Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Report:  FIA Castrates Spa (Read 826 times)
Sep 1st, 2008 at 12:36pm

The Ruptured Duck   Offline
Colonel
Legally sane since yesterday!
Wichita, KS

Gender: male
Posts: 2614
*****
 
http://formula-one.speedtv.com/article/f1-spa-f1-layout-to-be-shortened-report/

Get rid of Stavelot?  If they keep crapping up all these classic tracks F-1 will get the NASCAR "cookie-cutter" track syndrome, where there isn't much difference between each race.  The FIA needs to focus more on tradition, rather than newer and bigger circuits
 

"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin&&&&"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only thus will he fully understand the world in which he lives." - Socrates&&&&" Flying is a religion. A religion that asymilates all who get a taste of it." - Me&&&&"Make the most out of yourself, for that is all there is of you"- Ralf Waldo Emerson&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Sep 1st, 2008 at 3:07pm

Mushroom_Farmer   Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1976
*****
 
The Ruptured Duck wrote on Sep 1st, 2008 at 12:36pm:
http://formula-one.speedtv.com/article/f1-spa-f1-layout-to-be-shortened-report/

Get rid of Stavelot?  If they keep crapping up all these classic tracks F-1 will get the NASCAR "cookie-cutter" track syndrome, where there isn't much difference between each race.  The FIA needs to focus more on tradition, rather than newer and bigger circuits


Silly me. And here I always thought the idea of running on different track layouts was to to challenge the drivers and bring out their unique talents.  Roll Eyes
  If you make it 100% safe, it ain't racing! It's a group of b00bs just driving fast. I can watch more action on the highway. Wink
 

...&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&  Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Sep 1st, 2008 at 3:15pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
What rubbish. Then again, having seen what they did to Hockenheim (not only shortening it, but they digging up the remains of the old loop), it wouldn't surprise me.

One of the joys of Spa is its length.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Sep 1st, 2008 at 3:30pm
CD.   Ex Member

 
Spa has always been one of my favourite tracks, as a spectator (albeit on the TV) and a driver (albeit on the Playstation  Tongue )

It's worth remembering that the current layout is considerably shorter than the original.. along with Nurburgring, Hockenheim, Interlagos etc. The list goes on. The only track which has actually got longer is Silverstone, due to the addition of numerous chicanes...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Sep 1st, 2008 at 3:33pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
I'd love to know the excuses for this?
Safety? we've just witnessed a race round a high speed track with walls for barriers and no run off, without incident.
Distance? same thing since brand new valencia is only a few hundred yards longer than Spa.
Overtaking? Not one of the tilkedromes have provided overtaking on a consistant basis.
Excitement? The Schumi hakkinnen pass between the other guy down the main straight? Montoya's pass around the outside at eau rouge. Michael schumachers fighting march down the pitlane to find DC. If theres one track which provides excitment its Spa.

It's another case of Bernie and Max getting together and trying to come up with ways to piss off the F1 fan base.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Sep 1st, 2008 at 5:06pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Quote:
Spa has always been one of my favourite tracks, as a spectator (albeit on the TV) and a driver (albeit on the Playstation  Tongue )

It's worth remembering that the current layout is considerably shorter than the original..


Well yes, but circuits that length are somewhat impractical. Having said that, the current layout is a good compromise. Sadlu I fear this is another excuse for another "child of Tilke"...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Sep 1st, 2008 at 7:39pm

todayshorse   Offline
Colonel
'Ten Thousand Blister.....'
England

Gender: male
Posts: 2806
*****
 
Apalling, although it is disputed over on the Autosport forum - the circuit owner or somebody refutes these claims, or somthing like that!

Having been to Spa (with the old bus stop) i can confirm that its possibly the greatest place to go and watch a race...without doubt! Seeing Senna, Mansell, Prost, Berger, et al flat out through Blanchimont is somthing ill never forget.

Standing at the lowest part of eau rouge is quite somthing as well - i dont know if you still can but its certainly a 'hairs up on the back of the neck' place, in fact the whole circuit is. Its a most bizarre place for the motor racing fan, i know that. I didnt know you could feel, smell and almost touch history...

Ive probably mentioned it before though so ill shut up!

Long live the proper spa! Although in its original form it was no doubt more awesome Cool
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Sep 2nd, 2008 at 12:52am

The Ruptured Duck   Offline
Colonel
Legally sane since yesterday!
Wichita, KS

Gender: male
Posts: 2614
*****
 
C wrote on Sep 1st, 2008 at 5:06pm:
Quote:
Spa has always been one of my favourite tracks, as a spectator (albeit on the TV) and a driver (albeit on the Playstation  Tongue )

It's worth remembering that the current layout is considerably shorter than the original..


Well yes, but circuits that length are somewhat impractical. Having said that, the current layout is a good compromise. Sadlu I fear this is another excuse for another "child of Tilke"...


Child of Tilke?  Them boys ain't right!

I would like to nail Max and Bernie in the nads with a rusty pipe.  But maybe thats because I've had a crappy day at work
 

"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin&&&&"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only thus will he fully understand the world in which he lives." - Socrates&&&&" Flying is a religion. A religion that asymilates all who get a taste of it." - Me&&&&"Make the most out of yourself, for that is all there is of you"- Ralf Waldo Emerson&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Sep 2nd, 2008 at 1:16am

todayshorse   Offline
Colonel
'Ten Thousand Blister.....'
England

Gender: male
Posts: 2806
*****
 
Max may well enjoy that Grin
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Sep 2nd, 2008 at 6:27am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
todayshorse wrote on Sep 2nd, 2008 at 1:16am:
Max may well enjoy that Grin


Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Sep 2nd, 2008 at 12:50pm

Mushroom_Farmer   Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1976
*****
 
todayshorse wrote on Sep 2nd, 2008 at 1:16am:
Max may well enjoy that Grin

  Only if you dress as a......, never mind. Grin Grin
 

...&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&  Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Sep 4th, 2008 at 1:35pm

machineman9   Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England

Gender: male
Posts: 5255
*****
 
The FIA are really annoying me as of recent.

Making the cars slower each year, making them have more drag, more bits sticking out for control over speed and just generally limiting everything.

It will eventually turn into racing where 50 layers of bubble-wrap around all the cars and corners is a minimum.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Sep 4th, 2008 at 3:20pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
machineman9 wrote on Sep 4th, 2008 at 1:35pm:
The FIA are really annoying me as of recent.

Making the cars slower each year, making them have more drag, more bits sticking out for control over speed and just generally limiting everything.

It will eventually turn into racing where 50 layers of bubble-wrap around all the cars and corners is a minimum.

In general the cars are actually faster in the corners, those bits being sprouted are not the FIA, but the teams taking advantage of the FIA's rules.
Next year things will be back to basics. No winglets, no messy designs. Lower wider front wing, higher and narrower rear wing, smaller diffuser, and slick tyres.
Sadly three areas in need of change still arn't being addressed.
1: The 19,000 RPM limit, until that is removed, overtaking is a thing of lunges into corners.
2: The type of engine/engine freeze. The 2.4 V8 just doesn't have the power or driveability of the 3.0L V10's to allow proper out of corner drag race's and they are all generally within 14 to 15BHP of each other.
3: Ride height. Until they allow teams to lower the cars properly like they were in the 90's, there will always be the problem of dirty air affecting the car behind.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 4th, 2008 at 3:29pm

todayshorse   Offline
Colonel
'Ten Thousand Blister.....'
England

Gender: male
Posts: 2806
*****
 
Hell yeah! Get rid of those stupid planks, and lets have titanium skid strips back! Slicks and sparks - thats what we want! Plus up the engine CC - or lets have turbos, or V10's,and V12's totaly unrestricted like it should be. Its the pinnacle of motor racing yet its turning into a one make series more and more every year, or it seems to be Undecided

I know they have to keep the costs down but your not telling me teams (apart from renault Grin) are not spending nearly as much as they used to trying to get more out of those engines by other means rather than pure 'steps' like they used to. And if they aint spending it on engines, then they are on this KERS thing....
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Sep 5th, 2008 at 12:34am

Mushroom_Farmer   Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1976
*****
 
Well, you'd have to go back pretty far to find a year when one make didn't dominate. As for turbos....um, no...not again. I'm sure Honda would love that though. Wink The best racing was and always will be when it was basically unrestricted, but technology put an end to that. Indy was the same way. I remember seeing all sorts of wild designs in the 1960s-1970s era, many were built not in huge mega shops, but in small garages by men not necessarily with college degrees but with big imaginations. Sadly those days are gone, never to return.
 The thing that irks me the most right now is making all the teams use a standardized engine management system. It seems that would only work if all teams were using the same engine. Then it's just another boring spec racing series like a certain sedan division in the states.
 

...&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&  Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Sep 5th, 2008 at 6:09am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Mushroom_Farmer wrote on Sep 5th, 2008 at 12:34am:
Well, you'd have to go back pretty far to find a year when one make didn't dominate. As for turbos....um, no...not again. I'm sure Honda would love that though. Wink The best racing was and always will be when it was basically unrestricted, but technology put an end to that. Indy was the same way. I remember seeing all sorts of wild designs in the 1960s-1970s era, many were built not in huge mega shops, but in small garages by men not necessarily with college degrees but with big imaginations. Sadly those days are gone, never to return.
 The thing that irks me the most right now is making all the teams use a standardized engine management system. It seems that would only work if all teams were using the same engine. Then it's just another boring spec racing series like a certain sedan division in the states.

Fingers crossed, 2011 will see the start of something new in F1. Generally the teams are now working together to make the rules from then on. I cant imagine the standard SCU will stick around. I want Ferrari's digital wheel back. They could do so much to the car with that.
Turbo's will never be back in F1. Too expensive, and far too much time and money would be spent constantly upgrading performance from them. Would go against the whole "money saving" theme Adolf Moseley and Bernie Mussolini want to push through. Save the bolivian tree fly and all that. Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Sep 5th, 2008 at 7:04am

todayshorse   Offline
Colonel
'Ten Thousand Blister.....'
England

Gender: male
Posts: 2806
*****
 
hmm no one for turbos then? Interesting. I guess thats a throwback to the cars i remember when i got interested in F1 - and the later glory days of the TAG porsche, and Honda. Amazing engines.

oh well. Id be happy with unrestricted on the engines, do what you like type stuff. The car has to be this long, this wide and this high and you cant put bits here but you can do this.....thats how it should be i think, but i guess those days are over Sad

I think turbo tech has moved on a lot from the late 70's and 80's - I was quite atsonished at the power figures of a VW Jetta i was looking at the other day, turbo 1.4, nearly 170bhp! And i dont think it will be a petrol drinking fire breathing push-you-in-the-back-of-your-seat type car (such as one i used to own - boy did that drink the gas!!!!) but more of a 'you wouldnt know it was a turbo' type car. Must go for a test drive!
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Sep 5th, 2008 at 7:41am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
I wouldn't say no to a turbo engine personally. It was recently discussed with a 1.4 or even a 1.2L engine. But I'd much rather see the V10 back. I still think its the best of the bunch. I know a lot of people liked the V12 for the sound it made, myself included.
But for sheer noise, power and pretty much what F1 should be about. The scream of a V10 was pure perfection.
I agree with you, it should be about unrestricted performance. And this whole "lets do F1 on the cheap" is getting silly. GP2 cars are now less than 10 seconds a lap slower than the fastest F1 cars, and only 4 seconds a lap slower than the back of the grid teams. That essentially means that some GP2 cars, are on a level of some of the back of the grid teams of the late 90's. Thats just not right.
The head of the Vauxhall VXR team for the BTCC said it best when asked if he thought Diesel engines were the future, he said they might be but shouldn't be because Motorsport is about the excitement, and the noise. Fans dont come to the track to watch a bunch of quiet cars potter about, they like to hear the engines.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Sep 5th, 2008 at 2:08pm

Mushroom_Farmer   Offline
Colonel
To the Sooper-Coop Fred
Indiana, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1976
*****
 
Quote:
The head of the Vauxhall VXR team for the BTCC said it best when asked if he thought Diesel engines were the future, he said they might be but shouldn't be because Motorsport is about the excitement, and the noise. Fans dont come to the track to watch a bunch of quiet cars potter about, they like to hear the engines.


  IMO there's maybe too much attention toward the fans and not not enough toward racing for the sake of racing. In the beginning years of motorsport spectators were the by-product of racing and the racing for the most part was unrestricted.
  Today's racing wouldn't survive without fans and sponsors because those involved have simply gotten too greedy for the green. It isn't as much about the racing any more, but about a big paycheck. To draw that check you need to have a large fan base, sponsors, and video rights to sell for big $$$.

  There was a Cummins Diesel raced at Indy twice that I know of. Once in 1931 with a Model A Duesenberg fitted with an 85hp, 361ci four-cylinder diesel. It qualified last, ran the whole race without pitting, and finished 13th. And again in 1952 Cummins was back with the inline turbocharged Cummins 6.6L Kurtis Kraft Special, which won the pole position with a speed of 138.010 mph and was 4 mph faster than Ferrari's  V-12.
  Indy also had the STP Special turbine cars, which came very close to winning.
  Now we have the Audi diesel in ALMS and I love it. I don't care about noise and to me excitement is a pass for the lead while going into a difficult corner.

  As for turbos I remember the Can-Am series where in 1973 the Porsche 917 had a 5.4L 1500 powerplant. Porsche only went to Can-Am after the FIA banned the 240 mph supercars from the period. Unfortunately they were killed off by rules restrictions.

just my 2˘ Wink
 

...&&&&"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made it flameproof." &&  Spinnaker Software chairman William Bowman, 1985
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Sep 6th, 2008 at 11:25am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Craig. wrote on Sep 5th, 2008 at 7:41am:
The head of the Vauxhall VXR team for the BTCC said it best when asked if he thought Diesel engines were the future, he said they might be but shouldn't be because Motorsport is about the excitement, and the noise. Fans dont come to the track to watch a bunch of quiet cars potter about, they like to hear the engines.


Well, we all kmow how "good" Vauxhall diesels are. If he was running a VW/Seat/Skoda/Audi team his views may differ! I think the Seat TDi in BTCC, the Audi R10 and Peugeot prototypes are fair demonstration of this!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print