Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
›
Tweaking & Overclocking
› OCCT for i7?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
OCCT for i7? (Read 1830 times)
Jan 12
th
, 2009 at 8:53pm
jwenham
Offline
Colonel
Clear to Land... Are you
sure?
Posts: 266
I am getting ready to play around with OC my new i7 940 and see alot of people use OCCT to test the OC. I downloaded and ran it to see what it was all about and noticed that only 3 of the 4 cores show in the GUI. Real Temp 2.90 shows all 4 and all 4 a chugging along viewing them in the task manager. Am I doing something wrong or is it not 100% compatible for i7 yet?
Intel i7 940 2.93 clocked to 4.0ghz Asus P6T Deluxe 6gb OCZ 1600 8-8-8-24 EVGA GTX 260 Superclocked Edition Thermalright 120 CPU Cooler Power PC & Cooling 750w PSU 1 tb Seagate Barracuda HD 500 gb Seagate Barracude HD 22" Viewsonic Widescreen Track IR 4 XP Pro x64
www.fairtax.org
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jan 12
th
, 2009 at 11:03pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
Its still not i7 ready
They are working on a new version for i7
Use prime for the time being and I will see what the status is on other stress test software
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jan 12
th
, 2009 at 11:08pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
Here
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?s=549f93e4487cfeec87e04428c40f5...
That is the maker of OCCT and he has a temp beta out that deals with the issue... that should work for you
be sure to uninstall 2.0.1
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jan 12
th
, 2009 at 11:35pm
jwenham
Offline
Colonel
Clear to Land... Are you
sure?
Posts: 266
NickN wrote
on Jan 12
th
, 2009 at 11:08pm:
Here
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?s=549f93e4487cfeec87e04428c40f5...
That is the maker of OCCT and he has a temp beta out that deals with the issue... that should work for you
be sure to uninstall 2.0.1
Yep, that works! what test should I run and for how long?
Intel i7 940 2.93 clocked to 4.0ghz Asus P6T Deluxe 6gb OCZ 1600 8-8-8-24 EVGA GTX 260 Superclocked Edition Thermalright 120 CPU Cooler Power PC & Cooling 750w PSU 1 tb Seagate Barracuda HD 500 gb Seagate Barracude HD 22" Viewsonic Widescreen Track IR 4 XP Pro x64
www.fairtax.org
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jan 13
th
, 2009 at 12:34am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
the CPU OCCT 1 hour automatic test is fine
do not mess with any other test in the list.,.. its a beta program and those are new.. just the first option CPU: OCCT
In the OPTIONS click the yellow settings icon and see if the temp is set to 80c.. if it is you are ready
Click the ON button... a 1 minute pause will occur then the stress test will begin
It will crash and halt the test if there is
A: Instability
B. You hit 80c
you have to check the GRAPHS (should be in the OCCT folder in your Documents) if you crash and not sitting right there to see what the temp was when it crashed.. if it was not 80c then it was instability that caused the crash.. that would indicate Vcore most likely
If it hits 80c but was stable you either have Vcore too high or your cooling is not sufficient for the speed/vcore you are trying to run, one of the two
If cooling is not sufficient, lowering vcore is the only thing you can do and if that is unstable then you must drop BCLOCK/ or CPU speed till its stable with a lower Vcore
understand?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 8:43pm
jwenham
Offline
Colonel
Clear to Land... Are you
sure?
Posts: 266
Well after many many tries to get to 4ghz on my 940 I finally found the missing key. I could get to 3.8 very very easy leaving everything at auto except for the vcore voltage. Then I went for the gusto and was able to get to 4.2 to post and boot into windows. Ran occt and it overheated in 2 min of testing. Then I decided to try for an evn 4ghz also with no luck untill I made the following changes.
VCORE - 1.35
CPU Mult - 21
BCLK - 193
and this one was the one I feel that made the difference QPI voltage changed to 1.31
Cant hit 4ghz with a 22x mult but 21 worked great. My temps didnt go above 73 c which I thought was pretty good. I still need to optimize the vcore. The 4.2 has got my interest and I think it is possible but will run like this for a while and see how it goes. Ran your tune flight senario and can more or less maintain 30 fps with Very Dense autogen and max scenery detail and 6% cars and 59 AI (ultimate traffic) with low ground vehicles at airport. Very very very happy with that! Came from a Pentium D 805 so hense my excitement. Do you see anything I can try to help go higher or am I maxed out.
Intel i7 940 2.93 clocked to 4.0ghz Asus P6T Deluxe 6gb OCZ 1600 8-8-8-24 EVGA GTX 260 Superclocked Edition Thermalright 120 CPU Cooler Power PC & Cooling 750w PSU 1 tb Seagate Barracuda HD 500 gb Seagate Barracude HD 22" Viewsonic Widescreen Track IR 4 XP Pro x64
www.fairtax.org
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:31pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
OK so you are at 193 x21 = 4053MHz and under 80c tested?
Leave it
You want higher you need better cooling
You are actually lucky to get the 920 stable and under 80c @ 4GHz
QPI/DRAM .. do not exceed 1.38v unless you talk to me first
1.35-.137 is fine
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:33pm
jwenham
Offline
Colonel
Clear to Land... Are you
sure?
Posts: 266
NickN wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:31pm:
OK so you are at 193 x21 = 4053MHz and under 80c tested?
Leave it
You want higher you need better cooling
You are actually lucky to get the 920 stable and under 80c @ 4GHz
940 Nick
Intel i7 940 2.93 clocked to 4.0ghz Asus P6T Deluxe 6gb OCZ 1600 8-8-8-24 EVGA GTX 260 Superclocked Edition Thermalright 120 CPU Cooler Power PC & Cooling 750w PSU 1 tb Seagate Barracuda HD 500 gb Seagate Barracude HD 22" Viewsonic Widescreen Track IR 4 XP Pro x64
www.fairtax.org
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:38pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
opppsss LOL
I have 4 i7 coversations on my screen right now.. you are # 2
sorry
OK.. same deal, leave it.. you still need special cooling to go any further but it is possible, much easier than a 920 but it is pushing things.
QPI/DRAM limits are the same though and yes, the higher the clock the higher QPI/DRAM must go
Congrats on 4Ghz!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:42pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
The only thing you could try doing to go higher with the current heatsink is lap both the processor and the heatsink to a flat shine finish down to the copper... its not an easy job if you have never done it before but it usually nets another 5-10c on temps
It voids the warranty on the processor and HS of course and there are risks
I think you should take 4GHz and enjoy it
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:57pm
jwenham
Offline
Colonel
Clear to Land... Are you
sure?
Posts: 266
NickN wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:42pm:
The only thing you could try doing to go higher with the current heatsink is lap both the processor and the heatsink to a flat shine finish down to the copper... its not an easy job if you have never done it before but it usually nets another 5-10c on temps
It voids the warranty on the processor and HS of course and there are risks
I think you shooud take 4GHz and enjoy it
Agreed! One main thing I have noticed with this system is that when I make a setting change in FSX I can really see the benefit or the neg side of the change real easy. On my old system it was so taxed that I couldnt tell if the changes really made a diff. I get the best smoothness with it locked at 30 and it has never fallen below 18 even at KLAX! I also found that my VC wants a lower bufferpool even though I have 896 mb of ram on it. When I had it set to 70000000 I got bad spikes on the screen and bad performance. Changed it to 30000000 and all is well and havent seen the spikes since. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I have the Superclocked version of the 260. I read on EVGA site that some people are actually downclocking them to fix it but the lower bufferpool fixed it for me. Thanks for all your help, I used alot of your suggestions if not all of them and it has paid off 10 fold! See you in the skys ... Europe soon?
Intel i7 940 2.93 clocked to 4.0ghz Asus P6T Deluxe 6gb OCZ 1600 8-8-8-24 EVGA GTX 260 Superclocked Edition Thermalright 120 CPU Cooler Power PC & Cooling 750w PSU 1 tb Seagate Barracuda HD 500 gb Seagate Barracude HD 22" Viewsonic Widescreen Track IR 4 XP Pro x64
www.fairtax.org
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 11:21pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
jwenham wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:57pm:
NickN wrote
on Jan 14
th
, 2009 at 10:42pm:
The only thing you could try doing to go higher with the current heatsink is lap both the processor and the heatsink to a flat shine finish down to the copper... its not an easy job if you have never done it before but it usually nets another 5-10c on temps
It voids the warranty on the processor and HS of course and there are risks
I think you shooud take 4GHz and enjoy it
Agreed! One main thing I have noticed with this system is that when I make a setting change in FSX I can really see the benefit or the neg side of the change real easy. On my old system it was so taxed that I couldnt tell if the changes really made a diff. I get the best smoothness with it locked at 30 and it has never fallen below 18 even at KLAX! I also found that my VC wants a lower bufferpool even though I have 896 mb of ram on it. When I had it set to 70000000 I got bad spikes on the screen and bad performance. Changed it to 30000000 and all is well and havent seen the spikes since. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I have the Superclocked version of the 260. I read on EVGA site that some people are actually downclocking them to fix it but the lower bufferpool fixed it for me. Thanks for all your help, I used alot of your suggestions if not all of them and it has paid off 10 fold! See you in the skys ... Europe soon?
we are hoping within 90 days on Europe
And yes, bufferpools is tricky.. you must work the value. Sometimes it is best to just completely remove it from the config, others you can see the difference flying over large amounts of autogen trees and building
Have fun.. I am glad you went this route.. you have a lot of time now with that system and the ability to upgrade again too
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jan 18
th
, 2009 at 3:15am
Vodka Burner
Ex Member
What about this
Intel burn test
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=197835
it gets my Q6600 a full 6 degrees hotter than an hour of OCCT, and that's only after 3 minutes of use.
EDIT:
crashed about 10 minutes, on an OCCT auto 'stable' system.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jan 18
th
, 2009 at 1:44pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
Quote:
What about this
Intel burn test
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=197835
it gets my Q6600 a full 6 degrees hotter than an hour of OCCT, and that's only after 3 minutes of use.
EDIT:
crashed about 10 minutes, on an OCCT auto 'stable' system.
what would be the purpose?
MSFS and other apps will never, ever heat up a system hotter than OCCT
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jan 19
th
, 2009 at 1:07am
Vodka Burner
Ex Member
NickN wrote
on Jan 18
th
, 2009 at 1:44pm:
Quote:
What about this
Intel burn test
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=197835
it gets my Q6600 a full 6 degrees hotter than an hour of OCCT, and that's only after 3 minutes of use.
EDIT:
crashed about 10 minutes, on an OCCT auto 'stable' system.
what would be the purpose?
MSFS and other apps will never, ever heat up a system hotter than OCCT
Instead of running an hours worth of OCCT, run 10 minutes of Linpack? Might save people some time....
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Jan 19
th
, 2009 at 1:21am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
its one hour and if it passes its stable enough
LP is for geeks that want bleeding edge IMHO
there is such a thing as overkill for normal system use
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking ««
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.