Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Funny temps (Read 1879 times)
Nov 29th, 2008 at 7:17am

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
Im going to start overclocking and i went to see what temp i had to start with. i downloaded TAT, Speedfan and coretemp and they all tell me around 55 degrees C on idle and 70 degrees C on load. But when i restart and go into bios it tells me 38 - 40 degrees, any ideas what is going on?

I have E6400 with stock cooling.
a 965P-DS3P
dont think it matters but, the blow dryer that is the 4870.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 8:37am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
whats so funny about that?    Cheesy


Coretemp is reading the correct diode temp of the core. The BIOS is reading the case temp of the core which will always be 10-15c less than the true temp of the core of the processor


Confused?

There are 2 temps sensors in modern Intel processors. The one you need to be concerned about when clocking is the diode temp which can also be read wrong if you have a very new to the market processor and a older version of software to read it which is one of the dangers of playing around.

Coretemp will also display the value known as tJunction MAX. This value is where your processor goes bye-bye. There is a engineered safety point in Intel processors called tJunction (not max) where if the processor enters that temp range it will start reducing perf and if heat continues to build start shutting down.

Each processor has a spec for tJunction MAX (AKA tJMAX) and tJunction. You must find and verify those values and when testing for temps NEVER exceed tJunction during those load tests.

tJunction typically sits 25c lower than tJMAX but there can be exceptions. 25 is a good 'assumption' value if you cant find direct information on the value for a processor and be careful what you read on the internet... forums are full of idiots who think they know what they are talking about and can post incorrect information.

An example of how to evaluate a proc using a Q6600. Assuming the Q6600 is a G0 stepping processor (check CPUz for stepping code) the tJMax, if I remember correctly, in Coretemp will be 100c which means you do not want to exceed 75-78c when testing under a full load.

You can let that go a tad more to a max of 79 but if it hits 80 its too hot. It wont damage the processor but that means the processor has hit tJunction and will reduce perf to reduce heat.. therefore your cooling solution is not efficient enough or the Vcore voltage is too high, or both.

When testing use the software OCCT 1 hour test. It will ensure the memory and CPU are load tested and you can set the TEMP where the test will automatically stop in the program settings.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 9:37am
Vodka Burner   Ex Member

 
That's strange.... my Q6600 is 40 in Coretemp, and 40 in BIOS. I find it hard to believe a 15 degree delta between the two exists. Undecided Um, you said your Case temp was 50 degrees, and CPU temp was 40 degrees. Perhaps the BIOS temperatures are inversed? Try enabling and disabling PECI in BIOS, and also with CPU thermal monistor 2 (TM2).

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/221745-29-core-quad-temperature-guide
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 9:44am

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
and something i dont get also is that i live in a tropical climate and its almost always 30 degrees in my room, that and an 80 degree video card makes it always 50 degrees just in the case. so what you are saying is that when i look at bios i see the case temp at 50 degrees and the cpu temp at 40 degrees i am seeing the case temp of the core which is 40 degrees. so why is the case temp of the core lower than the case temp itself?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 10:14am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
Quote:
That's strange.... my Q6600 is 40 in Coretemp, and 40 in BIOS. I find it hard to believe a 15 degree delta between the two exists. Undecided Um, you said your Case temp was 50 degrees, and CPU temp was 40 degrees. Perhaps the BIOS temperatures are inversed? Try enabling and disabling PECI in BIOS, and also with CPU thermal monistor 2 (TM2).

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/221745-29-core-quad-temperature-guide



Its based onthe CPU and the BIOS and what is being read

that is why you can not trust what you see all the time

Q9 processors have a bug where the 2nd and 3rd cores read 10c different than cores 0-1

That Toms writeup is generic at best

Intel does not release the data on the procs and unfortunately there can be differences in which you can not ASSUME anything

there is a tCASE, tJUNCTION and tJUNCTION MAX spec

tCASE is typically 10-13c lower than tJunction

Thats one of the reasons why REALTEMP can read 2 different temps or be set to read the tCASE instead of tJ

If reading tCASE it will shift the tJunction delta down by a defined amount to compensate


not all processors are read correctly be it a BIOS, a hardware or other issue.



 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 10:17am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
T1MT1M wrote on Nov 29th, 2008 at 9:44am:
and something i dont get also is that i live in a tropical climate and its almost always 30 degrees in my room, that and an 80 degree video card makes it always 50 degrees just in the case. so what you are saying is that when i look at bios i see the case temp at 50 degrees and the cpu temp at 40 degrees i am seeing the case temp of the core which is 40 degrees. so why is the case temp of the core lower than the case temp itself?



No thats not what I am saying

The CPU TEMP in the BIOS may be reading the wrong sensor. It may not be reading the diode temp and instead the CPU CORE CASE not TOWER case temp. I dont know the board or the BIOS or the processor

I would trust coretemp over any other reading on the system and as VB mentioned, under the CPU settings in the BIOS make sure PECI is enabled if it is listed. It may not be listed becauase not all procs support it
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 10:31am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 



Lets try this again


there is an ISA buss (usually Winbond ISA on register $290) where the sensor information comes from and there is a Intel buss (usually on register $0) where the internal diode data comes from

The motherboard, BIOS or software in use can mix those up and what happens is software like Asus Probe, Speedfan, etc may read the wrong temp. Instead of the diode they are reading an offset.

Therefore you must be careful in trusting anything till you confirm what you are reading is correct

Dual core, quad core and different models/stepping can have different specs and exhibit issues in reading the right values. Somtimes it requires calibration which is a real PITA however usually Coretemp will read the diode correctly

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:00am

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
I get what you mean now because

...

^^^ from everest.

so it is 55 degrees at idle  Cry

dam

o well ty for help

its probably because i replaced the thermal paste recently because it was running hot before, it cooled it down a bit but obviously not to avg from which ive been told is 48 at idle. Im certain i did it right because i followed the arctic silver tutorial.

http://www.arcticsilver.com/pdf/appinstruct/as5/ins_as5_intel_dual_wcap.pdf

which is there.

ill just get it done when i go into work monday by a person that can play some operation on my pc Tongue.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:14am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
T1MT1M wrote on Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:00am:
I get what you mean now because

[img]

^^^ from everest.

so it is 55 degrees at idle  Cry

dam

o well ty for help

its probably because i replaced the thermal paste recently because it was running hot before, it cooled it down a bit but obviously not to avg from which ive been told is 48 at idle. Im certain i did it right because i followed the arctic silver tutorial.

http://www.arcticsilver.com/pdf/appinstruct/as5/ins_as5_intel_dual_wcap.pdf

which is there.

ill just get it done when i go into work monday by a person that can play some operation on my pc Tongue.



See the first CPU value?

Thats tCASE which is 15c different than the Diode temp


and by the way... there may be NOTHING wrong with that. Whats important is the FULL LOAD TEMP not the IDLE temp

My old QX6700 use to run idle at 51c Diode and load temped out to 78c which was perfect and max for the processor

So just becase you may show an elevated idle temp does not mean its bad.. it may be but the test to know if there is a problem is LOAD not IDLE

and use OCCT 1 hr test to check that




Your motherboard is 47c which indicates a warm climate and/or a high Northbridge voltage, or, poor tower ventalation. I would open the tower and see what the temps do

If they drop 5c or more your tower is not breathing right. A 2-3c difference can be normal 4 is borderline

you have to be careful with AS... you dont need very much and I always spread it onion skin thin over the proc... I dont use there 'squish it down' instructions cause its very easy to use too much
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:21am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
In your case I do think you are running hot

http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9T9


See the thermal spec?

61.4°C



That indicates to me you probably have a tJunction Max of 85-90c and you NEED TO CHECK THAT with CoreTemp... see what coretemp says you tJunction is

if its 85-90c you NEVER want to exceed 65-68c under a load. Always stay under 20-25c of tJuntion MAX

my rule of thumb to be safe is Diode temp no more than 5-7c higher than the Intel Thermal Spec listed for the process


so in your case I think you do have something wrong... possibly a combination of case cooling and processor HSF design/mounting or you are simply exceeding the voltages you should be running
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:24am

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
Edited:
took out stupid remark Tongue


It dosent go above 75 degrees over the full 10 mins, i know that isnt much time to check but meh.

So this pretty much means im gunna have to buy an after market cooler before i start OCing dosent it.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:28am

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 


Go back up and read... you should not be over 68c on that proc full load

your limit is 68... 70 is absolute top end

and PRIME wont full load that system

Use OCCT. Prime is old news now for load testing



And yes, if you do not have a a good aftermarket heatsink you are not going to be clocking safely

The stock heatsinks are very limited for clocking
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:31am

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
sorry we posted at same time Tongue

Tj. max = 100
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 12:00pm

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
T1MT1M wrote on Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:31am:
sorry we posted at same time Tongue

Tj. max = 100



I really question that one when the intel spec calls for 61.4

I need to shoot a question to my Intel contact to get the skinny on that one


if it is 100 then 75-78c is the max but that really sees strange for a E64 dual core proc. If the silicone is from the same batch as the Q67 then I can see that as a possibility. Usually Intel posts the Thermal Spec which runs about 5-8c lower than tJunction so it does seem strange they would apply a 61.4c max on that proc

100c tJMax is typically Intel spec'd @ 71-73c



 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 12:09pm

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
OK

just got off the phone

Yes it is 100c... and the thermal spec they posted on that proc @ 61.4c is tCASE MAX which means you have a delta of about 13-15c on that to tJunction

so with the E6400 your absolute max diode temp under a full OCCT load test is 75-78c

FSX will never run that processor that hot, ever

The delta is 13-15c less which is why the different temp you are reading from the Intel 0 to the 290 buss on the chipset


This is what I am talking about ,,, this stuff has to be confirmed cause Intel did some crazy things with some of these procs. They are not all the same in their limits or their calibration

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 12:09pm
Vodka Burner   Ex Member

 
T1MT1M wrote on Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:00am:
I get what you mean now because

[img]

^^^ from everest.

so it is 55 degrees at idle  Cry

dam

o well ty for help

its probably because i replaced the thermal paste recently because it was running hot before, it cooled it down a bit but obviously not to avg from which ive been told is 48 at idle. Im certain i did it right because i followed the arctic silver tutorial.

http://www.arcticsilver.com/pdf/appinstruct/as5/ins_as5_intel_dual_wcap.pdf

which is there.

ill just get it done when i go into work monday by a person that can play some operation on my pc Tongue.


lol Maxtor. 1337.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 12:52pm
Vodka Burner   Ex Member

 
http://www.sendspace.com/file/zk6nnw

PDF file from IDF intel. Those numbers are Tjunction, NOT tj.max, correct?

Quote:
Remember, as described earlier, in most cases the DTS
calibration point will be higher than the TJ Target values

What does that mean?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 1:03pm

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
ok cool. nothing's gunna die and ill just get a vendetta 2 some time this week. thanks for the help. Turns out they are funny temps Tongue.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 1:06pm

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
Quote:
T1MT1M wrote on Nov 29th, 2008 at 11:00am:
I get what you mean now because

[img]http://www.arcticsilver.com/pdf/appinstruct/as5/ins_as5_intel_dual_wcap.pdf[/url]

which is there.

ill just get it done when i go into work monday by a person that can play some operation on my pc Tongue.


lol Maxtor. 1337.


actually we had a maxtor and a seagate in the store and they were identical in every way shape and form besides the writing on the label.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Nov 29th, 2008 at 1:38pm

NickN   Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system

Posts: 6317
*****
 
Quote:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/zk6nnw

PDF file from IDF intel. Those numbers are Tjunction, NOT tj.max, correct?

Quote:
Remember, as described earlier, in most cases the DTS
calibration point will be higher than the TJ Target values

What does that mean?



Dont worry about it

All you need to know is tJMax and not to exceed (minus) 20-25c of that


most of the data in that PDF file is for BIOS engineers and software programmers to calibrate their products





T1MT1M

yes, you need a heatsink to be safe

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Dec 1st, 2008 at 6:05am

T1MT1M   Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo

Gender: male
Posts: 398
*****
 
Just to clear things up, I took my pc into work, took it all apart and gave it to the guy that knows everything, he then proceded to tell me that i wont learn if i dont do it myself, so i did what he said and put a blob in the middle of the heatsink until he told me to stop.

CPU now runs at 52 idle and 65 max under load. (runs so hot at idle because not very good airflow and 4870.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print