Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
›
Tweaking & Overclocking
› Funny temps
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
Funny temps (Read 1876 times)
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 7:17am
T1MT1M
Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo
Gender:
Posts: 398
Im going to start overclocking and i went to see what temp i had to start with. i downloaded TAT, Speedfan and coretemp and they all tell me around 55 degrees C on idle and 70 degrees C on load. But when i restart and go into bios it tells me 38 - 40 degrees, any ideas what is going on?
I have E6400 with stock cooling.
a 965P-DS3P
dont think it matters but, the blow dryer that is the 4870.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 8:37am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
whats so funny about that?
Coretemp is reading the correct diode temp of the core. The BIOS is reading the case temp of the core which will always be 10-15c less than the true temp of the core of the processor
Confused?
There are 2 temps sensors in modern Intel processors. The one you need to be concerned about when clocking is the diode temp which can also be read wrong if you have a very new to the market processor and a older version of software to read it which is one of the dangers of playing around.
Coretemp will also display the value known as tJunction MAX. This value is where your processor goes bye-bye. There is a engineered safety point in Intel processors called tJunction (not max) where if the processor enters that temp range it will start reducing perf and if heat continues to build start shutting down.
Each processor has a spec for tJunction MAX (AKA tJMAX) and tJunction. You must find and verify those values and when testing for temps NEVER exceed tJunction during those load tests.
tJunction typically sits 25c lower than tJMAX but there can be exceptions. 25 is a good 'assumption' value if you cant find direct information on the value for a processor and be careful what you read on the internet... forums are full of idiots who think they know what they are talking about and can post incorrect information.
An example of how to evaluate a proc using a Q6600. Assuming the Q6600 is a G0 stepping processor (check CPUz for stepping code) the tJMax, if I remember correctly, in Coretemp will be 100c which means you do not want to exceed 75-78c when testing under a full load.
You can let that go a tad more to a max of 79 but if it hits 80 its too hot. It wont damage the processor but that means the processor has hit tJunction and will reduce perf to reduce heat.. therefore your cooling solution is not efficient enough or the Vcore voltage is too high, or both.
When testing use the software OCCT 1 hour test. It will ensure the memory and CPU are load tested and you can set the TEMP where the test will automatically stop in the program settings.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 9:37am
Vodka Burner
Ex Member
That's strange.... my Q6600 is 40 in Coretemp, and 40 in BIOS. I find it hard to believe a 15 degree delta between the two exists.
Um, you said your Case temp was 50 degrees, and CPU temp was 40 degrees. Perhaps the BIOS temperatures are inversed? Try enabling and disabling PECI in BIOS, and also with CPU thermal monistor 2 (TM2).
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/221745-29-core-quad-temperature-guide
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 9:44am
T1MT1M
Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo
Gender:
Posts: 398
and something i dont get also is that i live in a tropical climate and its almost always 30 degrees in my room, that and an 80 degree video card makes it always 50 degrees just in the case. so what you are saying is that when i look at bios i see the case temp at 50 degrees and the cpu temp at 40 degrees i am seeing the case temp of the core which is 40 degrees. so why is the case temp of the core lower than the case temp itself?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 10:14am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
Quote:
That's strange.... my Q6600 is 40 in Coretemp, and 40 in BIOS. I find it hard to believe a 15 degree delta between the two exists.
Um, you said your Case temp was 50 degrees, and CPU temp was 40 degrees. Perhaps the BIOS temperatures are inversed? Try enabling and disabling PECI in BIOS, and also with CPU thermal monistor 2 (TM2).
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/221745-29-core-quad-temperature-guide
Its based onthe CPU and the BIOS and what is being read
that is why you can not trust what you see all the time
Q9 processors have a bug where the 2nd and 3rd cores read 10c different than cores 0-1
That Toms writeup is generic at best
Intel does not release the data on the procs and unfortunately there can be differences in which you can not ASSUME anything
there is a tCASE, tJUNCTION and tJUNCTION MAX spec
tCASE is typically 10-13c lower than tJunction
Thats one of the reasons why REALTEMP can read 2 different temps or be set to read the tCASE instead of tJ
If reading tCASE it will shift the tJunction delta down by a defined amount to compensate
not all processors are read correctly be it a BIOS, a hardware or other issue.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 10:17am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
T1MT1M wrote
on Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 9:44am:
and something i dont get also is that i live in a tropical climate and its almost always 30 degrees in my room, that and an 80 degree video card makes it always 50 degrees just in the case. so what you are saying is that when i look at bios i see the case temp at 50 degrees and the cpu temp at 40 degrees i am seeing the case temp of the core which is 40 degrees. so why is the case temp of the core lower than the case temp itself?
No thats not what I am saying
The CPU TEMP in the BIOS may be reading the wrong sensor. It may not be reading the diode temp and instead the CPU CORE CASE not TOWER case temp. I dont know the board or the BIOS or the processor
I would trust coretemp over any other reading on the system and as VB mentioned, under the CPU settings in the BIOS make sure PECI is enabled if it is listed. It may not be listed becauase not all procs support it
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 10:31am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
Lets try this again
there is an ISA buss (usually Winbond ISA on register $290) where the sensor information comes from and there is a Intel buss (usually on register $0) where the internal diode data comes from
The motherboard, BIOS or software in use can mix those up and what happens is software like Asus Probe, Speedfan, etc may read the wrong temp. Instead of the diode they are reading an offset.
Therefore you must be careful in trusting anything till you confirm what you are reading is correct
Dual core, quad core and different models/stepping can have different specs and exhibit issues in reading the right values. Somtimes it requires calibration which is a real PITA however usually Coretemp will read the diode correctly
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:00am
T1MT1M
Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo
Gender:
Posts: 398
I get what you mean now because
^^^ from everest.
so it is 55 degrees at idle
dam
o well ty for help
its probably because i replaced the thermal paste recently because it was running hot before, it cooled it down a bit but obviously not to avg from which ive been told is 48 at idle. Im certain i did it right because i followed the arctic silver tutorial.
http://www.arcticsilver.com/pdf/appinstruct/as5/ins_as5_intel_dual_wcap.pdf
which is there.
ill just get it done when i go into work monday by a person that can play some operation on my pc
.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:14am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
T1MT1M wrote
on Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:00am:
I get what you mean now because
[img]
^^^ from everest.
so it is 55 degrees at idle
dam
o well ty for help
its probably because i replaced the thermal paste recently because it was running hot before, it cooled it down a bit but obviously not to avg from which ive been told is 48 at idle. Im certain i did it right because i followed the arctic silver tutorial.
http://www.arcticsilver.com/pdf/appinstruct/as5/ins_as5_intel_dual_wcap.pdf
which is there.
ill just get it done when i go into work monday by a person that can play some operation on my pc
.
See the first CPU value?
Thats tCASE which is 15c different than the Diode temp
and by the way... there may be NOTHING wrong with that. Whats important is the FULL LOAD TEMP not the IDLE temp
My old QX6700 use to run idle at 51c Diode and load temped out to 78c which was perfect and max for the processor
So just becase you may show an elevated idle temp does not mean its bad.. it may be but the test to know if there is a problem is LOAD not IDLE
and use OCCT 1 hr test to check that
Your motherboard is 47c which indicates a warm climate and/or a high Northbridge voltage, or, poor tower ventalation. I would open the tower and see what the temps do
If they drop 5c or more your tower is not breathing right. A 2-3c difference can be normal 4 is borderline
you have to be careful with AS... you dont need very much and I always spread it onion skin thin over the proc... I dont use there 'squish it down' instructions cause its very easy to use too much
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:21am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
In your case I do think you are running hot
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9T9
See the thermal spec?
61.4°C
That indicates to me you probably have a tJunction Max of 85-90c and you NEED TO CHECK THAT with CoreTemp... see what coretemp says you tJunction is
if its 85-90c you NEVER want to exceed 65-68c under a load. Always stay under 20-25c of tJuntion MAX
my rule of thumb to be safe is Diode temp no more than 5-7c higher than the Intel Thermal Spec listed for the process
so in your case I think you do have something wrong... possibly a combination of case cooling and processor HSF design/mounting or you are simply exceeding the voltages you should be running
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:24am
T1MT1M
Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo
Gender:
Posts: 398
Edited:
took out stupid remark
It dosent go above 75 degrees over the full 10 mins, i know that isnt much time to check but meh.
So this pretty much means im gunna have to buy an after market cooler before i start OCing dosent it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:28am
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
Go back up and read... you should not be over 68c on that proc full load
your limit is 68... 70 is absolute top end
and PRIME wont full load that system
Use OCCT. Prime is old news now for load testing
And yes, if you do not have a a good aftermarket heatsink you are not going to be clocking safely
The stock heatsinks are very limited for clocking
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:31am
T1MT1M
Offline
Colonel
Hello!
Naboo
Gender:
Posts: 398
sorry we posted at same time
Tj. max = 100
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 12:00pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
T1MT1M wrote
on Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 11:31am:
sorry we posted at same time
Tj. max = 100
I really question that one when the intel spec calls for 61.4
I need to shoot a question to my Intel contact to get the skinny on that one
if it is 100 then 75-78c is the max but that really sees strange for a E64 dual core proc. If the silicone is from the same batch as the Q67 then I can see that as a possibility. Usually Intel posts the Thermal Spec which runs about 5-8c lower than tJunction so it does seem strange they would apply a 61.4c max on that proc
100c tJMax is typically Intel spec'd @ 71-73c
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Nov 29
th
, 2008 at 12:09pm
NickN
Offline
Colonel
FSX runs fine... the problem
is you or your system
Posts: 6317
OK
just got off the phone
Yes it is 100c... and the thermal spec they posted on that proc @ 61.4c is tCASE MAX which means you have a delta of about 13-15c on that to tJunction
so with the E6400 your absolute max diode temp under a full OCCT load test is 75-78c
FSX will never run that processor that hot, ever
The delta is 13-15c less which is why the different temp you are reading from the Intel 0 to the 290 buss on the chipset
This is what I am talking about ,,, this stuff has to be confirmed cause Intel did some crazy things with some of these procs. They are not all the same in their limits or their calibration
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking ««
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.