Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› USAF: Indian Exercises Showed Need For F/A-22
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
USAF: Indian Exercises Showed Need For F/A-22 (Read 524 times)
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 9:31am
Fitter
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Gender:
Posts: 4263
Here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 9:50am
eniranjanrao
Offline
Colonel
I am a Stupid pillock
and I have been banned!
VAPO-Pune
Gender:
Posts: 220
I had mentioned this a few weeks ago but no one too me seriously as I in India and have contact wtih some IAF guys I know the true story.
The IAF beat the hell of USAF and RAF also.
I've been banned for constantly ignoring the forum rules, spamming, being abusive to mods and making false accusations against them. They've modified this profile to show everyone what happens to obnoxious foul-mouthed little idiots!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 10:07am
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
This is old news.
Part of the result was the USAF not really trying very hard. Because if the F15 came out a clear winner in any military exercise then the government may think that the F22 was a waste of time and cut funding to it.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 1:48pm
Fitter
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Gender:
Posts: 4263
eniranjanrao wrote
on Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 9:50am:
I had mentioned this a few weeks ago but no one too me seriously as I in India and have contact wtih some IAF guys I know the true story.
The IAF beat the hell of USAF and RAF also.
I agree with you... IAF rocks!
...and as well USAF...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 1:51pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Woodlouse2002 wrote
on Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 10:07am:
Part of the result was the USAF not really trying very hard. Because if the F15 came out a clear winner in any military exercise then the government may think that the F22 was a waste of time and cut funding to it.
Exactly. A very good friend of mine in marine intelligence had plenty to say about this, and the bulk of it was "don't put too much stock in it." It is of course ridiculous to say the USAF deliberately threw it, but I doubt they seriously exerted themselves in a friendly exercise-not to mention
they were outnumbered in every single exercise against comparable aircraft
.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 9:21pm
SkyNoz
Offline
Colonel
Project Kfir!
Gender:
Posts: 1720
Really disagree, that the F-22 will become a exported fighter for allies, that is just too early in the game, "my opinion", and don't see a real good reason for a change from the F-15. The F-15 has the most sophisticated radar, across from the F-22 and shoot to kill awareness, shooting beyond enemy sight etc. That's all they need.
Project Kfir!&&
&&
My Gmax page
&&Aircraft modeler/Aircarft painter&&&&Aye the key!&&[GeneralEngineData]&&//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 10:11pm
expat
Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!
Gender:
Posts: 8499
Woodlouse2002 wrote
on Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 10:07am:
This is old news.
Part of the result was the USAF not really trying very hard. Because if the F15 came out a clear winner in any military exercise then the government may think that the F22 was a waste of time and cut funding to it.
Sorry, but I think that you will not find a single fighter Jockey in the world that in any sort of combat, real or training is "not really trying very hard". Their
Egos
are just toooooooo
big
PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals.
B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Dec 13
th
, 2006 at 8:47am
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
expat wrote
on Dec 12
th
, 2006 at 10:11pm:
Sorry, but I think that you will not find a single fighter Jockey in the world that in any sort of combat, real or training is "not really trying very hard". Their
Egos
are just toooooooo
big
I've already addressed that point in my post.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Dec 13
th
, 2006 at 5:17pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
1: Proving that they needed the F/A-22 was a pre-planned goal... im not surprised about that.
2: They really got their asses kicked by MiG-21's
3: IAF wasnt even showing their best (Su-30MKI with TVC was kept in the hangar as the US wasn't willing to let the F-117 join in the fun)
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Dec 14
th
, 2006 at 2:50pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Ivan wrote
on Dec 13
th
, 2006 at 5:17pm:
3: IAF wasnt even showing their best (Su-30MKI with TVC was kept in the hangar as the US wasn't willing to let the F-117 join in the fun)
That'll be because the US don't like letting people in on the fact that their stealth aircraft arn't as stealthy as they would have you want to believe.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Dec 15
th
, 2006 at 8:17pm
SkyNoz
Offline
Colonel
Project Kfir!
Gender:
Posts: 1720
Woodlouse2002 wrote
on Dec 14
th
, 2006 at 2:50pm:
Ivan wrote
on Dec 13
th
, 2006 at 5:17pm:
3: IAF wasnt even showing their best (Su-30MKI with TVC was kept in the hangar as the US wasn't willing to let the F-117 join in the fun)
That'll be because the US don't like letting people in on the fact that their stealth aircraft arn't as stealthy as they would have you want to believe.
LOL your funny
Project Kfir!&&
&&
My Gmax page
&&Aircraft modeler/Aircarft painter&&&&Aye the key!&&[GeneralEngineData]&&//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Dec 16
th
, 2006 at 7:02pm
Fitter
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Gender:
Posts: 4263
[quote author=
2: They really got their asses kicked by MiG-21's
quote]
This is wonderfull nowdays...an old birb still kicking some a**es... the Bison version...and USAF agree with that...lol
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Dec 17
th
, 2006 at 8:04pm
Fitter
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Gender:
Posts: 4263
Just to end with this subject
Check this link
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Dec 17
th
, 2006 at 9:55pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
And that article confirms what has been said before-Americans were outnumbered 3 to 1 in EVERY scenario, and India has some damn good pilots. In wartime, I know who I'm sticking with.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Dec 18
th
, 2006 at 7:57am
Chris_F
Offline
Colonel
Insert message here
Posts: 1364
beefhole wrote
on Dec 17
th
, 2006 at 9:55pm:
And that article confirms what has been said before-Americans were outnumbered 3 to 1 in EVERY scenario, and India has some damn good pilots. In wartime, I know who I'm sticking with.
But the American strategy has always been to use technology to counter a numerically superior opponent. 3:1 is what US pilots should be prepared to encounter in real life engagements. The cynical view is that the whole thing is a ruse to bolster funding for the F-22. But the timing isn't right, it's about two years too late. Funding for the F-22 is firm. With JSF pushed out and the Defense Industrial Supply Base law thing (that says the Air Force MUST fund the F-22 until JSF production begins) and nobody really challenging the F-22 funding there's no reason to spend a zillion dollars in jet fuel and give yourself a media black eye by having your pilots lose to a (popularly assumed) technically inferior adversary. The real story here is how skilkled and talented the Indian Air Force pilots are.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.