Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
General
›
Music, Arts & Entertainment
› This is stupid...
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
This is stupid... (Read 468 times)
Sep 18
th
, 2009 at 11:34pm
SeanTK
Ex Member
Warning, link contains some language.
http://gizmodo.com/5361697/music-industry-wants-royalties-from-itunes-30-second-...
Basically, a couple of royalties groups want to charge online music services for the sample 30 second clips that they play. If they have their way, then predictably a consumer would probably have to pay a few extra cents just to hear a
sample
of a song that they are interested in getting. I understand that they wish to make sure that all artists get "monetary recognition" for their works, but this has gone a little too far in my opinion.
Disclaimer:
Yes, I legally purchase music and I am not trying to bash the concept of artists receiving royalties in general, that's how they continue to make great tunes.
I just think that charging for a
sample
of a song is a little too ambitious.
Thoughts?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Sep 19
th
, 2009 at 12:27am
skoker
Offline
Colonel
Jordan never wore his
safety goggles...
1G3
Gender:
Posts: 4611
Why the hell would you pay for a sample?!? If your gonna pay for a sample then just buy the dang song!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Sep 19
th
, 2009 at 9:07am
ApplePie
Offline
Colonel
North Carolina, USA
Gender:
Posts: 2143
Aren't samples supposed to make you want to buy the
song
?
MY SPECS= 5' 11" Slightly less than healthy male, 160 lbs., Brown eyes........Oh...you were wondering about my
computers
specs.....
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Sep 19
th
, 2009 at 9:43pm
SeanTK
Ex Member
Here is the much more in depth cnet article if you want both sides to the story:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10355448-93.html
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Sep 20
th
, 2009 at 2:19pm
machineman9
Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England
Gender:
Posts: 5255
ApplePie wrote
on Sep 19
th
, 2009 at 9:07am:
Aren't samples supposed to make you want to buy the
song
?
Yes. So include charge for those songs and you are either going to:
1) Ignore the song and the producers because of their stupid preview costs
2) Download the song illegally
3) Preview the song elsewhere for free (Such as youtube, but this ties in with point 2)
It is really quite stupid. You wouldn't pay to test drive your car before buying it... It is the incentive to get you to buy it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Sep 20
th
, 2009 at 2:59pm
Steve M
Offline
Colonel
Cambridge On.
Gender:
Posts: 4097
machineman9 wrote
on Sep 20
th
, 2009 at 2:19pm:
ApplePie wrote
on Sep 19
th
, 2009 at 9:07am:
Aren't samples supposed to make you want to buy the
song
?
Yes. So include charge for those songs and you are either going to:
1) Ignore the song and the producers because of their stupid preview costs
2) Download the song illegally
3) Preview the song elsewhere for free (Such as youtube, but this ties in with point 2)
It is really quite stupid. You wouldn't pay to test drive your car before buying it... It is the incentive to get you to buy it.
Pretty silly idea. Most hit songs, that you may want to purchace, are usually played on the radio which can be played using your PC for free. From there you could just save the music for personal use using the right software.
By making it tough on the consumer, they are just screwing themselves and pushing more people to run to the other options. No matter what they do to protect thier interests, someone, somewhere, will come up with ways to skirt the legal proccess.
Flying with twins is a lot of fun..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Sep 20
th
, 2009 at 4:11pm
machineman9
Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England
Gender:
Posts: 5255
Yep exactly. They can't protect themselves from every method people can use to get their music, so they may as well make it easy on themselves and give us the music as simply as possible so that we are likely to buy it.
In the modern world, it takes one person in the world to buy a song for everyone else to be able to use it. If you bring in more barriers to getting the music, more people are going to file share and get the songs for free. Which is a worse loss? £0.79 per song lost because they got it for free elsewhere, or losing out £0.05 because they don't want to buy the sample?
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment ««
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.