I havent read the previous topic on this, but im going to add my thoughts anyway

Hopefully soon they will go back, and hopefully they will prove without doubt that it wasnt faked. Wether that be photos or actual equipment left from all the landings thats brought back to earth or what, i dont know.

Ive read a lot on the various hoax theories, and came to the conclusion that most are widly,utterly and completly mad, most are proved wrong, and only one or two could mabye be genuine.

Ive also read, watched, and looked at loads of stuff on the Apollo programme as a whole, and Mercury, and the Gemini programmes before them. Its fascinating stuff, and i wish i could remember the name of a book i read that was as thick as two bricks that dealt with the apollo programme which was a book i couldnt put down, but i cant.

I can understand the reasoning behind faking 11, and carrying out the other missions in full, for real - i think anyway!

I still think that it happened as was broadcast though. If it was faked, other countries monitoring the final stage of the launch vehicle,(which usualy impacted with the moon, and registerd on equipment left from earlier landings in the case of later missions) and the spacecraft themselves, would have surely blown the whistle.

It would be too good for the russians NOT to proclaim the americans had faked it, imagine the scenes if they had done given the climate at the time!

Unless 11 just orbited the moon, without actualy landing. But if you go all that way, why just not the hell land?

Apollo 8 came close to the lunar surface, but had no lander,  and Apollo 10's lander came within about 8 miles of the lunar surface. Why do all this then fake 11?

When Nasa do go back, hopefully we will then really know!

I'm not a fan of Mythbusters (I think they're annoying dorks) but I went out of my way to watch this one.  I was never a hoax believer but if I were ...

Unparallel shadows - Completely convinced

Light in shadow - Completely convinced

Footprints in powder and 1/6 G "hop" - They can't completely duplicate these on Earth but NASA could not have predicted these effects based on Earthbound observations.  Mostly convinced.

Quote:


I forgot about that one.

But the hoaxers are so convinced that if the UN commissioned an independent fleet to land at every Apollo landing site, and if that commission came back with photos and artifacts and eyewitness testimony, they would claim that the UN commission was a hoax.  We can't win!

No comment Fozzer?

WebbPA wrote on Aug 29^th, 2008 at 9:02pm:


That or the UN took all the "old props", placed them about and then took the pictures 

Quote:


Oooppss....Sorry!...Space Time-Lag!... ...

Fantastic Videos!... ...!

Such a laugh listening to all those comical Red Neck voices.... ...

..and as always...

...giving me/us the opportunity to wind you up, and pull your tiny little Plonker, concerning Manned Space Travel, and the Moon Landing Conspiracies.... ... ... ...!

Its something we love doing, to extract the Urine, and have a laugh at the same time!... ...!

Paul...now where did I put that Coat Hanger?... and that Star-Spangled Banner?...there must be somewhere else we can stick it?...... ... ... ...!

...we love it down here, amongst our fellow Earthlings!... ... ... ...!

A recent flight over the Nevada Desert...>>>>

http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1246988725

.... ....!

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html

Hagar wrote on Aug 6^th, 2008 at 7:19am:



And the implications of 40 years of Lies being told as truth?

or am I taking your post out of context Doug?

Anyway, for what its worth, I'm a believer....