Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Specific Aircraft Types
› Aurora: is it real?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
...
6
Aurora: is it real? (Read 17269 times)
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 2:54pm
BloodPhoenix123
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Gender:
Posts: 9
The Aurora is a rumored supersonic capable aircraft, and might go as fast as Mach 20.
Here's the basic deatails in a nutshell:
What the Aurora's statistics are thought to be:
Mission:
Reconnaissance
Length:
About 110 feet
Width:
About 60 feet
Take-off Weight:
Completely unknown
Fuel:
LH2/LO2
Fuel Weight:
Completely unknown
Main Propulsion:
At subsonic speeds:
Conventional jet engines.
At supersonic speeds, there are 4 possible propulsion systems:
Pulse Detonation Wave Engine
Ramjet
Scramjet
Regular Pulsejet
Get more information on these propulsion systems with the book, Advanced Airbreathing Propulsion.
Take-off Thrust:
Probably very high
Maximum Speed:
Mach 6-20 (Most people believe that its speed is Mach 6-8, but some think that it could go up to Mach 20.)
Armament:
Unlikely to be capable of armament but may be capable of launching Phoenix Air to Air missiles.
The most likely system of thrust it uses is a Pulse Detonation Wave Engine. Heres a site link:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/pdwe.html
Post whether you think it exists or not, and it would be pretty cool if a user made a model for fsx.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 3:22pm
MOUSY
Offline
Colonel
The artist formerly known
as: Mouse Ace
Commonwealth of Dominica
Gender:
Posts: 2117
I've heard about this so-called craft. Quite possible it exists; 2-3 decades ago, people were dead sure that nothing could travel at Mach 3, reach to the limits of our atmosphere, or have the radar cross section of a small bird.
Anyway, No one can model it without pictures and this is in the wrong forum anyway, should be in the "Specific Aircraft Types" section.
Check out my PAYWARE quality, FREEWARE release of DominicaX.
HP HDX 16 | Centrino2 2.26Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | Nvidia GT130 1GB DDR2 | 500GB HDD
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 4:28pm
BloodPhoenix123
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Gender:
Posts: 9
It got moved..., and im gonna post a picture, im just looking for a good one...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 4:29pm
BloodPhoenix123
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Gender:
Posts: 9
Heres a fairly good picture:
http://img.timeinc.net/popsci/images/2006/09/blackairplanes_ss_4.jpg
just look up aurora on google images if you want more.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 4:49pm
BloodPhoenix123
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Gender:
Posts: 9
And the wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_aircraft
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 4:53pm
krigl
Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.
Gender:
Posts: 8255
BloodPhoenix123 wrote
on Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 4:29pm:
Heres a fairly good picture:
http://img.timeinc.net/popsci/images/2006/09/blackairplanes_ss_4.jpg
just look up aurora on google images if you want more.
I don't care if Aurora exists or not, if someone made a model like that I'd fly it with joy
I read in a recent aviation magazine that Congress recently gave some money for development of a new spyplane to replace the (now defunct I believe) SR-71. Maybe it already exists or is in a late state of development if this is true and they are getting ready to announce it to the public....
If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens
...HERE
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 7:21pm
john_uk
Ex Member
thing is, with the american government, their is every possibility it could indeed exist but then every possibility it could not, one thing the US gov can do is top secret dev. and then make it work quite well
personaly, the concept is good, but i can imagine it being like the concorde, to expensive to run.
what fuel would it use to reach mach 20?
if it was conventional fuels how much is it wasteing?
if its not conventional, is their any chance it could be accesable by use plebs in the near future as a replacemane to fossil fuels?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 7:36pm
BloodPhoenix123
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Fly Sim!
Gender:
Posts: 9
It may exist, in fact it probably does...
They break between the military's current day tech and the press is 12 years. The press is way behind.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 7:48pm
john_uk
Ex Member
if thats so,
any respect i have for the US government is lost
here i am, paying 96pence on average for a litre of unleaded fuel when the us govt. possibly has a more efficent alternative, any govt. that can keep the world on the brink of bankcruptcy for its own gains over the former soviet union deserves to be shot!!!
if it is running on conventional fossil fuels, then its wasteing an awful lot of it, and for what, no particular reason, just to see how far they can push the envelope at the exepense of everyday pleb, who will suffer increase fuel prices thanks to their wasite of fossil fuels.
either way, if this project is real, its a waste or a very selfish act of supremacy over the russians.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Aug 11
th
, 2007 at 11:22pm
elite marksman
Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to Simv!
Gender:
Posts: 855
The aurora is real, but it is neither a supersonic aircraft, nor is it a reconnaissance aircraft.
"The funding for the [Stealth Bomber] competition came out of the Air Force budget. A young colonel working in the Air Force 'black program' office at the Pentagon, named Buz Carpenter, arbitrarily assigned the funding the code name Aurora. Somehow this name leaked out during congressional appropriations hearings, the media picked up the Aurora item in the budget, and the rumor surfaced that it was a top secret project assigned to the Skunk Works -- to build America's first hypersonic airplane. That story persists to this day even though Aurora was the code name for the B-2 competition funding. Although I expect few in the media to believe me, there is no code name for the hypersonic plane, because it simply does not exist. "
Ben Rich is the former CEO of Lockheed-Martin's Skunk Works. The above quote is from his book
Sunk Works
, pages 309 and 310.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Aug 12
th
, 2007 at 11:54am
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Whether it is called Aurora or not and weather this particular incarnation exits of not, the USA have never got rid of a spy plane before the next one was up and running. Fact is satellites are only good when it is not cloudy. Radar pictures and IR do not give the depth and clarity of a photo, they take time to maneuver into place, and require the space shuttle to fix them. Which means, somewhere in a hanger surrounded by large men with large guns is the next U2/SR71/Aurora. Non believer, make an advanced booking for one of the major air shows...........20 years or so should do it.
Matt
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Aug 12
th
, 2007 at 12:58pm
elite marksman
Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to Simv!
Gender:
Posts: 855
The U2 and SR-71 are only good when it is not cloudy as well. Almost all clouds are at less than 70,000 feet.
At the moment, the U-2 is the only active dedicated optical reconnaissance aircraft. We have many ELINT aircraft, but only one designed for taking pictures.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Aug 12
th
, 2007 at 10:28pm
MOUSY
Offline
Colonel
The artist formerly known
as: Mouse Ace
Commonwealth of Dominica
Gender:
Posts: 2117
Don't forget the up and coming UAVs.
Check out my PAYWARE quality, FREEWARE release of DominicaX.
HP HDX 16 | Centrino2 2.26Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | Nvidia GT130 1GB DDR2 | 500GB HDD
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Aug 12
th
, 2007 at 11:08pm
elite marksman
Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to Simv!
Gender:
Posts: 855
True... but they aren't real aircraft.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Aug 13
th
, 2007 at 12:12am
MOUSY
Offline
Colonel
The artist formerly known
as: Mouse Ace
Commonwealth of Dominica
Gender:
Posts: 2117
Does it have to be manned to be an aircraft? I pretty much think craft is synonymous with vehicle in this sense.
Check out my PAYWARE quality, FREEWARE release of DominicaX.
HP HDX 16 | Centrino2 2.26Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | Nvidia GT130 1GB DDR2 | 500GB HDD
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
...
6
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types ««
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.