Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Beginner DSLR (Read 444 times)
Mar 20th, 2008 at 2:40pm

lintonam   Offline
Colonel
7 Time State Marching
Champions
Cumberland WI

Gender: male
Posts: 94
*****
 
I am looking at buying a DSLR camera and am on a $600 budget. I'm trying to decide between:

D40 SLR Digital Camera Kit with 18-55mm Lens $499.95

Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 10.2 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera with Sony Zoom DT 18-70mm f3.5-5.6 Lens $499.95

Canon 400D $589.95

OlympusEvolt E-410, 10.0 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera Kit with Olympus 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 Zuiko Digital Lens, and Olympus 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 Zuiko Digital Lens  $549.95

Is the E-410 a better deal with 2-lenses or will I be better of with the Sony and only the one lens, since the a-100 has IS?

 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 3:28pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
It all depends on what you're shooting. If it's airplanes, kit lenses will get you nowhere, unless you're right at the runway. Be forewarned though, for $590, the Canon 400D will be body only (without a lens), unless you stumbled upon a fantastic deal.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 3:36pm

Theis   Offline
Colonel
Always somewhere, sometime..
Rødovre, Denmark

Gender: male
Posts: 6116
*****
 
My Olympus E-500 with the 14-45mm lens and 40-150mm lens is a good beginner DSLR..
I think the Olympus is the best choice, because you get two lenses, plus the interface is more userfriendly, and Olympus is generally a more beginnerfriendly DSLR camera, IMO..

A happy Olympus DSLR owner for almost two years now Cool

Cheers Theis
 

... Bar by Mees
...
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 3:44pm

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
Posts: 6011
*****
 
Just remember to keep a bit of money behind for the lens.....the body is nowhere near as important as the glass in front of it.

Also I'd advise looking around for second hand bodies....often much cheaper and not really that much different to a new one Wink

.mic
 

[center]...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 3:53pm
Sierra Romeo Hotel   Ex Member

 
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 3:58pm

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
Posts: 6011
*****
 
Quote:
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III


Grin Grin

.mic
 

[center]...
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 4:09pm

BAW0343   Offline
Colonel
No, now go away or I shall
taunt you a second time
Mesa, AZ

Gender: male
Posts: 3294
*****
 
Quote:
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III



I'll take one  Grin
 

... ...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 4:47pm

evanatorx   Offline
Colonel
Bunny!
Living in Beijing for summer!

Gender: male
Posts: 511
*****
 
Speaking of which, I once saw a man shooting aircraft with medium format mamiya!  Shocked Shocked Shocked Tongue
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 5:06pm

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
All dSLR's in that price range are good nowadays. Just try and feel them at your local store and you'll find out which one suits you best.

Nikon and Canon have the vastest array of lenses available, as Sigma, Tamron and Tokina also build lenses for them. Other brands like Pentax, Sony, Olympus etc aren't always supported by the third party manufactures, although times are changing.

Sony is storming the market at the moment, with lots of new camera's and lenses. Keep your eye on them.

Try to make up your mind on what you'll be shooting, as once you choose a system, you'll have to stick with it and lenses differ in prices from one brand to the other. Do some research on what's available and in what pricerange.

Some links to get you to some reading material:

Camera's and some lenses: www.dpreview.com , http://www.cameralabs.com

Lenses: www.photozone.de ( in english) , www.fredmiranda.com


btw: I own a Canon 400D and use a Canon EF 70-300 IS lense for aviation photography. And I'm very happy with it.  Wink
 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 5:19pm

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
Quote:
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III


At my Belgian digital photography forum a guy bought this camera + several L lenses... just to do home and vacation photography. How idiot or wealthy can one be?  Grin
 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 5:57pm

The Ruptured Duck   Offline
Colonel
Legally sane since yesterday!
Wichita, KS

Gender: male
Posts: 2614
*****
 
Omag 2.0 wrote on Mar 20th, 2008 at 5:19pm:
Quote:
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III


At my Belgian digital photography forum a guy bought this camera + several L lenses... just to do home and vacation photography. How idiot or wealthy can one be?  Grin

Why not?  If I had enough money, I would totally do it.  I'd have to buy a new computer cus 21mp will produce some massive file sizes.  I'm already out of space on this one
 

"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin&&&&"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only thus will he fully understand the world in which he lives." - Socrates&&&&" Flying is a religion. A religion that asymilates all who get a taste of it." - Me&&&&"Make the most out of yourself, for that is all there is of you"- Ralf Waldo Emerson&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 9:13pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
21mp is useless unless you're planning on having the picture blown up the size of a car.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Mar 20th, 2008 at 11:05pm

The Ruptured Duck   Offline
Colonel
Legally sane since yesterday!
Wichita, KS

Gender: male
Posts: 2614
*****
 
flyboy 28 wrote on Mar 20th, 2008 at 9:13pm:
21mp is useless unless you're planning on having the picture blown up the size of a car.

and there are those kinds...
 

"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin&&&&"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only thus will he fully understand the world in which he lives." - Socrates&&&&" Flying is a religion. A religion that asymilates all who get a taste of it." - Me&&&&"Make the most out of yourself, for that is all there is of you"- Ralf Waldo Emerson&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Mar 21st, 2008 at 5:27am

pepper_airborne   Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands

Posts: 2390
*****
 
flyboy 28 wrote on Mar 20th, 2008 at 9:13pm:
21mp is useless unless you're planning on having the picture blown up the size of a car.


Let alone that a camera that size with all the lenses isnt really something you take along with the kids to the amusement park.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Mar 21st, 2008 at 7:33am
Tweek   Ex Member

 
pepper_airborne wrote on Mar 21st, 2008 at 5:27am:
flyboy 28 wrote on Mar 20th, 2008 at 9:13pm:
21mp is useless unless you're planning on having the picture blown up the size of a car.


Let alone that a camera that size with all the lenses isnt really something you take along with the kids to the amusement park.


I don't know why you'd need more than one lens to take to an amusement park! Plus, the 1Ds isn't exactly a huge camera. It'd still be very manageable on a day out.

But still, it's pointless having such a camera unless you're a professional. Or indeed if you like printing your photos at the size of a car...
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print