Simviation Forum - Deltanada

Mar 13^th, 2007 at 8:05pm

krigl Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.

Gender:
Posts: 8255

Today's edits...

Thanks for looking in!

Krigl

If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Mar 13^th, 2007 at 8:28pm

FSGT Gabe Offline
Colonel
Member of StudioV Gallery
Board
Home airport: CYOO

Gender:
Posts: 1597

#2 is amazing Shocked

! AWESOME Krigl! I love it Cheesy

.

- Kevin Cheesy

&&

Studio V - Your destination for all your screenshot needs...

&&

Windows Vista Premium Edition - Pentium® D Processor 820 Dual Core @ 2.8 GHz, 2 GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM, 250 GB HD w/ DataBurst Cache, 256 MB ATI Radeon X1300 Pro, 19 inch E197FP Analog Flat Panel, Saitek X45 Joystick

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Mar 13^th, 2007 at 8:33pm

Double_Farvel Offline
Colonel
Champions League Winner!
New Jersey, USA

Gender:
Posts: 1074

Amazing edits krigl, especially number two Shocked

!

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Mar 14^th, 2007 at 8:07am

Heretic Ex Member

Yes, no, no, yes, no.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Mar 14^th, 2007 at 9:34am

Taters Offline
Colonel
Is it heavy?Then put it
down it's probly expensive

Gender:
Posts: 42

Good shots. A little dark for my tastes
-Taters

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Mar 14^th, 2007 at 3:26pm

Mees Offline
Colonel
Netherlands, the

Gender:
Posts: 4041

You have a 1280X1024 of #4....?.. Shocked

&&AMD Athlon 4200+ :: Gigabyte K8n-SLi :: 1GB RAM :: 7900GTX 512MB&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Mar 14^th, 2007 at 7:00pm

Splat762 Offline
Colonel
IYAOYAS
NAS Whidbey Island, WA. USA

Gender:
Posts: 760

+1

I'd love a Hi-res version of number 4! Grin

Great edits man!!!

Naval Aviation - Fight to fly, fly to fight, fight to win.&&Sig by Stormtropper/9thSimplex&&&&Aviation Ordnanceman 1st Class, U.S. Navy - Putting warheads on foreheads since 1995&&&&http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/splatcodsig.jpg&&&&&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Mar 15^th, 2007 at 5:47am

krigl Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.

Gender:
Posts: 8255

Thanks!

Quote:

no

You're kidding! Shocked

I'd say number two is one of my best edits ever..... but hey, different strokes for different fowkes...

If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #8 - Mar 15^th, 2007 at 9:41am

Heretic Ex Member

The motion blur simply doesn't do the trick for me. Half of the pic looks like a screenshot of a rotating 744, half of it looks like a mediocre attempt at "motion blurring" a rotating 744.
There is no "whole" impression, just "non-blurred" - "blurred".

It would have been better to either blur the background or the whole airplane, not just half of it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #9 - Mar 15^th, 2007 at 11:32am

krigl Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.

Gender:
Posts: 8255

Quote:

The motion blur simply doesn't do the trick for me. Half of the pic looks like a screenshot of a rotating 744, half of it looks like a mediocre attempt at "motion blurring" a rotating 744.
There is no "whole" impression, just "non-blurred" - "blurred".

It would have been better to either blur the background or the whole airplane, not just half of it.

'Mediocre'? You don't mince words, do you mate.... I think the plane is so close to the 'camera' or one's 'eye' that only part of it would be in focus... and if not, well, I like the effect anyway! I did it by motion blurring the whole shot, then using the eraser on low opacity to grade the blur further and pick out the bits I wanted clear.

I've seen and done other edits of the standard type....and I like experimenting. I'm not trying to be the best, just to get better and if not, to just have fun anyway

Thanks for clarifying, feedback is good, even negative.

If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #10 - Mar 15^th, 2007 at 11:36am

krigl Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.

Gender:
Posts: 8255

Mees wrote on Mar 14^th, 2007 at 3:26pm:

You have a 1280X1024 of #4....?.. Shocked

Thanks Splat and Mees, it's an honour that you'd like a copy...

I have an unedited pic of that size, or an edited pic of 900 by 720 or something similar which would probably look okay expanded....

Send me your email by pm if you'd like a copy.

If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #11 - Mar 15^th, 2007 at 8:49pm

AgentJohnson Offline
Colonel

Posts: 91

4 is awesome

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #12 - Mar 15^th, 2007 at 8:59pm

Souichiro Ex Member

Actually I'm going with K here! No2 Is bloody magnificent!

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #13 - Mar 16^th, 2007 at 8:38am

Heretic Ex Member

krigl wrote on Mar 15^th, 2007 at 11:32am:

I think the plane is so close to the 'camera' or one's 'eye' that only part of it would be in focus...

It may work on real photos or in a real eye, but in a screenshot, in which every detail counts to recreate an impression that is as close as possible to reality, it simply does not work out at all.

Quote:

I've seen and done other edits of the standard type....and I like experimenting. I'm not trying to be the best, just to get better and if not, to just have fun anyway

Thanks for clarifying, feedback is good, even negative.

Well, I'm not hindering you, just trying to give honest feedback. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: