or corrupt because they're not issuing summonses in a given period. Maybe the citizens are actually obeying the laws! You don't see cops out there issuing, say, traffic summonses to meet some sort of quota... oh wait, nevermind.  Roll Eyes



I would believe it is not one of those written rules, but I believe a 10% fail ratio is what is "expected", kind of like quotas for police departments.  They don't officially exist, but everyone knows what they are.  My school did not hire examiners, we had two outside ones that were available.  Because we completed the entire test, the examiner did not charge me for our short hop the next day, one more thing that leads me to believe it was just to protect his ratio.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Nov 13th, 2009 at 7:40pm

Flying Trucker   Offline
Colonel
An Old Retired Rocking
Chair Flying Geezer

Gender: male
Posts: 11425
*****
 
Good evening folks... Smiley

I am not familiar with a lot of what you talking about as I am a Canadian and we have our own Air Regs and Air Nav Orders etc.
But I am a little curious on a couple of things and I hope I don't stray you too far off topic.

An ab-intio student, would they receive a tax break on their income tax if they  go through a Certified Flying School versus an ab-intio student who does not.

When a person who applies for pilot training and I am talking about someone who is steadily employed, when they pass all their tests, can they claim their training as lets say educational and get money back on their income tax.

Would a company who wishes to purchase an aircraft and have one of their employees trained to commercial standards, would both parties benefit with tax breaks.

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
 

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Nov 13th, 2009 at 10:22pm

DaveSims   Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa

Gender: male
Posts: 2453
*****
 
Flying Trucker wrote on Nov 13th, 2009 at 7:40pm:
Good evening folks... Smiley

I am not familiar with a lot of what you talking about as I am a Canadian and we have our own Air Regs and Air Nav Orders etc.
But I am a little curious on a couple of things and I hope I don't stray you too far off topic.

An ab-intio student, would they receive a tax break on their income tax if they  go through a Certified Flying School versus an ab-intio student who does not.

When a person who applies for pilot training and I am talking about someone who is steadily employed, when they pass all their tests, can they claim their training as lets say educational and get money back on their income tax.

Would a company who wishes to purchase an aircraft and have one of their employees trained to commercial standards, would both parties benefit with tax breaks.

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug


Now its getting trickier.  Not being a "tax professional", either in the US or Canada, I wouldn't dare guess on this one.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Nov 14th, 2009 at 6:53pm

flaminghotsauce   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 181
*****
 
190 hours is accurate for 141 schools, 250 for part 61. Unless it's changed in recent years. I'm in bad need of a new FAR/AIM manual.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Nov 15th, 2009 at 1:31pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
DaveSims wrote on Nov 13th, 2009 at 8:49am:
beaky wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:12pm:
DaveSims wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 4:40pm:
I think there is some confusion here, due to a simple error in rotty's post.  The commercial rating requires 250 hours for 61 students, and 90 for 141 students. 

It's 190 (total time)... can't seem to find the exact "chapter and verse" in the FARs... which is odd; Part 141 is more about the schools, whereas 61 is specifically about pilot certificate requirements. Never did enjoy reading the FARS...  Grin

   But I have heard this from more than one person who "should know"; I am confident it is 190, not 90.


And now I am posting errors, I meant 190.  In your earlier post you had transposed the hours for 61 and 141. 


Duh... fixed that; thanks.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print