Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
A380 to visit Brussels airport next week (Read 1081 times)
Jun 18th, 2007 at 5:42am

deadkennedy   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Deepcreek, Belgium

Posts: 208
*****
 
Great news, the A-380 is coming to Brussels next week.

http://www.luchtzak.be/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=14369

Great news for Belgian and Dutch spotters.

I'm going to try to be there.

Cheers, Frank.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 8:21am

pepper_airborne   Offline
Colonel
Voorhout - The Netherlands

Posts: 2390
*****
 
Ah, interesting.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 8:27am
Heathaze   Ex Member

 
I still can't quite understand why it's so exciting to enthusiasts when the A380 visits their area. It'll be common place soon enough (never mind that it's ugly and boring)...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 10:50am

bok269   Offline
Colonel
I've become a badger lover.
Make badgers not war!!
HPN

Gender: male
Posts: 1461
*****
 
Interesting.  Brussels never struck me as an airport that would see the A380.
 

Check out my around the world tour!
&&http://fsxaroundtheworld.blogspot.com/
&&Reality is wrong; Dreams are for real.  -Tupac&&&&No bird soars too high, if he soars with his own wings.  -William Blake&&&&The way I see it, you can either work for a living or you can fly airplanes. Me, I'd rather fly.  -Len Morgan&&&&To invent an airplane is nothing. To build an airplane is something. But to fly ... is everything.  -Otto Lilienthal&&&&
I will not be silenced by a stupid badger!
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 10:56am
Björn   Ex Member

 
Quote:
It'll be common place soon enough (never mind that it's ugly and boring)...


But it's still brand new...thats what makes it interesting.


I bet the Concord was exciting as well when it did the first tests...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 11:03am
Heathaze   Ex Member

 
Björn wrote on Jun 18th, 2007 at 10:56am:
Quote:
It'll be common place soon enough (never mind that it's ugly and boring)...


But it's still brand new...thats what makes it interesting.


I bet the Concord was exciting as well when it did the first tests...


The Concorde stayed interesting though, it wasn't just a development of another existing airliner. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 12:10pm
Björn   Ex Member

 
Quote:
The Concorde stayed interesting though, it wasn't just a development of another existing airliner. Wink


Neither is the A380.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jun 18th, 2007 at 12:14pm
Heathaze   Ex Member

 
Björn wrote on Jun 18th, 2007 at 12:10pm:
Quote:
The Concorde stayed interesting though, it wasn't just a development of another existing airliner. Wink


Neither is the A380.

Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jun 19th, 2007 at 10:28am
Björn   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.


Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jun 19th, 2007 at 11:25am
Heathaze   Ex Member

 
Björn wrote on Jun 19th, 2007 at 10:28am:
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.


Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.


I'm not bothered about how successful it was, it was a beautiful aircraft that inspired people and was instantly recognisable. That's what matters to me (and many others) as an enthusiast, not how successful it was being a bus.
The A380 could carry millions of people everywhere for a century with a superb career and I still wouldn't care about it in the slightest, it's got zero character, just a boring double decker bus.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jun 19th, 2007 at 11:45am
Tweek   Ex Member

 
Björn wrote on Jun 19th, 2007 at 10:28am:
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.


Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.


So did British Airways and Air France operate it for 30 years just for the sake of it, then? Huh
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jun 19th, 2007 at 12:11pm
Björn   Ex Member

 
Quote:
So did British Airways and Air France operate it for 30 years just for the sake of it, then? Huh


All for public image and to make them "different" from other airlines.

The Concorde surely was a unique and distinguishable aircraft, but it was crystal clear that it wouldn't stand a chance on the airline market without constant financial injections.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jun 23rd, 2007 at 6:29am

spitfire boy   Offline
Colonel
Welcome to my world.
Wherever you think I'm not

Gender: male
Posts: 2788
*****
 
Björn wrote on Jun 19th, 2007 at 12:11pm:
Quote:
So did British Airways and Air France operate it for 30 years just for the sake of it, then? Huh


All for public image and to make them "different" from other airlines.

The Concorde surely was a unique and distinguishable aircraft, but it was crystal clear that it wouldn't stand a chance on the airline market without constant financial injections.



WWWWWWWWWWRONG!!!!!!!!

contrary to popular belief, BA operated concorde with huge profitability for lengthy periods of time, including after the concorde crash. What did for it was Airbus' cutting of replacement part supply.

Quote:
Björn wrote on Jun 19th, 2007 at 10:28am:
Quote:
Not literally, but it's blatantly just aimed at being sort of a double decker 747, the Concorde (or the Tu144) was a totally unique design as far as airliners went.


Unique, yet as successful as a c-movie actor trying to win an Academy Award.


I'm not bothered about how successful it was, it was a beautiful aircraft that inspired people and was instantly recognisable. That's what matters to me (and many others) as an enthusiast, not how successful it was being a bus.
The A380 could carry millions of people everywhere for a century with a superb career and I still wouldn't care about it in the slightest, it's got zero character, just a boring double decker bus.


I bet if the new superjumbo was a boeing, you'd be singing the praises of it.

When it boils down to it, does the passenger actually care what kind of airliner he flies in? He'd only ever consciously be interested in what type he was flying if the type in question was concorde - because, like you said, it was so radically different. The airlines are the ones that care about different types, and they don't care about looks, they care about statistics. The statistics for the A380 are looking very pretty for airlines.
 

...
&&&&[center]
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jun 23rd, 2007 at 6:48am
Heathaze   Ex Member

 
spitfire boy wrote on Jun 23rd, 2007 at 6:29am:
I bet if the new superjumbo was a boeing, you'd be singing the praises of it.

When it boils down to it, does the passenger actually care what kind of airliner he flies in? He'd only ever consciously be interested in what type he was flying if the type in question was concorde - because, like you said, it was so radically different. The airlines are the ones that care about different types, and they don't care about looks, they care about statistics. The statistics for the A380 are looking very pretty for airlines.


Why would I sing the praises of a Boeing Superjumbo? It would still be an ugly, boring and characterless bus. I know they don't care about looks they are, after all, a business, but that is precisely why I hate airliners!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Jun 23rd, 2007 at 7:09am

spitfire boy   Offline
Colonel
Welcome to my world.
Wherever you think I'm not

Gender: male
Posts: 2788
*****
 
O.K. Sorry for the boeing comment.

Actually, it seems we're actually arguing over something we agree on, and we just haven't realized we're agreeing yet!!! Grin
 

...
&&&&[center]
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print