Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Landing Approach (Read 1150 times)
Aug 26th, 2007 at 10:06am

Knighjet   Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!

Posts: 127
*****
 
How come every time i do a ILS approach i am never lined upo with the airport? I do exactly what the ATC say and i do correct landing procedures why does this still happen
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 26th, 2007 at 3:17pm

jnigeld11   Offline
Colonel
I Simviate!
USA

Gender: male
Posts: 177
*****
 
1) Do you have the correct ILS frequency tuned in your NAV 1 radio and is it active?
2) Do you get picked up on the localizer?
3) When asked to fly "straight in", is the auto-pilot auto-approach activated?
 

Hope all is well in your world today
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 26th, 2007 at 3:36pm

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
Work on it in a nice, slow 172 until the whole process becomes second nature..   Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 27th, 2007 at 10:59am

SubZer0   Offline
Colonel
KLNA

Gender: male
Posts: 3882
*****
 
lol Brett you're still not tired of having to say that? Or are you just being a nice guy?

You should probably go check out the procedures that there are in this site. I'm sure they will help you out.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Aug 27th, 2007 at 11:59am

Schnyd   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 46
*****
 
The ATC puts you in at an angle to intersect the ILS glide scope. You have to watch your ILS to see when it starts to move so that you know when to turn to get lined up for the final approach.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Aug 27th, 2007 at 12:13pm

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
Yeah.. I'm a nice guy.. just ask me,  I'll tell ya  Smiley

Seriously though.. If somebody takes the time to ask about stuff like that, I'll assume they taken their investment (hardware/software/time) seriously enough to want to fly realistically...  right ?  If they don't take it seriously and just want to play.. well.. I guess they can ignore the advice, and if they get upset, 'cause they think I'm snobbishly sarcastic; so be it.. because there'll be that one person who takes it to heart and ends up getting so much more out of simming than he thought possible...

Look at the words in the topic of this thread. Chances are that dozens if not hundreds of people will hit this thread while searching... most will not respond. I'd rather take the opportunity steer them down the realistic path, then to just give them a handful of instructions so they'll be able to eventually get a big tube down a glidescope, crashing 100 times along the way..

I know the urge to start buzzing around in big jets as an "instant airline captain" is tempting.. but you find out quickly, for one, it aint that easy.. and more importantly, it gets boring pretty quickly  Wink

There is SO much happening during a flight.. from takeoff to landing. Big jets move fast and it IS realistic to fly them by autopilot and GPS..// But it's way more satisfying to wrestle a big tube full of virtual passengers, from one airport to another, fully understanding each phase of the flight, knowing why you're doing what you're doing, and knowing that you can, and have, done it manually. If you're striving for realism... do you think you'd be in a position to monitor and autopilot, ILS approach in a 737, before you're able to do it by hand in a C172 ?  Do you think you'd be able to go blasting into contrloled airspace in a Lear, before you've been able to do it in a Baron; in 1 mile visibilty; with one engine out ? Do you think you should take off from JFK, bound for LAX, with a bunch of virtual souls in your charge before you're able to find your way cross country, by VOR/NDB, in a Mooney ?

Take your time... learn the basics... move on when you're ready. You'll find that setting up an airliner for a realistic approach comes easier when you understand the whole concept, and understand both sides of a power curve, because you've been there  Cool
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Aug 28th, 2007 at 8:32am

Pappy44   Offline
Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Maryland Heights, MO

Gender: male
Posts: 253
*****
 
plus landing the tubes on manual is so much more satisfying!  I came into O'Hare a couple of weeks ago, and as usual (i was on auto pilot ready for an ILS landing) the plane turned away from the runway when I hit the slope (only does this at ohare...not sure why).  I was ready for it this time and immediately turned off the autopilot, banked it back around, then did an instrument approach.  It was quite satisfying to land that puppy without the AP at all.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Aug 28th, 2007 at 8:41pm

MattNW   Offline
Colonel
Indiana

Gender: male
Posts: 1762
*****
 
FSX is a simulator. It simulates real life airplanes. There is a reason real life airliner captains start out in a trainer like a Cessna and work their way up to airliners. It's the same thing in a simulator. You are simulating real life so you need to simulate real life training and progression of your skills. FSX isn't a perfect simulator. It's watered down quite a bit so your training doesn't need to be as complete and lengthy as real life but there is a little to learn and unless you learn that you'll never be proficient flying large aircraft.

I'm not saying to park the 747 until you complete every certificate in the Flight Lessons. Actually the lessons are about as buggy in FSX as they have been in earlier versions but the concepts are relevant and real. Take the time to learn them and flying all aircraft in the sim will be much easier. Have fun with the airliners but take some time to go through the lessons and learn about real life flying. You'll be amazed at what you will learn in a relatively short period.
 

In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print