Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Specific Aircraft Types
› Which is better?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Poll
Question:
Which is better Spitfire Or P-51 Mustang?
*** This poll has now closed ***
Spitfire
17 (44.7%)
P-51 mustang
21 (55.3%)
Total votes: 38
« Created by:
p-51mustangfanatic
on: Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 12:43pm »
Pages:
1
Which is better? (Read 8946 times)
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 12:43pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
I have always had a particular debate with my friend about which aircraft is better and he always say's that the Spitfire is better and i say the Mustang is but we can never reach an agreement!
So i ask you the question and i would like to find out peoples opinion!
Thanks
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 1:16pm
Groundbound1
Offline
Colonel
No, I don't work for Mythbusters...
Michigan, USA
Gender:
Posts: 1745
It probably depends on which side of the pond you live, but without taking any historical facts into account, and basing my choice solely on looks, I have to say the Mustang (P-51D) all the way. It's been my favorite since I was little.
Specs: Asus Crosshair nForce 590 SLI,
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ w/ZeroTherm BTF90,
4GB G.Skill PI Series DDR2-800,
Sapphire HD4870 512MB,
PC P&C 750 Quad, in a CoolerMaster HAF932
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 1:20pm
CD.
Ex Member
Ask Ozzy72 that question ...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 1:34pm
Groundbound1
Offline
Colonel
No, I don't work for Mythbusters...
Michigan, USA
Gender:
Posts: 1745
Quote:
Ask Ozzy72 that question ...
LOL
Specs: Asus Crosshair nForce 590 SLI,
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ w/ZeroTherm BTF90,
4GB G.Skill PI Series DDR2-800,
Sapphire HD4870 512MB,
PC P&C 750 Quad, in a CoolerMaster HAF932
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 2:33pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
When it really mattered, in 1940, the Spitfire was a much better aeroplane.
Overall the Spit was a little more versatile in its wartime career, particularly considering the basic design was over 3 years old when war broke out in 1939.
The 'Stang certainly was revolutionary though, and a battle winner once they'd put a Merlin in the front.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 2:39pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Groundbound1 wrote
on Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 1:16pm:
and basing my choice solely on looks, I have to say the Mustang
Should've gone to specsavers... Mind you, there are
a couple
of curves on the Mustang...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Mar 31
st
, 2008 at 3:20pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
Thanks everyone for voting!!
hopefully more votes will be recieved, the vote will end in 2 weeks and ill see the overall result then, so get everyone you know to vote!!
«
Last Edit: Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 12:30pm by p-51mustangfanatic
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 4:01am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
I have to commit treason here, and say that the looks of the Mustang does it for me.
Quote:
Ask Ozzy72 that question ...
Problem is, once he sees this thread, being a MOD and having access to the results as they come in, well I would not like to point the finger, but he is known for having a
small liking
huge fetish for the Spitfire............now if Ozzy and Max Mosley got together, that would be quite a party
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 5:50am
the invisibal man
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
if you cant see me you
dont know whats coming
bournemouth
Gender:
Posts: 7
well as im his buddy you all know what i voted for but i think its realy hard to chose which is better we were thinking of doing a battal on a combat simulater between them
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 5:52am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
I am of course biased and will always say a Spit. The Spit was developed into far more roles than the Mustang and apart from a shared engine (Packard Merlin) they were VERY different. The Spitfire was developed as a short-range interceptor/fighter whereas the Mustang was a long-range bomber protector.
Having spoken to a former Eagle Squadron pilot who flew Spits for the Brits and then Mustangs for the 8th USAAF he said the Spitfire was always at one with you like wearing a comfortable piece of clothing, however the Mustang could go the distance.
However recce Spits had ranges that amazed, even though they weren't designed for it, they also went into ground-attack, fighter-bomber, transport (mail and beer mostly although sometimes lots of bottles of champagne or wine) etc. A remarkably versatile aircraft considering its original design brief.
So for me it is Spitfires
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 9:04am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
the invisibal man wrote
on Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 5:50am:
well as im his buddy you all know what i voted for but i think its realy hard to chose which is better we were thinking of doing a battal on a combat simulater between them
HA HA me and my friend try but it never works!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 9:31am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Depends what you mean by better. Better looks, better performance, whatever. This will mainly be influenced by the side of the Atlantic you happen to have been born on. It's not possible to judge on performance as they were designed for different jobs. Personally, I think that the Spitfire is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever built. Many people say that the P-51D was the best all-round fighter produced by any country during WWII.
p-51mustangfanatic wrote
on Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 9:04am:
the invisibal man wrote
on Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 5:50am:
well as im his buddy you all know what i voted for but i think its realy hard to chose which is better we were thinking of doing a battal on a combat simulater between them
HA HA me and my friend try but it never works!
A lot would depend on the mark of Spitfire. There are far more types of Spit than Mustang.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 4:08pm
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
I voted spitfire, soley on the looks, because there both designed for different tasks , as has been made clear.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 7:01pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 4:08pm:
I voted spitfire, soley on the looks, because there both designed for different tasks , as has been made clear.
Initially they were both designed for the same task. It has to be remembered the the original P51 specification came from an RAF requirement for a fighter type to supplement the Spitfires and Hurricanes which were the main assets of Fighter Command at the time. What they actually asked for IIRC was a NA built P40 to bolster the numbers of UK built aircraft; NA then came back and said they could design a better aircraft in the same timescale.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 8:41pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
They served very different roles... it's an unfair contest.
But assuming you mean "which is better in a one-on-one scrap with, say, a Me109", I'd have to say they each could hold their own.
as for which would prevail in a Spit-vs-Mustang shootout, I'd guess the pilot who knew his plane best would win.
If I had the money for only one of them, it'd be a very tough call... but I'd most likely choose a Hurricane.
If I had the money for both, I'd get a P-38.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 8:47pm
a1
Offline
Colonel
Tied In A Knot I Am
Gender:
Posts: 8217
The P-51 was ment to replace the Spitfire so if you look at that only info the P-51 would be better. But yes I would prefer a P-38 over those two. P-38s are faster and have more firepower.
790i : QX9650 : 4Gb DDR3 : GeForce 8800 GTX : 1 WD Raptor : 1 WD VelociRaptor 150
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 6:46am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
a1 wrote
on Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 8:47pm:
The P-51 was ment to replace the Spitfire
It was meant to do no such thing. As my previous post said, it came out of an RAF wish to acquire licence built P-40s to supplement British aircraft (remembering that in 1940 British aircraft production was at full capacity).
The Spitfire was continually developed as required - remember at the time of the P-51's genesis the MkII Spit was the latest; and they went up to the Mk22 postwar...
If anything the Hurricane would be more in need of replacing - and the last of those left the production line in 1944!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 8:03am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
C wrote
on Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 6:46am:
a1 wrote
on Apr 1
st
, 2008 at 8:47pm:
The P-51 was ment to replace the Spitfire
It was meant to do no such thing. As my previous post said, it came out of an RAF wish to acquire licence built P-40s to supplement British aircraft (remembering that in 1940 British aircraft production was at full capacity).
The Spitfire was continually developed as required - remember at the time of the P-51's genesis the MkII Spit was the latest; and they went up to the Mk22 postwar...
If anything the Hurricane would be more in need of replacing - and the last of those left the production line in 1944!
The problem i find with the soit is that they hd soo many differnet varients that it is as if they couldn't get it right and had to keep changing it! were as the mustang it was develped from being the A type to the H type (with other wierd varients)
Overall to me the mustang is better due to secifications such as speed manueverbility and g loads also visibilty was better and the undercarrage was far better due to it being wide track!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 12:42pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
p-51mustangfanatic wrote
on Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 8:03am:
The problem i find with the soit is that they hd soo many differnet varients that it is as if they couldn't get it right and had to keep changing it! were as the mustang it was develped from being the A type to the H type (with other wierd varients
The Spitfire evolved along with the continued development RR Merlin (you needed quite a different airframe to hold a 1600hp Merlin, when the basic Merlin at the start of the war developed 1030hp!), and then the Griffon (major airframe changes due to a huge leap in power and a major change in balance due to the size of the engine), not because of the design "not being right". Most of the major Mk changes were due to new engines being available (I & II to V; V to IX; IX to XII then XIV; XIV to 21 and 22).
By the time the RR/Packard Merlin made it into the P51 (remembering at the time, with reference to your point below about visibility, the Mustang was the high backed B/C), the Spit was already almost at its definitive Mk with the Merlin (Mk IX). You also make the point above that the Mustang itself had several variations - with the H model being quite a lot different to the poorly-engine P51A
Quote:
Overall to me the mustang is better due to secifications such as speed manueverbility and g loads also visibilty was better and the undercarrage was far better due to it being wide track!
Yep, the wide track undercarriage is a nicety and certainly an advantage the RAF knew about. When the pressure of war was over, and Vickers-Supermarine developed the Spiteful, one of the main changes was a switch the a wide track u/c unit.
The Spit had a bubble canopy too, with the the Mk XVI (development of the IX), the XIV and all subsequent variants bar the XIX and 21.
The Spit also had a useful naval career too (as the Seafire). Another example of its versatility.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 2:30pm
machineman9
Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England
Gender:
Posts: 5255
I think the Mustang has the edge in looks, but the Spitfire is much more of a classic.
Mustfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 3:34pm
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Ah, the eternal debate. How many times have we had this discussion then?
I happen to like the Mustang. If you needed a plane to take you all the way to Berlin, have a scrap with a bunch of Fw190s and then shoot up a few trains on the way home just for good measure, the Mustang was your plane. However if we’re talking best US Warbird, P-47 every time. Didn’t have the range of the Mustang but had the speed and better firepower and could take a good kicking and get you home in one piece. One rifle bullet in the Mustang’s radiator and it was hello POW
. But the P-47 could keep flying with a cylinder shot out
.
But back on topic, Spitfire of course, no contest
.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 3:51pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
machineman9 wrote
on Apr 2
nd
, 2008 at 2:30pm:
I think the Mustang has the edge in looks,
Specsavers....
I think Ozzy has some work to do...
Quote:
But the P-47 could keep flying with a cylinder shot out
And could outrun anything in a dive. Shows what you can do if you have a 20ton lead engine on the front!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 6:36am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
Id like to ongratulate C on his fantastic field of kowledge o the spitfire!!
Well done
I have loads of info on the mustang and would love to have a face to face debate with you lol!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 12:01pm
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky
.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 2:14pm
the invisibal man
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
if you cant see me you
dont know whats coming
bournemouth
Gender:
Posts: 7
i know this is nothing to do with topic but do you need to pay to use the fourm
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 3:08pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 12:01pm:
Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky
.
Me109 doesn't, and never did exist...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 5:17pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
C wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 3:08pm:
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 12:01pm:
Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky
.
Me109 doesn't, and never did exist...
well Messerschmit Bf-109 also called the ME 109
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 6:17pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
p-51mustangfanatic wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 5:17pm:
C wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 3:08pm:
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 12:01pm:
Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky
.
Me109 doesn't, and never did exist...
well Messerschmit Bf-109 also called the ME 109
I was being pedantic...
Bf/ Me designations is one of my favourite subjects for inane pedantry. Mind you, I can never remember with which Messerschmitt it changed (although it was 15something or 16something) from Bf to Me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Apr 4
th
, 2008 at 6:40am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
C wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 6:17pm:
p-51mustangfanatic wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 5:17pm:
C wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 3:08pm:
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 3
rd
, 2008 at 12:01pm:
Hehe, interesting topic, offcourse, we all know that a ME-109 would blow both of em right out of the sky
.
Me109 doesn't, and never did exist...
well Messerschmit Bf-109 also called the ME 109
I was being pedantic...
Bf/ Me designations is one of my favourite subjects for inane pedantry. Mind you, I can never remember with which Messerschmitt it changed (although it was 15something or 16something) from Bf to Me.
He he!
Dosen't matter we both know that the Bf-109 could most definatley be absolutley obliterated by either the spitfire or the mustang!!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 9:11am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
LOL! judging by the rsult no one can decide on which is better!!!!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #30 -
Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 10:09am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
As i said, the ME/BF-109 would beat em both in looks and flying charteristics
.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 10:56am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 10:09am:
As i said, the ME/BF-109 would beat em both in looks
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... You obviously have odd taste.
Quote:
and flying charteristics
.
Mmm. Shame about the taking off and landing characteristics then. And the fact that as soon as you get anywhere you have to turn around again as you've run out of fuel!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 11:19am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
C wrote
on Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 10:56am:
pepper_airborne wrote
on Apr 27
th
, 2008 at 10:09am:
As i said, the ME/BF-109 would beat em both in looks
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... You obviously have odd taste.
Quote:
and flying charteristics
.
Mmm. Shame about the taking off and landing characteristics then. And the fact that as soon as you get anywhere you have to turn around again as you've run out of fuel!
Shhh, just throwingsome feul on the fire
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Apr 29
th
, 2008 at 9:41am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
Im guessing that this poll will never end! as there is never a clear winner!
O well my debate will live on!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Apr 29
th
, 2008 at 12:10pm
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
p-51mustangfanatic wrote
on Apr 29
th
, 2008 at 9:41am:
Im guessing that this poll will never end! as there is never a clear winner!
O well my debate will live on!
A 50/50 answer, maybe Mods are putting this thread to bed with a nice even outcome
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Apr 30
th
, 2008 at 2:48pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
expat wrote
on Apr 29
th
, 2008 at 12:10pm:
p-51mustangfanatic wrote
on Apr 29
th
, 2008 at 9:41am:
Im guessing that this poll will never end! as there is never a clear winner!
O well my debate will live on!
A 50/50 answer, maybe Mods are putting this thread to bed with a nice even outcome
Matt
it is a possiblity!!! lol i dunno
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
May 19
th
, 2008 at 8:48pm
specter177
Offline
Colonel
Check out the Maverick
Flying Car!
I-TEC - X35
Gender:
Posts: 1406
They can now! I picked the Mustang, but I'm slightly biased, since my grandfather owns one and I've flown in it before. Plus, it looks better.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
May 21
st
, 2008 at 3:26am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
specter177 wrote
on May 19
th
, 2008 at 8:48pm:
They can now! I picked the Mustang, but I'm slightly biased, since my grandfather owns one and I've flown in it before. Plus, it looks better.
blasphemy! Get the pitch forks!
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
May 21
st
, 2008 at 10:26pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
Sorry guys, I love the Stang too!
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
May 22
nd
, 2008 at 12:36pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
DaveSims wrote
on May 21
st
, 2008 at 10:26pm:
Sorry guys, I love the Stang too!
But don't we all!!!!
i adour the mustang!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
May 25
th
, 2008 at 4:53pm
Anxyous
Offline
Colonel
I can has cheezburger?
Posts: 2670
"If it looks right, it probably is".
Mustang FTW!
I was lucky to see one lyin at an airshow last year... Sound is unmatched... Except by the Spitfire and the Lancaster... But that's the only thing they have in common
&&
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
May 26
th
, 2008 at 4:53pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
Ok the result is pretty clear!!
Well done all voters!
but the P-51 mustang is the winner!
cheers guys
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Aug 22
nd
, 2008 at 1:06pm
mustang51
Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Posts: 32
I think it's a 50/50 deal. P-51D and the MK XIV Spit that is. If I had the money I don't know which one I would choose. Need to have five I guess, P-51D, MK XIV, F8F, F4U-4, and the best looking Brit fighter, the Hawker Sea Fury. Not too much to ask for......is it??
Bob
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Aug 22
nd
, 2008 at 1:15pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
mustang51 wrote
on Aug 22
nd
, 2008 at 1:06pm:
I think it's a 50/50 deal. P-51D and the MK XIV Spit that is. If I had the money I don't know which one I would choose. Need to have five I guess, P-51D, MK XIV, F8F, F4U-4, and the best looking Brit fighter, the Hawker Sea Fury. Not too much to ask for......is it??
Bob
Peter Teichman has the money & did just that, well almost.
http://www.hangar11.co.uk/
If you really want to know which is best he would be the man to ask.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Aug 22
nd
, 2008 at 3:28pm
mustang51
Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Posts: 32
Was looking through a Mustang website the other day. A history of surviving Mustangs. One listed, still flying today, Petie II I think, it was bought in 1957 as surplus for $755.00. I was making that kind of money then!!!
Bob
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #45 -
Aug 23
rd
, 2008 at 1:45am
Vodka Burner
Ex Member
F4U-4 was better than both.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #46 -
Aug 23
rd
, 2008 at 4:58pm
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
mustang51 wrote
on Aug 22
nd
, 2008 at 3:28pm:
Was looking through a Mustang website the other day. A history of surviving Mustangs. One listed, still flying today, Petie II I think, it was bought in 1957 as surplus for $755.00. I was making that kind of money then!!!
Bob
I know i always thought if i were back then i would have a few rite now!!!
i love your choose in aircraft i so would have a hawker sea fury a mustang and a spit in my collection! then a bearcat!
one day when i win the lottery lol! (like 100 times!)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #47 -
Aug 24
th
, 2008 at 1:17pm
masmith
Offline
Colonel
Bristol/Liverpool uk
Gender:
Posts: 1267
Quote:
I think the Mustang has the edge in looks
Please go away
Spitfre hands down thats all marks MkI, MkII, MkV, PRIV/VI/VII, MkVI, MkVII, MkVIII, MkIX, MkX/XI, MkXII (Even with the griffin), MkXIV, MkXVI, MkXVIII, PRXIX, Mk21, Mk22, Mk24.
And even the Seafires
In my mind it was the Hurricane and the Spitfire along with all the Royal Air Force (and the foreign pilots US included) that decide the out come of WW2 it was not the US, in 1940 if the RAF didn't not put up such a resilient fight against the Luftwaffe Great Britain would of been invaded and therefore in 1941 when the US did eventually join the war there would not of been an appropriate base to launch the invasion of Europe. Which inevitably brought the war to an end and gave millions of people in Nazi Germany and the surrounding countries there freedom (some not until the 1990's)Though that's one big mistake I believe we made.
I mean yes the Mustang was a fantastic Aircraft and out performs the Spitfire in many ways, but its presence just feels hollow. Were as the Spitfire there is just and endless joy seeing one fly, a feeling that sort of evadeds description.
«
Last Edit: Aug 24
th
, 2008 at 3:45pm by masmith
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #48 -
Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 5:45pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
masmith wrote
on Aug 24
th
, 2008 at 1:17pm:
Quote:
I think the Mustang has the edge in looks
Please go away
Must be one of those American fellows!
One thing you can say about both the Mustang and Spitfire - they started well and got uglier!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #49 -
Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 6:08pm
Mictheslik
Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England
Gender:
Posts: 6011
Disregarding all technical and operational statistics for each aircraft, if someone asked me whether I would like to go up in a 2 seater spitfire or a 2 seater mustang it would always be the spitfire. That may be because I'm English, or it may be because of the iconic image produced by Mitchell all those years ago which has become an everlasting symbol of British resilience, but either way I would still go for the spitfire. No other aircraft in existence can conjure up the same sense of engineering achievement and excellence of a Spitfire, certainly amongst the British population. My second point is the sheer beauty of the machine. Although sounding almost identical, when a spitfire roars overhead one is blown away by the sheer elegance of those gloriously curved wings and it's aerodynamic prowess. No doubt was the mustang a very important and well performing aircraft throughout its operational use, but in my mind, the sight of a mustang, although spectacular, will always be usurped by the fantastic silhouette of the supermarine fighter.......
I think you can guess what I voted for.....
.mic
[center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #50 -
Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 6:15pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Err, it says at the top
*** This poll has now closed ***
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #51 -
Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 6:47pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Hagar wrote
on Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 6:15pm:
Err, it says at the top
*** This poll has now closed ***
The joys of discussion fora...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #52 -
Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 7:14pm
masmith
Offline
Colonel
Bristol/Liverpool uk
Gender:
Posts: 1267
Quote:
I mean yes the Mustang was a fantastic Aircraft and out performs the Spitfire in many ways, but its presence just feels hollow. Were as the Spitfire there is just and endless joy seeing one fly, a feeling that sort of evadeds description.
Quote:
No doubt was the mustang a very important and well performing aircraft throughout its operational use, but in my mind, the sight of a mustang, although spectacular, will always be usurped by the fantastic silhouette of the supermarine fighter.......
I think you can guess what I voted for.....
.mic
Yep right down the same lines as me Mic.
I completely agree, in fact you have probably said it better
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #53 -
Aug 26
th
, 2008 at 4:32am
Mictheslik
Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England
Gender:
Posts: 6011
C wrote
on Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 6:47pm:
Hagar wrote
on Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 6:15pm:
Err, it says at the top
*** This poll has now closed ***
The joys of discussion fora...
Ah, but I voted ages ago and waited to post the comment
Quote:
Your vote was on: Mar 31st, 2008, 11:57pm
Your vote choice was: Spitfire
.mic
[center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #54 -
Aug 26
th
, 2008 at 11:47am
p-51mustangfanatic
Offline
Colonel
I love to fly and to sim
England
Gender:
Posts: 324
By popular demand i think the mustang won! or i know i for a fact!
maybe we should re open the poll and see the result afterwards??
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #55 -
Aug 31
st
, 2008 at 8:56am
machineman9
Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England
Gender:
Posts: 5255
C wrote
on Aug 25
th
, 2008 at 5:45pm:
masmith wrote
on Aug 24
th
, 2008 at 1:17pm:
Quote:
I think the Mustang has the edge in looks
Please go away
Must be one of those American fellows!
Yep, an American fellow that was born in the south of England and currently lives in the North West
I still stand by what I said... the Spitfire looks more 'stuck together'... the P51 has wings which actually look like they were designed to go with the fueslage instead of a large hole drilled through and bits attached.
I do think the P51 has a bit of a large belly, and the canopy is a bit big itself, but it does look like it was designed and built properly.
I would still rather fly in a Spitfire though, for the same reason as above... I am British.
Just because it was made in my country, doesn't mean it is great (Though Aston Martins and Triumph Daytonas are really, really nice!)
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types ««
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.