Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
X-Plane 9 (Read 1377 times)
Jun 22nd, 2008 at 8:37pm

th3flyboy   Offline
Colonel
realism ftw

Gender: male
Posts: 154
*****
 
Well folks, I got X-plane 9, here are some screens i took flying over the nearest city to my house...

one thing you'll notice is that the scenery isn't as detailed in some aspects as FSX. The main problem with the scenery is that the airports have little if any buildings at them, even at LAX. Also there are no landmarks in X-Plane, both of these are caused because the guys who made it, it's only like a 5 person operation, not a freaking 200 person group like ACES.

Now on to the shots:

...

...

...

my one discrepancy i saw there that really stood out though was, THERE IS NO IKEA IN THAT CITY!!!!

all in all, FSX and X-Plane are good to be together, but you can't recommend one over the other, as X-Plane is better at flight modeling, and FSX is prettier and has a bigger community.

oh also, no these are not maxed out, as i didnt want to fly in a slideshow.
 

my rig&&intel q6600 quad core, geforce GTX 280 OCX 1 gig, 4 gigs 800mhz ram, nforce 680i lt sli, 750 gigs hd, dvd rw drive, 23 inch lcd monitor, windows vista ultimate sp2 x64/Win 7 RC x64 dual boot, TrackIR 4 Pro with Trackclip, Razer Lachechis Mouse, Microsoft Sidewinder Precision pro, 5.1 speakers, logitech racing wheel.&&&&my current sims: fsx, falcon 4.0 (modded, red viper or openfalcon, depending on my mood), rfactor, GTR Evolution, il2 1946, X-Plane 9, ArmA 2, Steel Beasts Pro PE
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jun 23rd, 2008 at 3:55am
waspiflab   Ex Member

 
one thing you'll notice is that the scenery isn't as detailed in some aspects as FSX. oh also, no these are not maxed out, as i didnt want to fly in a slideshow


You need higher settings to get the better detail:-? I'm confused Cheesy
Still looks good to me
...
...
...

cheees.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jun 23rd, 2008 at 3:59am

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
An excellent example of the disadvantage of using "VFR Photographic Scenery"....

All you see is a perfectly "flat" photograph of the ground.... Shocked...!

...which is why I abandoned using it it many years ago.. Wink...!

I much prefer Microsoft's automatic 3D Autogen Scenery... Smiley...!

It may not accurately represent your area, but at least the scenery doesn't  appear as a flat, "blurry" mess at ground level... Shocked...!

Paul...G-BPLF....FS 2004.... Cool...!

 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 1:50am
Vodka Burner   Ex Member

 
Fozzer wrote on Jun 23rd, 2008 at 3:59am:
An excellent example of the disadvantage of using "VFR Photographic Scenery"....

All you see is a perfectly "flat" photograph of the ground.... Shocked...!

...which is why I abandoned using it it many years ago.. Wink...!

I much prefer Microsoft's automatic 3D Autogen Scenery... Smiley...!

It may not accurately represent your area, but at least the scenery doesn't  appear as a flat, "blurry" mess at ground level... Shocked...!

Paul...G-BPLF....FS 2004.... Cool...!


X-Plane 9 HAS autogen that is far more dense than in fs2004. FS2004 and X-Plane look like a blurry mess at ground level. Fsx is the only one that is sharp.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jun 24th, 2008 at 12:08pm

th3flyboy   Offline
Colonel
realism ftw

Gender: male
Posts: 154
*****
 
actually, that is the default scenery, as far as the objects though, if I were to crank it up a bit more, the whole ground would be bursting with objects, but when I do that, my flight becomes a slideshow, I'll try to show you guys some higher settings in a little bit, but right now I want to see if I can get some other stuff for it. Also, one thing to note is that X-Plane has a program out there that can convert MSFS 04 and possibly FSX scenery files in to X-Plane, and it is capable of putting in the MSFS addon scenery both payware and freeware and even the default stuff. The reason I don't do that is mine is still a pretty clean install, as I only just got it. As far as the settings, that is about medium on the autogen and maxed as far as ground res. I suspect that the reason the ground is blurry is that to be honest, X-Plane isn't about graphics or storyline missions, and it doesn't have very good AI planes (you wont see them taking off, landing, or taxing, they had this in v7 but when you see the space shuttle making a touch and go at a grass strip, yeah) X-Plane is more based around the actual simulation. The way things are done in X-Plane are not focused mainly on pretty graphics, but are more focused on realistic handling of flight. It's a case of what's more important, pretty graphics, or having birdstrikes that affect your aircraft. Some guy posted on one of the X-Plane community sites a pic of him flying a 747 and a bird struck his windshield and you could see the windshield cracked and the gore on the windshield. That is the uniqueness of X-Plane, not that the sim is pretty, but that it models the more subtle nuances of flight.
 

my rig&&intel q6600 quad core, geforce GTX 280 OCX 1 gig, 4 gigs 800mhz ram, nforce 680i lt sli, 750 gigs hd, dvd rw drive, 23 inch lcd monitor, windows vista ultimate sp2 x64/Win 7 RC x64 dual boot, TrackIR 4 Pro with Trackclip, Razer Lachechis Mouse, Microsoft Sidewinder Precision pro, 5.1 speakers, logitech racing wheel.&&&&my current sims: fsx, falcon 4.0 (modded, red viper or openfalcon, depending on my mood), rfactor, GTR Evolution, il2 1946, X-Plane 9, ArmA 2, Steel Beasts Pro PE
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 2:26am
waspiflab   Ex Member

 
I played the demo and quite liked it maybe if it drops in price I'll think I'll buy it.
Can you post some more shots soon Wink
Cheers.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jun 25th, 2008 at 1:25pm

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
That is a big jump from X-Plane 8 to 9 Shocked
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print