Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› A380 to visit Brussels airport next week
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
A380 to visit Brussels airport next week (Read 1081 times)
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 5:42am
deadkennedy
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Deepcreek, Belgium
Posts: 208
Great news, the A-380 is coming to Brussels next week.
http://www.luchtzak.be/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=14369
Great news for Belgian and Dutch spotters.
I'm going to try to be there.
Cheers, Frank.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 8:21am
pepper_airborne
Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands
Posts: 2390
Ah, interesting.
http://white-line.org/&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 8:27am
Heathaze
Ex Member
I still can't quite understand why it's so exciting to enthusiasts when the A380 visits their area. It'll be common place soon enough (never mind that it's ugly and boring)...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 10:50am
bok269
Offline
Colonel
I've become a badger lover.
Make badgers not war!!
HPN
Gender:
Posts: 1461
Interesting. Brussels never struck me as an airport that would see the A380.
Check out my around the world tour!
&&
http://fsxaroundtheworld.blogspot.com/
&&Reality is wrong; Dreams are for real. -Tupac&&&&No bird soars too high, if he soars with his own wings. -William Blake&&&&The way I see it, you can either work for a living or you can fly airplanes. Me, I'd rather fly. -Len Morgan&&&&To invent an airplane is nothing. To build an airplane is something. But to fly ... is everything. -Otto Lilienthal&&&&
I will not be silenced by a stupid badger!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 10:56am
Björn
Ex Member
Quote:
It'll be common place soon enough (never mind that it's ugly and boring)...
But it's still brand new...thats what makes it interesting.
I bet the Concord was exciting as well when it did the first tests...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 11:03am
Heathaze
Ex Member
Björn wrote
on Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 10:56am:
Quote:
It'll be common place soon enough (never mind that it's ugly and boring)...
But it's still brand new...thats what makes it interesting.
I bet the Concord was exciting as well when it did the first tests...
The Concorde stayed interesting though, it wasn't just a development of another existing airliner.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 12:10pm
Björn
Ex Member
Quote:
The Concorde stayed interesting though, it wasn't just a development of another existing airliner.
Neither is the A380.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 12:14pm
Heathaze
Ex Member
Björn wrote
on Jun 18
th
, 2007 at 12:10pm:
Quote:
The Concorde stayed interesting though, it wasn't just a development of another existing airliner.
Neither is the A380.
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 10:28am
Björn
Ex Member
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.
Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 11:25am
Heathaze
Ex Member
Björn wrote
on Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 10:28am:
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.
Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.
I'm not bothered about how successful it was, it was a beautiful aircraft that inspired people and was instantly recognisable. That's what matters to me (and many others) as an enthusiast, not how successful it was being a bus.
The A380 could carry millions of people everywhere for a century with a superb career and I still wouldn't care about it in the slightest, it's got zero character, just a boring double decker bus.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 11:45am
Tweek
Ex Member
Björn wrote
on Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 10:28am:
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.
Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.
So did British Airways and Air France operate it for 30 years just for the sake of it, then?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 12:11pm
Björn
Ex Member
Quote:
So did British Airways and Air France operate it for 30 years just for the sake of it, then?
All for public image and to make them "different" from other airlines.
The Concorde surely was a unique and distinguishable aircraft, but it was crystal clear that it wouldn't stand a chance on the airline market without constant financial injections.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jun 23
rd
, 2007 at 6:29am
spitfire boy
Offline
Colonel
Welcome to my world.
Wherever you think I'm not
Gender:
Posts: 2788
Björn wrote
on Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 12:11pm:
Quote:
So did British Airways and Air France operate it for 30 years just for the sake of it, then?
All for public image and to make them "different" from other airlines.
The Concorde surely was a unique and distinguishable aircraft, but it was crystal clear that it wouldn't stand a chance on the airline market without constant financial injections.
WWWWWWWWWWRONG!!!!!!!!
contrary to popular belief, BA operated concorde with huge profitability for lengthy periods of time, including after the concorde crash. What did for it was Airbus' cutting of replacement part supply.
Quote:
Björn wrote
on Jun 19
th
, 2007 at 10:28am:
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.
Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.
I'm not bothered about how successful it was, it was a beautiful aircraft that inspired people and was instantly recognisable. That's what matters to me (and many others) as an enthusiast, not how successful it was being a bus.
The A380 could carry millions of people everywhere for a century with a superb career and I still wouldn't care about it in the slightest, it's got zero character, just a boring double decker bus.
I bet if the new superjumbo was a boeing, you'd be singing the praises of it.
When it boils down to it, does the passenger actually care what kind of airliner he flies in? He'd only ever consciously be interested in what type he was flying if the type in question was concorde - because, like you said, it was so radically different. The airlines are the ones that care about different types, and they don't care about looks, they care about statistics. The statistics for the A380 are looking very pretty for airlines.
&&&&[center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jun 23
rd
, 2007 at 6:48am
Heathaze
Ex Member
spitfire boy wrote
on Jun 23
rd
, 2007 at 6:29am:
I bet if the new superjumbo was a boeing, you'd be singing the praises of it.
When it boils down to it, does the passenger actually care what kind of airliner he flies in? He'd only ever consciously be interested in what type he was flying if the type in question was concorde - because, like you said, it was so radically different. The airlines are the ones that care about different types, and they don't care about looks, they care about statistics. The statistics for the A380 are looking very pretty for airlines.
Why would I sing the praises of a Boeing Superjumbo? It would still be an ugly, boring and characterless bus. I know they don't care about looks they are, after all, a business, but that is precisely why I hate airliners!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jun 23
rd
, 2007 at 7:09am
spitfire boy
Offline
Colonel
Welcome to my world.
Wherever you think I'm not
Gender:
Posts: 2788
O.K. Sorry for the boeing comment.
Actually, it seems we're actually arguing over something we agree on, and we just haven't realized we're agreeing yet!!!
&&&&[center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.