Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Autos
› This made me chuckle! +Good news for Donington Pk
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
This made me chuckle! +Good news for Donington Pk (Read 362 times)
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 4:11pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Just being a boring so and so, reading the Donington Park planning meeting report to be presented tomorrow.
Anyway this cropped up:
Quote:
18 letters of representation (including one from a Castle Donington Ward Member) have been received in respect of application 08/01356/FULM (of which 13 also make representations in respect of application 08/01386/FULM) raising the following concerns:
...and one of said representations (in bold!):
Quote:
- Noise and pollution from helicopters
- Adverse impact on aviation safety
- Motor racing is anachronistic, excessively noisy, environmentally irresponsible, brings limited economic wealth to the immediate environs and has limited visitor appeal
- Environmental pollution, including toxic waste residues from high-octane fuel exhaust gases
- Harm to wildlife / habitat
Someone doesn't like motor racing!
However, reading on, that person may be a little disappointed:
Page 52 of
http://minutes.nwleics.gov.uk:81/aksnwleicester/images/att4070.pdf
Quote:
It is therefore recommended that planning permission be granted in respect of both applications subject to the applicants entering into a Section 106 agreement to secure (i) the submission and implementation of Event Management Plans regarding access to the site for major motor racing events using the new proposed new pit and paddock facilities, (ii) the non-completion of the previously-approved club house scheme(s), (iii) the routeing of construction traffic and (iv) control over the use of the proposed club house.
«
Last Edit: Jan 8
th
, 2009 at 2:40pm by C
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 4:32pm
eno
Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK
Posts: 7802
Nothing about being able to get either in before a race meeting or more importantly OUT once the meeting is over
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 4:37pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
eno wrote
on Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 4:32pm:
Nothing about being able to get either in before a race meeting or more importantly OUT once the meeting is over
I assure you that within the 72 page report, there is
plenty
about the traffic management and parking problems - particularly in the first 30 pages!
Mind you, they really seem keen, along with the local authorities to come up with a modern system that works. They certainly have made similar systems work in the US; for example the USAF's Andrews AFB Airshow in May has no on site parking. All is "park and ride", "park and walk a mile" (or three), or "air and rail and ride".
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 4:56pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
Doubtful this will happen, its been one farce after another.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 6:13pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Craig. wrote
on Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 4:56pm:
Doubtful this will happen, its been one farce after another.
We'll see tomorrow.
Either way, its taught BRDC a lesson. They weren't as invulnerable as they thought. Potential for a much more interesting and spectator friendly (once through the gate) track too. Something the British GP hasn't had since it left the natuaral amphitheatre of Brands Hatch in 1986.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 6:29pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
I'd argue that its not at all better. Silverstone is a breeze to get into and out of. The track while not stunning in terms of overtaking was always one of the best to show the best cars at their fastest through the corners. Nothing in the donnington plans jumps out at me as interesting or groundbreaking. I believe Bernie did this simply because he knows the chances of it happening are very low (has nothing to do with tomorrow, but more to do with timetables and money issues) and he'll then have a nice mid summer slot to take a grand prix to somewhere like India or Russia where he's wanted to go for a long time now.
At the risk of being pelted with tomato's, I dont like Donnington at all. And I'd rather see Brands Hatch, Thruxton, Castle Coombe or Goodwood upgraded to host grand prix's before Donnington.
And finally, The organisers/owners want to stop all air traffic into and out of EMA on the day of the race. See that happening?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 6:38pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Craig. wrote
on Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 6:29pm:
And finally, The organisers/owners want to stop all air traffic into and out of EMA on the day of the race. See that happening?
Planned far enough in advance it could be possible, bearing in mind the extra movements and revenue guaranteed by corporate traffic during the race week. You also have the potential of juggling operations to ensure minimum exposure of aircraft over the track - mainly by using the East-West runway, and one of the north turning departures.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 6:51pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
They want all operations ceased. That means getting every airline to agree to cancel flights, DHL and co at the shipping hubs to give their deliveries a break. It simply wont happen. I just think there are far to many unreasonable expectations and demands being placed on the event for it to happen.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jan 8
th
, 2009 at 8:03am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Craig. wrote
on Jan 7
th
, 2009 at 6:51pm:
They want all operations ceased. That means getting every airline to agree to cancel flights, DHL and co at the shipping hubs to give their deliveries a break. It simply wont happen. I just think there are far to many unreasonable expectations and demands being placed on the event for it to happen.
Last year, EMA averaged 10 movements per hour. Bias the fact that a lot of these will be early morning, late evening, and higher density on weekdays as opposed to weekend, then at the required times of the weekend, with enough notice, the airlines should be able to reschedule around slots made available on the day.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jan 8
th
, 2009 at 2:41pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Planning permission granted:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/7815447.stm
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos ««
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.