Simviation Forum - Trafic question.

Apr 2^nd, 2009 at 12:46pm

757200ba Offline
Colonel
757200-THOR of the skys
Florida

Gender:
Posts: 516

Hi!.
I don't know if this was already posted or not.
We all like to have real traffic on our sim and there are lots of providers for that.
I have 2 questions
1 Do you think its worth it to remove the default commercial traffic so we can put AI traffic and the work load on the pc should be less because without the default traffic the AI traffic, can be easily handled?
2 In terms of fps witch of the AI traffic providers is best?
Many thanks

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Apr 2^nd, 2009 at 9:02pm

Kevin Jarvis Offline
Colonel
Morgan Co Illinois, USA, Earth

Gender:
Posts: 292

1. Yes. I've removed the default traffic to add realism and it also cuts down on the number of AI the engine must read.
2. I use WorldofAI and Military AI models. They seem to be the most resource efficient models available...IMHO.

I fly

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Apr 4^th, 2009 at 12:32am

-Crossfire- Offline
Colonel
Northern Canada

Gender:
Posts: 954

1. I have removed the default AI, but I wish I could keep the default GA, the smaller airports are pretty dead without it.

2. World of AI and Military AI Works, the best AI out there. Little to no FPS hit on my machine.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Apr 4^th, 2009 at 9:25am

dave3cu Offline
Colonel
Procrastinate now, don't
put it off.
3CU, Northern Wisconsin, USA

Gender:
Posts: 3077

Crossfire,

http://www.flightsim2004-fanatics.com/uploads/DefaultGA/Def_GA_DL.htm-FSX (and fs2004) source files (TTools .txt) and traffic .bgls to install your default ga traffic. The .bgls were compiled with TTools, so if you have converted your WoAI and MAI files to FSX format you'll have to convert these also.

Dave

At that time [1909] the chief engineer was almost always the chief test pilot as well. That had the fortunate result of eliminating poor engineering early in aviation. Igor Sikorsky

I intend to live forever....so far, so good. Steven Wright

You know....you can just rip up a to-do list.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Apr 4^th, 2009 at 2:24pm

Sean_TK Offline
Colonel
Hello
USA

Gender:
Posts: 1620

Yes, remove the default.
I use WOAI, a few MAIW, along with HTAI Cessnas traffic, and compiled plans using the "GA-Traffic" program. (The GA-traffic program will fill out your smaller airfields around the globe)

I also have a handful of compiled plans for airlines and units that those don't cover, such as some of the newer stuff flying around Hawaii, and some minor regional airlines. It can really make your skies busy at times.
Once you get a lot loaded in, try flying from Washington DC, to Philadelpha, and then to one of the airports in New York City.

The entire flight should be absolutely saturated with traffic!

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Apr 7^th, 2009 at 3:40am

-Crossfire- Offline
Colonel
Northern Canada

Gender:
Posts: 954

dave3cu wrote on Apr 4^th, 2009 at 9:25am:

Crossfire,

http://www.flightsim2004-fanatics.com/uploads/DefaultGA/Def_GA_DL.htm-FSX (and fs2004) source files (TTools .txt) and traffic .bgls to install your default ga traffic. The .bgls were compiled with TTools, so if you have converted your WoAI and MAI files to FSX format you'll have to convert these also.

Dave

Thanks Dave! Ive been looking for this forever!

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: