Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Sim Jet Training: Introduction (Read 186 times)
Reply #15 - Jan 2nd, 2008 at 8:27pm

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
Quote:
Brett: once you get the details of shared-cockpit checkrides, I'd like to be able to do the same for the ATP license and jet checkouts.


Absoulutely  Smiley   I've done quite a few shared cockpit, checkrides.... even helped a real pilot prep for his real instrument checkride. It's an incredible tool.. and gobs of fun..
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Jan 3rd, 2008 at 1:40pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
beaky wrote on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 7:15pm:
Charlie wrote on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 5:38pm:
To be fair, a lot of people go straight onto jets via nothing bigger than a Piper Seneca/Seminole and a simulator type rating. In my experience the biggest I'd flown before the Funbus was only a standard B200 King Air. Smiley


That surprises me, that pilots would go from pistons to jets without some time in a King Air or similar... but I guess if you get the airline-quality sim training it's not so big a leap.


I find it a little surprising too, but then again, I suppose it all boils down to money. If you can do an IR in a piston Seneca or Seminole for example, then the school aren't going to have anything like a King Air in their fleet if they can help it.

I probably had about 70hrs combined on the King Air and its simulator, and then probably 25-30hrs in the VC10 sim before flying the real thing, so the real "leap" is done in the synthetic environment. Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Jan 3rd, 2008 at 10:17pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Charlie wrote on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 1:40pm:
I probably had about 70hrs combined on the King Air and its simulator, and then probably 25-30hrs in the VC10 sim before flying the real thing, so the real "leap" is done in the synthetic environment. Smiley


I get all trembly just thinking about flying a proper VC10 sim; LOL... must be sheer magic to get to crew the real thing. Grin I always enjoy flying it in FS9, although I usually shy away from big jets (yawn).
You've probably mentioned this already but: how many flight hours so far for you in the VC10?

Would you agree that transitioning to kerosene-burners requires some mental retooling (although I'll bet once you get used to it, it's much less skull-work than babysitting pistons)?
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Jan 4th, 2008 at 12:32pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
beaky wrote on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 10:17pm:
You've probably mentioned this already but: how many flight hours so far for you in the VC10?


Not very many, but increasing all the time. Wink
beaky wrote on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 10:17pm:
Would you agree that transitioning to kerosene-burners requires some mental retooling (although I'll bet once you get used to it, it's much less skull-work than babysitting pistons)?


Yes, and that is where the sim helps out a lot. In my earlier flying training there was a lot of emphasis on being able to "keep ahead of the aeroplane", particularly when flying low-level, or leading a formation - thinking well ahead.

What I've noticed with a big jet, aside from the obvious handling differences, is the need to be way way ahead, planning far further ahead, such as briefing times for the descent for example. A lot more energy management comes into play too, and anticipation; with the jets you have to think a few seconds ahead with power changes, as it takes a few seconds for the to spool up; on a piston single you may start levelling off 100-200ft from the required level, in a jet, you start the mechanics of it 1000-2000ft from the desired level. After a while though it all becomes natural...


...I hope! Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print