Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Seeking opinions about Captain Sim aircraft addons (Read 1574 times)
Nov 4th, 2009 at 11:01am

Tech Diver   Offline
Colonel
Concord, Massachusetts

Gender: male
Posts: 196
*****
 
I'm looking to add on some really well done aircraft to FSX and came across the products from Captain Sim. I'm considering getting the Boeing 767 (and possibly the 727), but I would like to hear some opinions before I puchase any of these. How realistic is the flight model? The web site photos look great, but what do you owners think? Does all the detailed geometric modeling cause any performance issues?

Peter
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Nov 4th, 2009 at 11:21am

Dave W   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 19
*****
 
You need to know that their B727 does NOT have a 2D cockpit.  They don't make it very clear at their site.  I was happy with it at the price I paid but I had to build my own Cockpit.
 

Flight Simulator Deluxe - SP1 - SP2
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Nov 4th, 2009 at 11:31am

Tech Diver   Offline
Colonel
Concord, Massachusetts

Gender: male
Posts: 196
*****
 
No problem, I only fly with 3D cockpits. Other than that, how do you like it?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Nov 4th, 2009 at 11:58am
StormtrooperSHQ   Ex Member

 
Their XLOAD F/A-18 is pretty cool too.  Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Nov 4th, 2009 at 8:10pm

idahosurge   Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Anna, Texas, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 687
*****
 
Quote:
Their XLOAD F/A-18 is pretty cool too.  Smiley



Be advised that you need Acceleration before the XLOAD F/A-18D will work

Rod
 

Asus R3E_i7 980X @ 4.44GHz_TR Silver Arrow_Mushkin Redline 6GB 1,644MHz @ 6-7-6-18_Zotac AMP GTX 480_OS - Windows 7 Ult 64b_OS SSD - Crucial C300 128GB_FSX HD - WD VR 600GB*2 w/3ware 9750-4i 6Gb/s Controller_Corsair AX850_CM HAF-X_FSX Gold, UTX, GEX, FSG, ST, MSX, MSE, FTX, FEX, FSWC, MTX, STB, AS F16, PMDG MD11, CS MD80 Pro, FSD P38, VRS FA18E
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Nov 5th, 2009 at 3:23am
Crash   Ex Member

 
I've once made the mistake to purchase their 757 for FS9. Talk about a resource hog. Flying it turned FS9 into a slideshow...

Crash Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 5th, 2009 at 6:44am

JeeS   Offline
Colonel
FSX - the best!

Gender: male
Posts: 158
*****
 
I own almost all CS products and must say they are great! You won't regret if purchase them.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Nov 5th, 2009 at 5:35pm

Rich H   Offline
Colonel
Sweden Jamboree 2011!
Solihull, U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 2082
*****
 
Tech Diver wrote on Nov 4th, 2009 at 11:01am:
I'm looking to add on some really well done aircraft to FSX and came across the products from Captain Sim. I'm considering getting the Boeing 767 (and possibly the 727), but I would like to hear some opinions before I puchase any of these. How realistic is the flight model? The web site photos look great, but what do you owners think? Does all the detailed geometric modeling cause any performance issues?

Peter

The 767 is good, bit frame unfriendly  Undecided Can't say for the 727 though, the exterior is very detailed and frame friendly, overall I hear good opinions, and not many people complaining about the frames.
All the rest I fine run fine  Wink
 

...

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Nov 5th, 2009 at 10:34pm

Tech Diver   Offline
Colonel
Concord, Massachusetts

Gender: male
Posts: 196
*****
 
Thanks for the feedback so far. Can the "frame unfriendly" models be tuned to use less compute cycles or are you stuck with what they give you? I'm particularly interested in the 767 for its realism, but if it will significantly drop my frame rate it defeats the purpose.

Peter
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Nov 5th, 2009 at 11:07pm
SeanTK   Ex Member

 
I've generally found their aircraft to be enjoyable, but keep in mind that many users in various FS communities across the web have reported severe deficiencies in Captain Sim's customer service principles and attitudes.
I used to get a lot of use out of their excellent 757 for FS2004, and as long as you keep in mind the potential for customer service issues, I would recommend their aircraft.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Nov 6th, 2009 at 12:42am

SubZer0   Offline
Colonel
KLNA

Gender: male
Posts: 3882
*****
 
When I first bought their 757 for FSX, it was filled with bugs and ran terrible. Now, after the 4.3 patch, it runs perfectly smooth and has few bugs, if any. The quality and detail in all their products is amazing!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Nov 6th, 2009 at 10:33am

Jeff.Guo   Offline
Colonel
Hello!

Posts: 283
*****
 
Quote:
I've generally found their aircraft to be enjoyable, but keep in mind that many users in various FS communities across the web have reported severe deficiencies in Captain Sim's customer service principles and attitudes.


I can personally attest to that. I could be that Russian doesn't have a "friendly" tone, so their true intentions don't translate...

...but its more likely they just got the business end of a NKVD baton still stuck up their ass.

Their products are good, but not worth the 50 or so Euros that they demand. Wait until Christmas, they like to do their 9.99 store-wide sale once a year, and load up then.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 6th, 2009 at 10:44am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
I love Captain Sim stuff, great quality at a great price Cool
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 6th, 2009 at 10:50am

Tech Diver   Offline
Colonel
Concord, Massachusetts

Gender: male
Posts: 196
*****
 
Jeff, thanks for the great advice about the Christmas sale. I will wait until then and "load up". Also, thanks to everyone else for your feedback. I am definitely convinced to get their products.

Peter
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 6th, 2009 at 1:40pm

Rich H   Offline
Colonel
Sweden Jamboree 2011!
Solihull, U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 2082
*****
 
Tech Diver wrote on Nov 6th, 2009 at 10:50am:
Jeff, thanks for the great advice about the Christmas sale. I will wait until then and "load up". Also, thanks to everyone else for your feedback. I am definitely convinced to get their products.

Peter

We don't know Captain Sim will have a sale for definite though.
 

...

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Nov 9th, 2009 at 10:14am

JeeS   Offline
Colonel
FSX - the best!

Gender: male
Posts: 158
*****
 
Peter, in the 767  you may disable passenger cabin, this will improve FPS.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Nov 10th, 2009 at 5:42pm

snippyfsxer   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 404
*****
 
I think the cs 727 is, by design, more of a "lite" product.  The version I have which was 2.1, didn't have the important performance charts or accurate EPR modelling.  For instance you can't set climb thrust, because the epr falls off precipitously after takeoff and is always far below what you would you would set it at.  That is moot though, because the plane doesn't have an OAT guage.  The same issue affects the descent.  Unless you are applying a substantial amount of power (far above idle), your 280kt descent will produce a hell-dive around 8000fpm.  These things ruin the plane for my tastes, but if you are more into the interior visuals, the plane is second to none.  It is fun to land.
Since I haven't upgraded my 727 in a while, does anyone know if the aforementioned issues are addressed?  I hope they are because I love the old vintage planes!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:57am

Dave W   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 19
*****
 
Fsxer,

   Like I said above, I had to build my own 2D cockpit so that meant a lot of flight testing.  I also made a flight from Bangor, Maine to Reykjavik.  I've never flow a B727 in R/L but I had zero problems with the flight model.  I did a power off desent into Iceland from 30K with no problems at all.   

One man's opinion...
 

Flight Simulator Deluxe - SP1 - SP2
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 7:22pm

snippyfsxer   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 404
*****
 
Dave W wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 11:57am:
Fsxer,

   Like I said above, I had to build my own 2D cockpit so that meant a lot of flight testing.  I also made a flight from Bangor, Maine to Reykjavik.  I've never flow a B727 in R/L but I had zero problems with the flight model.  I did a power off desent into Iceland from 30K with no problems at all.   

One man's opinion...


I think it is very possible that there were some FDE and documentation revisions in subsequent updates since the version I had (2.1) came out 6 months ago.  I uninstalled and never upgraded because the list of bug fixes never mentioned some of my concerns.  The closest I ever got to the cockpit of a 727 was talking about gladiators with the pilot at age 5, so my assesment of whether these planes fly like the real thing is based on the numbers in the performance charts, which some software developers provide (like Dreamfleet), and some don't.  When you say that you had no "problems", I look at it more from the standpoint of whether the plane flew by the numbers or not.  I'm going from the climb EPR and descent tables provided from the Dreamfleet product, since the cs didn't come with these.  Can you tell me what version you are using and if these tables have been provided?  Did you not notice a problem setting the climb thrust right after takeoff?  How did you know what the Max Climb EPR was, for a given temperature as you climbed, or what your expected fuel burn should be during economy cruise? I really want to know because I would love to have a "realistic" 727 in my hanger and would be very interested in re-installing the cs727 if the answer to those things is yes.  If not, that is fine too, there is no reason the poster couldn't enjoy this plane for its own merits.  All I'm saying is that I personally didn't like if for those reasons mentioned
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 8:26pm

BSW727   Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to SimV.
Inside a Boeing 727

Gender: male
Posts: 202
*****
 
If you want more than eye candy, try the Dreamfleet. It's miles above the CS, and it books out on the numbers accoording to my US Air manual using -15 engines.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 9:08pm

snippyfsxer   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 404
*****
 
BSW727 wrote on Nov 12th, 2009 at 8:26pm:
If you want more than eye candy, try the Dreamfleet. It's miles above the CS, and it books out on the numbers accoording to my US Air manual using -15 engines.


A bit of a personal vignette that may be off the topic of this Captain Sim thread, but I have to say that the Dreamfleet 727 along with the RFP 742 were the two planes that provided me with so much feeling of "virtual accomplishment" that I went out and spent mucho dinero to get fully into the hobby, with yoke, rudders, throttles, corei7 and all.  Now I'm waiting for those two airplanes to be updated for FSX.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Nov 12th, 2009 at 9:59pm

Dave W   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 19
*****
 
Fsxer,

The install file I have is CSP721_2200.exe and the PFD files are dated 6/4/09.   If you're asking does the B727 I have fly to Boeing specs.  Well... who knows.  I sure don't.   The model I have descends at any rate I want and at any reasonable speed.   It will T/O and climb at 4000 fpm up to 8000 feet and fuel flow is related to throttle setting.  As far as OAT... well at 30,000 feet it's COLD.    Beyond that I can't help you.  Best of luck in your quest for the ideal B727.
 

Flight Simulator Deluxe - SP1 - SP2
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print