Search the archive:
 YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
  Simviation Forum › Graphic Gallery › Photos & Cameras › For Kris
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
For Kris (Read 620 times)
Dec 31st, 2007 at 9:36am

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
 Posts: 6011
 *****
 
Omag 2.0 wrote on Dec 29th, 2007 at 8:24am:
 
And another question, can you show the magnification of this lens. Ex a photo of the same area at 100 mm, 300 mm and at 400 mm. I'm dying to know what big a difference the extra 100 mm makes...


Just did it in the garden...

...      ...      ...      ...      



...

.mic
 
[center]...
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 9:39am

Fly2e   Offline
Global Moderator
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere!
KFRG

Gender: male
 Posts: 199132
 *****
 
Now that is what I call an example!  Wink
 
Intel Core i7 Extreme Processor 965, 4.2GHz/8MB L3 Cache, Asus P6T Deluxe V2 Intel X58 Chipset Cross
Fire & SLI Supported, Mushkin Redline 6GB (3X2GB) Memory, eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285, Vista 64.

...

Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:20am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
 *****
 
Mic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod... Wink Grin Grin Grin Grin

Only messin'...

I'll get m' coat! Grin
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:22am

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
 Posts: 6011
 *****
 
Charlie wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:20am:
Mic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod... Wink Grin Grin Grin Grin


What's really ironic is that it was taken from a tripod with a remote shutter release....ummm...maybe the wind did it  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Tongue Grin

.mic
 
[center]...
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:26am

alrot   Offline
Colonel
Freeware Designers Above
All..

Posts: 10231
 *****
 

Angry makes me wanna throw my stuppid camera against the wall , and it Kodak , Im so regret the quality is so poor , I didn't knew too much about digital cameras  Embarrassed

and they claim its 5mpixels , I think my cell phone has a better resolution..lol  Grin
 
...

Venezuela
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:50am

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
 *****
 
Mic, how much did you pick up your remote shutter release for? How do you like it? I like to do a lot of night photos, so it'd come in handy for myself.
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:52am

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
 Posts: 6011
 *****
 
it was a tenner in my local shop.....it's the really small RC1 wireless one Smiley

.mic
 
[center]...
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:52am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
 *****
 
Mictheslik wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:22am:
Charlie wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 10:20am:
Mic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod... Wink Grin Grin Grin Grin


What's really ironic is that it was taken from a tripod with a remote shutter release....ummm...maybe the wind did it  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Tongue Grin

.mic


How odd! Grin There is a definat hint of blur in that one! Wink Grin
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:10am

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
 Posts: 11985
 *****
 
Thanks Mic, this really give an idea. And I'm not going to pick on you!  Grin

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels...

Now if I only could find a bleedn' sunhood... no retailer has those in stock for my lense. Well excuse me if i didn't buy an L-lense!  Angry  Grin
 
&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:15am

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
 Posts: 6011
 *****
 
Omag 2.0 wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:10am:
Thanks Mic, this really give an idea. And I'm not going to pick on you!  Grin

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels...

Now if I only could find a bleedn' sunhood... no retailer has those in stock for my lense. Well excuse me if i didn't buy an L-lense!  Angry  Grin


I could sell you an ET60 for a reasonable price Wink

.mic
 
[center]...
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 12:43pm

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
 Posts: 11985
 *****
 
Won't work... it has to be a ET-65B  Roll Eyes The most expensive one, offcourse....
 
&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 12:58pm
Sierra Hotel   Ex Member

 
Omag 2.0 wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:10am:
No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 3:10pm

61_OTU   Offline
Colonel
We are the Dead. Short
days ago.....
The Village - nr Shrewsbury

Gender: male
 Posts: 1944
 *****
 
Quote:
Omag 2.0 wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:10am:
No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.


Were you using the converter with the 300mm?
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 3:26pm
Sierra Hotel   Ex Member

 
61_OTU wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 3:10pm:
Quote:
Omag 2.0 wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:10am:
No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.


Were you using the converter with the 300mm?

Nope, before I got the 400 I was using an 80-200 with a converter and before that a 75-300 (no converter with that, obviously!).
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Dec 31st, 2007 at 3:27pm

61_OTU   Offline
Colonel
We are the Dead. Short
days ago.....
The Village - nr Shrewsbury

Gender: male
 Posts: 1944
 *****
 
Quote:
61_OTU wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 3:10pm:
Quote:
Omag 2.0 wrote on Dec 31st, 2007 at 11:10am:
No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.


Were you using the converter with the 300mm?

Nope, before I got the 400 I was using an 80-200 with a converter and before that a 75-300 (no converter with that, obviously!).


Apologies, i thought you had a 300mm prime previously. Does the AF pack up if you try to use a 75-300 with a TC?
 
Back to top 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
  « Home ‹ Board Top of this page

Simviation Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5 AE!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge