Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Graphic Gallery
›
Video
› Real or fake?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Poll
Question:
Real or Fake?
Real
Fake
« Created by:
skoker
on: Dec 24
th
, 2008 at 8:29pm »
Pages:
1
2
3
Real or fake? (Read 2028 times)
Reply #30 -
Dec 31
st
, 2008 at 3:39am
BigTruck
Offline
Global Moderator
Former Sergeant of Marines
Tuscaloosa, AL
Gender:
Posts: 7161
ShaneG wrote
on Dec 26
th
, 2008 at 2:05pm:
But there is no dust from them either is the point. And the airbus didn't even rock the small planes as it blasted by.
They're flying over runways, not fine desert sand. I have sat next to runways in Hawaii while C-17's did touch and goes and didn't feel even the slightest breeze, but I have also boarded and gotten off of C-17's via rear cargo ramp while the engines were running and the jetblast was very intense (and friggin hot!!) The two you posted were real obviously, I'm still calling Bull on the KC135.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Dec 31
st
, 2008 at 7:16am
Mushroom_Farmer
Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA
Gender:
Posts: 1976
BigTruck wrote
on Dec 31
st
, 2008 at 3:39am:
They're flying over runways, not fine desert sand. I have sat next to runways in Hawaii while C-17's did touch and goes and didn't feel even the slightest breeze, but I have also boarded and gotten off of C-17's via rear cargo ramp while the engines were running and the jetblast was very intense (and friggin hot!!) The two you posted were real obviously, I'm still calling Bull on the KC135.
One time we were sitting on the hotpad waiting for a C-141 to park. He overshot the stop mark a bit and as we were just about to get out of our truck when Mr. pilot decided he had to be exactly on the mark and he proceeds to engage the thrust reversers and trottle up. We're sitting in this Dodge 1-ton pickup and it's rocking and feeling like it's gonna blow over, all the while that's going on there's also all this of debris bouncing bouncing off it. And the noise? WOW!
Didn't know a plane that large could back up until that day.
&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&
Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Jan 11
th
, 2009 at 10:58am
-Crossfire-
Offline
Colonel
Northern Canada
Gender:
Posts: 954
BigTruck wrote
on Dec 31
st
, 2008 at 3:39am:
ShaneG wrote
on Dec 26
th
, 2008 at 2:05pm:
But there is no dust from them either is the point. And the airbus didn't even rock the small planes as it blasted by.
They're flying over runways, not fine desert sand. I have sat next to runways in Hawaii while C-17's did touch and goes and didn't feel even the slightest breeze, but I have also boarded and gotten off of C-17's via rear cargo ramp while the engines were running and the jetblast was very intense (and friggin hot!!) The two you posted were real obviously, I'm still calling Bull on the KC135.
The C-17's winglets are designed to minimize wingtip vortices, so thats why you probablly didn't feel much. However the KC-135 would produce significantly more wake turbulence, even though in the video it is going fast in a clean configuration. I am also calling BS on the -135 video. That plane should look WAY bigger than it actually does, no matter what kind of camera is being used. Look at the TAP A310 video, that plane looks big.
Interesting to hear people's thoughts though.
Take a look at this one:
Watch it first without reading the comments... real or fake?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNJ8rIEPLOo
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Jan 11
th
, 2009 at 3:47pm
Mushroom_Farmer
Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA
Gender:
Posts: 1976
Quote:
Take a look at this one:
Watch it first without reading the comments... real or fake?
Obviously fake, nicely done though...um...History Channel?
On the KC-135 vid there are simply to many discrepancies (not enough dust, the moving shadow, size for distance, no movement of the underbrush). I'm still calling it fake.
&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&
Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video ««
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.