Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
Flight School
› Re: Slipped off left again
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
Pages:
1
Re: Slipped off left again (Read 2878 times)
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 8:19am
gsamsonite
Offline
Major
Hello!
Posts: 4
Are you serious??????
That is absolutely ridiculous. Are you really a Qantas pilot?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 8:54am
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
No, not a Qantas pilot. I'm a cadet, which means they are training me how to fly from the start. At the moment I'm flying little C172s and around 70 hours of experience. So guess what, I still make a few mistakes. So does everyone who is learning to fly. I can proudly say mistakes do happen, but I learn from them. This is probably one of my worse, which in perspective isn't all that bad. If you had flown an aircraft, you may understand just how hard it is.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 10:05am
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
There are many things that will happen to you behind the yoke, that will leave you a wiser, better pilot. Some during training, but most, obviously, well after training. I admire that you're willing to share them... most aren't.
It sounds like there was a significant cross-wind during that takeoff ?
If so, then a "launch" into ground-effect, with an immediate crab-angle, was the best way to handle it. But not as reaction. That's something you'd plan on doing. It sounds here, that it was a reaction on your part.
If crosswind was not a factor, I'd need more information before commenting further.
No matter what happened... the bottom line is that you
kept your head about you, and piloted your way through it
. If you had enough airspeed for for lift (which you obvioulsy did), then aborting the takeoff with significant yaw could have been much worse.
It might have been a poor choice to continue with a takeoff that started with yaw problems from the first application of power... but it was good piloting on your part to get out of there in one piece.
Again.. I need more information..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 2:33pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Wind? takeoff from dead stop, or on the roll...?
This problem is just plain mysterious without more info... unless you inadvertently start the roll with the nosewheel cocked to the left or there is a big-BIG! left crosswind, a 172 should not charge to the left like you describe, even if you're late with the right foot to compensate for prop/engine effects. That's been my experience, anyway, with near 200 hrs in type.
But I also agree with BH that "flying out of it" is always the wise course, rather than becoming resigned to a trip into the weeds.
But for heaven's sake, be sure to seek more advice from the instructor(s) you are flying with... ultimately, the instructor is responsible, indirectly, for the progress of the student. Your training issues belong equally to the instructor.
If that isn't part of Qantas' cadet program, it should be.
And one more thing: never assume the tires will help much, friction-wise, in this situation.
They're not really made for that. Don't wait until it's obvious they will not help keep you straight.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 5:45pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Rotty's right... even 180hp C172s have pretty negligible torque/p-factor to deal with. Any x-wind at all presents more of a directional problem during a takeoff roll. And the odd thing is that it sounds like you were dealing with a x-wind from the right, not the left.
If you've ever flown and older C172 and then hopped into a newer model (or one with new rudder/nose-wheel hardware), the difference is dramatic. I've flow C172s that had so much slop betwen the pedals and the nose-wheel, that differential braking was required while taxing. And on newer models, the ground steering was was very precise with pedals alone. Maybe after taxiing onto the runway, you had a sloppy nose-wheel, already cocked to the left. And if you were already aimed slightly to the left, the addition on torque/p-factor added to the mix would have you applying LOTS of right pedal.
The other point of Rotty's that is most important; is your instructors evaluation. He knows you, and he's ultimately responsible for your training. It's hard for us to "instruct" by forum post.. so before incorporating ANYthing we say.. please run it by him. I've seen two very seasoned and competent instructors get into heated debates about how to handle their students.
With that said... I'm thinking that the scenario I mentioned, might be what happened... and you probably over corrected. I'm just having trouble understanding how you got into a drifting situation like this. You say that the nose was point right, but the plane was drifting left.. and it sounds like it started happeneing very early...as in, right from the begining of the takeoff roll. I know things happen quickly when we're caught off guard in the cockpit..so maybe the loss of traction happened further into the roll than we're understanding... Although, If you were alone (and from one of your photos, you look rather "small" (as in WELL under 200lb), and if you were flying on tanks under 1/2 full.. a C172 will get up to "lauch" speed in a hurry.
Anyway..a wind from the right would call for LEFT pedal at first. Right pedal would just compound the wind-induced directional problem. Then, as lift began to negate the tires, you'd have to decide when to launch into ground-effect, because drifting would set in. That can be a scary and critical time for a new pilot. Eventually, you won't give this stuff too much thought. You'll be instinctively flying the airplane as you roll out onto the runway.. and your feet will do their stuff on reflex. You won't think, "OK, first I'm countering the torque, then I'll deal with the wind".. it will all just happen. Every takeoff is a different dance with the pedals..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 7:40pm
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
I was doing a solo nav and had flown about 70 minutes and done a full stop landing to stretch my legs. I had done a fuel check before take off and it was at around 165 litres, or 118kg, or around 260 pounds. Aircraft BEW is 797kg and I'm around 65kg, total weight would have been 975kg or around 2145 pounds.
The take off was done from a full stop in light winds, the windsock was limper than a 90 year old. There were no flaps extended and the initial roll under low power was straight. I always ensure that I am running straight before applying full power.
When full power was applied the nose pulled left due to slipstream, I think being more likely than torque. Its not a sudden or powerful pull, but it is noticeable and is usually easily corrected with some right rudder. When the nose swung left this time I did the usual of correcting right, admittedly it was a bit late but I have corrected from worse. I applied the right rudder, it wasn't a hard correction. The nose moved right so it was straight with the runway and the aircraft continued left, I guess due to inertia. I heard the tyres scraping the runway and it reminded me of what happened last time. Rather than abort and run off the runway like last time I lifted early into ground effect before climbing.
I was watching the ASI during the role, following the SOPs. This all happened in the range of 35-45 knots.
EDIT: Now that I think back, when I lifted I barely stayed in ground effect, the aircraft seemed to have enough speed/lift to climb out and accelerate to best angle speed. It accelerated quite quickly was I was off the ground.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 7:50pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
I'd just chalk it up to one of those learning experiences. To this day, things happen to me for the first time. Sometimes I fully understand what happened; sometimes not.
I think you have a good enough understanding of it all to remember the important stuff.. and the poise to work through it when it happens. Most important is that you're humble enough to want to talk about it.
Eventually, the rudder dance will be second nature.. even with nasty x-winds
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 8:32pm
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
The only conclusion I can draw is, like last time, the aircraft was light enough to start to lift before my usual rotation speed. I did talk to my instructor about it, but like last time he was stumped.
I'll just keep in mind that this may happen again, and try to work out the reasons behind it. So far the only constants are I was solo, in the exact same aircraft (VH-KHE), and a reduced fuel level.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 9:16pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Yeah, and don't forget the intangibles.. especially in a lightly-loaded airplane.
It might very well have been calm, but when the difference between the wheels having traction, and not having traction might be 38 as opposed to 41kias..that three knot window can be erased by the slightest of wind gusts.
One thing to think about.. maybe.. would be to change your take-off trim a tad.. when it's just you and not much fuel..
Just thinking out loud.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 9:20pm
Splinter562
Offline
Colonel
Tampa, FL
Gender:
Posts: 217
Could you have been dragging the left break?
Edit:
A tricycle gear aircraft (with the mains behind the C.G.) is stable on the ground. The aircraft's nose should try to align with the direction of motion rather than go away from it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 9:33pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
I'd agree with checking the brakes. Ask whoever works on the aircraft if the left brake looks and functions as it should, also ask about the wheel bearings or anything else that might do that. If you ever see anything on the preflight, or have any questions about anything like that, never, ever hesitate to ask whoever is around, and if nobody is around, don't go. It's not worth getting killed over.
I have almost 200 hours in 172s and I've never had an issue like this, so I would imagine it would be an aircraft issue (no offense, I'm not trying to say I'm better than you, just that in my opinion, it's probably an aircraft issue). I've never noticed that slipstream has never had so pronounced an effect as to pull the nose to the left enough to do what happened to you. I don't really know what else it could be.
One other thing, when you fly, where are your feet on the rudder pedals?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 10:56pm
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
Quote:
One thing to think about.. maybe.. would be to change your take-off trim a tad.. when it's just you and not much fuel..
So trim it down more to apply pressure to the gears?
Quote:
A tricycle gear aircraft (with the mains behind the C.G.) is stable on the ground. The aircraft's nose should try to align with the direction of motion rather than go away from it.
As I understand it would, when the tyres have reasonable traction. The drift seems to occur due to inertia acting on the entire aircraft and the tyres losing traction when I correct.
Quote:
I'd agree with checking the brakes. Ask whoever works on the aircraft if the left brake looks and functions as it should, also ask about the wheel bearings or anything else that might do that. If you ever see anything on the preflight, or have any questions about anything like that, never, ever hesitate to ask whoever is around, and if nobody is around, don't go. It's not worth getting killed over.
I will ask about it, but I don't think so. All of our 172SPs behave in the same way. The yaw left is noticeable when power is applied during takeoff, requiring right rudder to correct. Don't quote me, but I think they have the most powerful engine of any 172 which may explain why it does this.
Quote:
I have almost 200 hours in 172s and I've never had an issue like this, so I would imagine it would be an aircraft issue (no offense, I'm not trying to say I'm better than you, just that in my opinion, it's probably an aircraft issue). I've never noticed that slipstream has never had so pronounced an effect as to pull the nose to the left enough to do what happened to you. I don't really know what else it could be.
No offence taken! I understand you have more hours in this type than me, and welcome any input or ideas.
Quote:
One other thing, when you fly, where are your feet on the rudder pedals?
As low as possible! During my first few hours I made the mistake of leaving my feet on the brakes. Lukily the instructor took control quickly and fixed up the aircrft. As I said, I have made some mistakes but I always learn from them.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 12:53am
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
Hmmm, it's all very odd. I've flown the 180 hp 172 quite a bit as well, so I don't know why they would be any different. As far as trimming goes. I usually try to trim to the so the aircraft will rotate and fly hands-off a little above typical rotation speed (~60 kts, Vx, but check the POH or PIM for your speeds). There should be a mark on the trim indicator that marks where the trim should be at take-off. Other than that, I would just recommend making sure you are on the centerline for the entire take-off roll and if you start to deviate at all, correct it immediately and get flying as soon as possible.
How about this - do you notice a substantial left yaw once you're flying?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 1:14am
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
I always make sure I'm lined up and going straight before applying full power.
There is a mark on the trim for take off position and I trim to it before taking off.
On climb, and any time full power is on, a fair bit of right rudder is needed to correct for the left yaw induced by the slipstream.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 1:33am
RitterKreuz
Offline
Colonel
Texas
Gender:
Posts: 1253
is it possible that your heels were not on the floor and you touched the left brake pedal?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 5:02am
gsamsonite
Offline
Major
Hello!
Posts: 4
Never heard of anyone that's gone off the runway twice.
Parafield gets some pretty serious winds and it sounds like it's just a lack of control .
Another lesson on Effects of Controls is advisable.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 8:56am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
RitterKreuz wrote
on Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 1:33am:
is it possible that your heels were not on the floor and you touched the left brake pedal?
There is that one... forgot about that.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 2:52pm
TSC.
Offline
Colonel
The older I get, the better
I was...
Torquay, Devon, England.
Gender:
Posts: 5132
gsamsonite wrote
on May 1
st
, 2008 at 2:34am:
Wake turbulence??
From a C172??
Are you being serious? That is not even possible Wingo, does anyone ese agree with me here?
I have been flying, instructing at Parafield for over 3 years now and have never seen such an event.
I have landed with 4 other planes on the runway, that were in formation just ahead of me on final, and nothing . . . that is too weird, are you sure it wasn't just you as a pilot??
Bloody oath Clear Out The Skies, what are you going to do when you're coming in behind jets, you might bank more than 50 degrees!
gsamsonite wrote
on Jun 10
th
, 2008 at 8:19am:
Are you serious??????
That is absolutely ridiculous. Are you really a Qantas pilot?
gsamsonite wrote
on Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 5:02am:
Never heard of anyone that's gone off the runway twice.
Parafield gets some pretty serious winds and it sounds like it's just a lack of control .
Another lesson on Effects of Controls is advisable.
Are you as helpful as this with your own students or do you save it all for the internet?
TSC.
'Only two things are infinite.......The Universe and Human stupidity........and I'm not too sure about the Universe' - Einstein
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 5:40pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
He discredited himself with that first post.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Jun 11
th
, 2008 at 11:21pm
Splinter562
Offline
Colonel
Tampa, FL
Gender:
Posts: 217
gsamsonite wrote
on May 1
st
, 2008 at 2:34am:
I have landed with 4 other planes on the runway, that were in formation just ahead of me on final, and nothing . . . that is too weird, are you sure it wasn't just you as a pilot??
Off topic, but I have done formation landings in Cessna 152s. One time, I made the mistake of being on the downwind side of lead with a slight crosswind. Even that little bitty airplane makes noticeable wake turbulence. It's about the same as having some low level turbulence on a gusty day. Nothing that the aircraft can't handle, but could be a problem if careful attention isn't paid to directional control.
If there wasn't a crosswind that day, then my guess is still the left brake, but could be wake turbulence if the winds were just right and you were right after something like a larger twin. I don't think it's the p-factor. Unless you really let it go, you usually don't run into takeoff controllability problems until you get into high-performance aircraft or taildraggers.
The only time I've ever had an aircraft try to wander off towards the side of the runway was in a V-tail Bonanza. I accidentally left the yaw damper on when landing in a crosswind. The airplane was trying to put in a bit of left rudder after touch down which I had to immediately correct for with pressure on the right pedal. Again, something that could have been an issue without careful attention to directional control.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 12:00am
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
I wasn't going to say anything, but seeing how TSC. has brought it up.
Do you have something against me gsamsonite? Your profile says you have made three posts, and as far as I see all three have been made against me. I say against me due to the fact that, unlike some people such as Brett and Rotty, your posts seem to have no constructive advise or value. I agree with TSC.'s comment, are you like this with all of your students? You seem to expect people to intuitively know how to fly an aircraft, and not make a single mistake or fault. Tell me, are you so perfect that when you were learning to fly you made every take off perfect, every circuit perfect and every landing perfect? If you say "Yes" then I say you are a liar.
Maybe you are afraid of admitting your own mistakes? May you be one of the cowboy pilots who thinks they are impenetrable and flawless? The reasons I post what I do is because I know when I make a mistake, and I want to fix it so I don't make the same mistake twice. As others have said, my instructor is my primary source but I would also like to gather other opinions, another viewpoint on my errors. I am in training to be a Qantas pilot, I currently have 70 hours and just got my PPL. I by no means expect myself to be perfect yet, I do expect by the time I enter Qantas to be bloody good at what I do but I also expect to still be learning.
Why is it that when ever I do post asking about opinions, you always seem to be right there ready to ridicule? Being an instructor I would think you may have something constructive to say, especially if you have been instructing for three years. Is there any particular reason why you take aim at me? You don't seem to want to have a shot at anyone else who posts with problems. Are you perhaps jealous that I am a Qantas Cadet, and have an oppurtunity that you didn't? I am not by any means saying I am better than you by saying that, nor do I think I am better than anyone else for being a Qantas Cadet. If I did think so, why would I be here admitting my mistakes? I am always first to notice when I do something wrong, because I want to be the best I can be.
Your first post was in reply to my first solo thread. Now being my first solo, how many hours do you think I had? 20 or so? Do you expect me to be perfect, after 20 hours, with the stress of my first solo on top? It does seem so. Yes, I did get low on approach and go through some wake turbulence, and it has been the only time. Guess what? A C172 does produce wake, every wing producing lift creates a wake vortex. It is called induced drag, and happens to increase when the angle of attack increases. If a 172 is on final, with a high angle of attack, with flaps out and producing a large amount of lift then it will produce some significant vortexes. You may have experienced it yourself when doing a steep level turn. Ever done one perfectly, and then felt the bump at the end? That was you going through your own vortex. I thought that would be basic knowledge for an instructor.
Your second and third posts were in this thread. I can't say much about the first one other than what I said earlier. I will add one thing though, do you find "Are you serious?????? That is absolutely ridiculous. Are you really a Qantas pilot?" a suitable reply, especially when compared to other posts that followed by helpful members? Your next post is equally ridiculous. I didn't realise every single pilot in the world goes off the runway only once, thanks for sharing that information. Secondly I have only run off the runway ONCE. That was the first time I experienced this effect. I posted about it and recieved some very helpful replies and when I experienced the same effect again the other day I was able to react suitably and move into ground effect for greater control before climbing out. See what I did there? I learnt from a mistake so it wouldn't happen again! What I want to know is what produces the effect described, because it is an odd effect that isn't covered in day to day lessons. I don't need an effects of control lesson, I understand fully what each control does. At the moment, it seems the cause is the aircraft is light enough to slightly lift earlier than I am used to with an instructor on board.
I ask kindly that you no longer reply to my threads, unless you have something constructive or helpful to add.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 2:05am
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
I decided to clear things up and draw what happened as best as I could and condense all the information I can give.
The initial pull to the LEFT is NORMAL, it always happens and except for these two times I have always been able to correct without a hitch.
What happens after isn't normal. I apply RIGHT rudder, the nose yaws RIGHT but inertia (that's my thought at least) takes the aircraft on its original course to the left. The tyres lose traction and you can hear ALL tyres squealing/scraping. It is this action that caused the run off the runway the first time, due to the tyres no longer providing directional control. Second time it happened as soon as I heard the tyres squeal I lifted off.
(Caps are just for highlighting)
The constants are:
1. The exact same aircraft (VH-KHE)
2. Solo
3. Reduced fuel level
4. Aircraft TOW around 950kg or about 2090lb
First time:
1. Above constants
2. Touch and Go
3. Average wind from the LEFT
4. Flap still retracting (i.e. partially out)
Second time:
1. Above constants
2. Takeoff roll started from a standing position
3. Light and variable wind. Wind sock limp, but aligned with runway.
4. No flaps
A thought has just occured to me. These are the only two times that the above constants have been met! Every other time I have gone solo I have always had full fuel, been doing a training area solo and only landed and taxiied off with no other takeoffs. I have done three solo navs now as well, but the first one I didn't land anywhere and the second I did a touch and go with relatively higher fuel levels. i.e. These are the only two times I have taken off solo with a reduced fuel level.
That is all the info I can think of giving. If there is anything else please ask.
I will add that I am very conscious of ensuring my feet are well on the floor away from the brakes and ensure the aircraft is travelling down the centreline, with the nose straight, before applying full power.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 5:01am
gsamsonite
Offline
Major
Hello!
Posts: 4
TSC - not talking to you. The way I manage my students is none of your business and I'll have you know all of them have gone on to bigger and better things.
Brett Henderson - No discredit there. I was stating the facts.
Splinter562 - I was talking about a. 152s and b. landing behind them, obviously with a low power setting.
And Wingo - I don't have anything against you personally... It's just I have students that would give my right arm, for a place in your course, and could very possibly be there on more merit.
If you have a problem, ask a real pilot - not others on here.
You're all hacks! I'm out.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 7:14am
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Freudian slip ?
Quote:
It's just I have students that would give
my
right arm, for a place in your course
I know he should be ignored, but I coudn't resist
Back to business..
OK.. Slip-stream and/or P-factor aren't corrected for, as much as they're anticipated. Even flying the sim, I'll catch myself applying right pedal AS I'm applying power. And when I fly more powerful, single-engine aircraft for real (like a C182, Piper Saratoga, or a Mooney), Ill subconsiously start the takeoff roll already pointing slightly to the right. I flew a C207 once, where the 300hp would have you applying FULL right rudder when applying takeoff power.. kinda like full aileron deflection for even a slight crosswind.. and then let it out as needed.
Again, in time.. these are things that you won't even think about. Your feet will do what's needed, during each, unique takeoff.
Now, just a question.. It might have something to do with airline training (getting you used to flap use ALL the time).. the only time I'll have any flaps deployed during takeoff, is when I'm genuinely concerned about clearing an obstacle. A C172 with reduced fuel; and only a 150lb pilot on-board (not gonna do the metric conversion), will get light on the wheels in a hurry, with flaps out.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 9:36am
TSC.
Offline
Colonel
The older I get, the better
I was...
Torquay, Devon, England.
Gender:
Posts: 5132
gsamsonite wrote
on Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 5:01am:
If you have a problem, ask a real pilot - not others on here.
You are a real pilot, you were asked, & yet you still had no answers - just put downs.
Wingo was simply asking for advice, not a kick in the nuts.
TSC.
'Only two things are infinite.......The Universe and Human stupidity........and I'm not too sure about the Universe' - Einstein
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 5:29pm
Mobius
Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin
Posts: 4369
gsamsonite wrote
on Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 5:01am:
The way I manage my students is none of your business and I'll have you know all of them have gone on to bigger and better things.
Scary.
Wingo, if you don't mind me asking, do you know what your total weight was on that take-off or both take-offs? If I remember right, you're not a huge person (no offense, I just mean you don't weight 400 lbs or anything
). I've actually heard of people who have had troubles with control when they're flying solo in a lightly loaded aircraft and they've had to throw a cinderblock or two in the luggage compartment to balance things out.
Something else that I just though of: In the 172, the nosewheel steering is a weight-on-wheels activated system, so if you had rotated or had enough speed that there wasn't enough weight on the nosewheel for the nosewheel steering to be active and there might not have been enough airflow over the rudder to make it useful, or even deflecting it too much could have stalled it (I'm not too sure about that one though).
Like Brett said, I would suggest lining up pointed a few degrees to the right and just be ready for it to start to go.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 6:09pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
I'm still thinking that a light pilot, alone in a C172, with less than 1/2 tanks
WITH
10 degrees of flaps, might find the tires useless at airspeed as low as 30knots.
**being that I weigh all of 225, and rarely fly alone (and rarely use flaps for takeoff).. I'm kinda clueless..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 7:38pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Brett_Henderson wrote
on Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 6:09pm:
I'm still thinking that a light pilot, alone in a C172, with less than 1/2 tanks
WITH
10 degrees of flaps, might find the tires useless at airspeed as low as 30knots.
**being that I weigh all of 225, and rarely fly alone (and rarely use flaps for takeoff).. I'm kinda clueless..
'Tis true... the tires help somewhat, especially when landing and rolling out, but they're not really made to resist the various effects that can cause drift on the runway. that's why aileron and rudder input should be there from the beginning of the takeoff roll.
BTW... just a little nit-picking: "Traction" refers to
powered
wheels ("the transference of mechanical force through friction" or whatever the definition is).
Friction
is all a free-wheeling airplane tire can provide. And not much, at that.
Not assuming anyone here thinks Cessna wheels are powered; just a little observation.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 8:30pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
Excellent observation.. Aviation is one place where getting a little loose with terminology can pile up into a bunch of mis-communication..
Rotty, you're not a 200-pounder.. Can a C172 get frictionless at 30kias with just you, low fuel and 10 degrees of flaps ?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Jun 13
th
, 2008 at 12:38am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Brett_Henderson wrote
on Jun 12
th
, 2008 at 8:30pm:
Excellent observation.. Aviation is one place where getting a little loose with terminology can pile up into a bunch of mis-communication..
Rotty, you're not a 200-pounder.. Can a C172 get frictionless at 30kias with just you, low fuel and 10 degrees of flaps ?
Depends. Runway surface (water, ice, gooey asphalt, lots of polished rubber from numerous landings), tire condition... etc. It's never happened to me on takeoff that I can recall, and every time I've landed crooked I wished there was
less
friction.
, so I can't confirm or deny the possibility.
But once I did taxi a 172 on an icy, narrow taxiway with just me and about 15 gallons of fuel aboard, and it was a pretty close shave. One of the few times in a plane where I've said aloud: "This was a bad idea..."
I've made a few zig-zag takeoffs due to bad footwork, and crow-hopped due to improper aileron input, etc... but I've never really felt I was drifting while still in contact with the runway.
It's hard to tell, though, sometimes... that's why I try to roll on the runway as if the tires were greasy. Just in case. If you count on the tires too much, you may be disappointed.
They may also grab too much sometimes- I've heard of more than one instance of a 172 or similar coming to grief because the (probably under-inflated) tire came off the rim due to side-loading!
Most of the time, the "trike" arrangement does what it should (keeps the plane more or less straight in response to yawing while on the runway), but if it's wet or icy, or you're on grass or dirt, you need to be ready with rudder and aileron. It's best to forget what you think you can expect from the wheels and just fly it until you can brake.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #30 -
Jun 13
th
, 2008 at 11:58pm
Wingo
Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.
Gender:
Posts: 1322
Quote:
Now, just a question.. It might have something to do with airline training (getting you used to flap use ALL the time).. the only time I'll have any flaps deployed during takeoff, is when I'm genuinely concerned about clearing an obstacle. A C172 with reduced fuel; and only a 150lb pilot on-board (not gonna do the metric conversion), will get light on the wheels in a hurry, with flaps out.
I don't take off with flaps extended, only when doing short fields. The first time this happened I was performing a touch and go. The flap selector was on 0 but the flaps were still retracting when I applied power. The second time was 0 flaps from a full stop.
I would say you are right in saying I should be anticipating rather than correcting, which would avoid this effect even beginning.
Quote:
Wingo, if you don't mind me asking, do you know what your total weight was on that take-off or both take-offs? If I remember right, you're not a huge person (no offense, I just mean you don't weight 400 lbs or anything Wink). I've actually heard of people who have had troubles with control when they're flying solo in a lightly loaded aircraft and they've had to throw a cinderblock or two in the luggage compartment to balance things out.
I can't say for sure, but on both it would have been very close to 950kg or 2090lbs, with myself at 60kg or around 130lbs.
Quote:
BTW... just a little nit-picking: "Traction" refers to powered wheels ("the transference of mechanical force through friction" or whatever the definition is). Friction is all a free-wheeling airplane tire can provide. And not much, at that. Grin
Not assuming anyone here thinks Cessna wheels are powered; just a little observation.
I will keep that one in mind! I didn't realise that there was a difference
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School ««
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.