Dispatchcode wrote on Mar 6
th, 2007 at 9:50am:
but is that TTOOLS compatible with FSX thou?
There are utilities emerging that will convert the FS9-format TTools files into FSX-format
files that can then be run through the TrafficDataBaseBuilder to create a FSX "traffic_xxx.bgl"
The unmodified FS9-format "traffic_xxx.bgl" files will work, with a few quirk, in FSX just by
placing them in the Scenery\World\scenery folder as you did in FS9. HOWEVER, you will
then lose all the AI traffic created with FSX-format bgl's, for reasons only the Aces team
knows
I have just begun converting my FS9 files into FSX format using one of the utilities ( aisort )
but it is not a job for the impatient or faint at heart.
The new TDBB is a VERY finicky piece of....ah....software and it takes alot of effort to get
it to compile an error-free FS9 traffic conversion, even with the time-saving tool such as
aisort. The requirements of TDBB are not spelled out with any detail or clarity in the SDK,
which to me isn't surprising as I find all the FS SDK's to be sorely lacking in most areas.
So it's a matter of alot of guesswork, trial and error and starting and re-starting FSX to
get through the process.
Before aisort was published ( just a few days ago ), I spent three FULL days converting
a fairly simple, 73 aircraft, 10-airfield flightplan from FS9 format to FSX format.
( thank goodness I'm retitred! )
I lost track of the number of times I had to go back and "adjust" departure/arrival
times to get TDBB to "find" parking for the aircraft when ample parking was available!
I had to eliminate virtually ALL the TNG's in the plan since TDBB will only allow 3 aircraft
in the pattern at any given airport and even when I only had 1 A/C doing TNG's, it
still "coulnd not find a slot for touch and go's".
TDBB, IMO, is an OVERLY restrictive implementation and most likely, not well tested
from the results I'm seeing. TTools, even with it's "not complient with the SDK" areas,
was a FAR better tool for creating AI traffic, fast and easily. TDBB is just the OPPOSITE!.
Hope that answers your question
Paul