Good choice of rifle in the first shot  (My anti-sniper rifle in CoD3)

Rest are very nice shots too.

Dr.bob7 wrote on Dec 21^st, 2008 at 6:11pm:

more like 10x better looking than a wii online is MASSIVE for call of duty games on the pc

Dr.bob7 wrote on Dec 22^nd, 2008 at 2:12pm:

CoD1 is still the mutts nuts I love it.

CoD + UO was a legendary time, MP kept simple, it was fun, addictive and their was no gun stupidly powered! all balanced nicely!

they where the good old days.

nice shots, i have stayed clear of CoD5 mainly because the developers are pants on head retarded, and im hearing mixed reports of what its like but im still weary of it.

great looking shots...is this the game or the demo?...i've been looking for the demo but can't find it

well i borrowed this game from a friend who got it for christmas and ran through it in 5 hours.... and all i can think is....



what a complete step backwards from CoD4 (period obviously but i mean tech wise and gameplay) I see no huge improvements to graphics yet this is running worst! the AI is terrible, If i can be seen then all attention is on me, no matter how many team mates their are. You are the only one to ever be sat shooting, the only time your AI are with is moving between objectives (although saying that the AI when playing as russians works a bit better, but i suppose thats because your always just running down trenches etc etc..) Also the devs have so little imagination! the enemy at the gates rip off is just terrible!

i could go on for ever at how pants CoD5 is compared to CoD4 and how the devs of CoD5 should have their hands chopped off to stop them coding ever again!

but il stop the rant now

good things:

flamethrower is funny.......

bad thing of the good thing:

unlimited ammo for the flamethrower so you dont have to use it carefully, just hide for 10 secs and get another 20secs of flame. what BS!

Quote:


comparing the two is a really weird thing to do, considering both games work in a totaly differant way as you said and the way FSX works is to give maxiumum performance.

water physics in this game are not that spectacular, some ripples as they walk, the ocean doesnt look brilliant. meh all so mediocre.

J. wrote on Jan 1^st, 2009 at 9:37am:

Nothing pleases you guys...
But, i love the nazi zombies!

CoD should have ended with CoD4, the udders of the CoD cow are as dry as the desert!

@T1MT1M: all developers are in it for the money, infinty ward probably didnt want to make another CoD title, so they let treyarch make the game, with the usual pants results.

@Crussel: I agree about the story line, the game could have been better if it was possible at all to like any of the AI, but no, it was all so stereotypical (CoD4 chars where stereotypical i know, but it was new, hadnt really been done before with SAS like it was in CoD4) every WW2 shooter you play the yanks all sound like 50's war film actors, and the Ruskies are just potato eating, comrade loving clones. Treyarchs attempt at an engaging story line seemed to be
1. rip of a movie
2. do it badly
3. start over

whoever said im never pleased, your right, most games released now are pants! they are all far to across the board for my liking, trying to please everyone! genre specific works, look at Half Life, FPS through and through no RPG or RTS elements! now everygame that comes out seems to be a gang bang of multiple genres with the devs trying to grip everyone and it never works!

my shelf is full of old school game titles