Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Tips for those with lesser systems? (Read 4444 times)
Nov 7th, 2006 at 5:14pm
Souichiro   Ex Member

 
Hey everyone!

As some of you might know.. my system isn't really that good.... a Pentium 4 2,66 ghz and a gforce 4200 8xti card and 768 mb of ram... basically not the best out there.. I know there are worse systems out there and also some similar systems... I know Omag's system is nearly the same as mine.. and Mr Mugel's also I think...

Anyway

For those with a lesser system.. what do you do to make your shots look good?

I heard Krigl or Kris once mention that he used stuff like Fog to blur out the distant scenery so that fs would have to load less and enhance the scenery up close...

Clipper also gave me a wonderful .CFG edit a while ago which greatly enhanced the scenery loading! Clip? which one was that?

As for me.... Well my favorite flying time is Building storms or Nice day from Silverwings... I usually fly in my favorite area's with which I'm familiar..

My Alps region looks quite ok, Sandmann mesh and Lennart's textures+ Silverwings residue..... I've taken up a lot of dawn/dusk flying lately.. Also I'm quite satisfied with my England and St Maarten area... basically I stick to area's I'm used to. Also A trick which might be very usefull is to zoom out bij pressing the - key. I use F1-view and with that tool I zoom back in and out. Somehow using the minus key sharpens up the lot. Use it once or maybe twice without getting to much distortion.

Basically Those are my tricks as far as I can remember them right now.. Should you have any more questions I'm willing to answer them. I ask of you your tricks in screenshooting.

The most important thing in life and also in fs is Working with what you can do. And not to be limited by what you can't

Now for some shots of my favorite area's

Austrian Alps
...

St Maarten ( TNCM area)
...

Another Area I didn't mention British Columbia in Canada with definite use of the - key
...

A bit of Uk scenery
...

Hope you enjoyed this thread and found use for the tips..... Hope you can give some of your tips as well!

Cheers

Soui
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Nov 7th, 2006 at 5:24pm

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
Hi Soui...!

All your tips are fine for all those heroes that fly at 30,000+ Feet AGL...

...what we need are tips for all those who land at ground level, and fly at 100/500 feet AGL, banked over, and skimming smoothly over all the Autogen tree-tops and buildings.... Shocked...!

That's where the problem lies...Wink...!

Paul...Low and Slow... Wink...!

P.S. Fab pics.....at 30,000 feet AGL... Wink... Grin...!
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Nov 7th, 2006 at 6:02pm
Souichiro   Ex Member

 
You might want to check out Silverwing then Paul...

Especially suited and purposely built for low and slow... Might wanna ask Rollerball for more info

http://www.fsimcafe.com/Downloads/ShowDownload.aspx?ProductID=1468
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Nov 7th, 2006 at 9:36pm

Clipper   Offline
Global Moderator
Clearly Canadian

Posts: 8861
*****
 
Ahh yes, the scenery cfg. That's a story in itself. But, to make a long story short, this is the scenery cfg. The results are quite dramatic....keeps close and distant scenery in razor sharp focus..

. Backup your current working FS9.CFG first!!!(found at C:\Documents and Settings\Your User Name\Application Data\Microsoft\FS9)

TERRAIN_ERROR_FACTOR=100.000000
TERRAIN_MIN_DEM_AREA=10.000000
TERRAIN_MAX_DEM_AREA=100.000000
TERRAIN_MAX_VERTEX_LEVEL=21
TERRAIN_TEXTURE_SIZE_EXP=8
TERRAIN_AUTOGEN_DENSITY=5
TERRAIN_USE_GRADIENT_MAP=1
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_TEXTURES=1
TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.500000
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=8.500000
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_LEVELS=1242456

BTW, great set of pics and some sound advice Soui.  Smiley
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Nov 7th, 2006 at 10:30pm
Jakemaster   Ex Member

 
There is a way to make your max unlimited visibility lower...

Under the Weather section of the fs9.cfg, change MAX_UNLIMITED_VIS from 96560 to 36210.

It makes the unlimited visibility alot lower which is more realistic and blurry textures in the distance blend in with the blurry fog
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Nov 8th, 2006 at 2:37am
Mr.Mugel   Ex Member

 
[DISPLAY]
UPPER_FRAMERATE_LIMIT=20
TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=100
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=10
//RUNWAY_LIGHTS_SURFACE_SCALAR=.9
//RUNWAY_LIGHTS_VASI_SCALAR=.9
//RUNWAY_LIGHTS_APPROACH_SCALAR=.9
//RUNWAY_LIGHTS_STROBE_SCALAR=.9

This helped a lot for me, it sets the limit to framerates to 20, but you can´t go much higher if you don´t have a decent rig, if you want to do this trick....
You can try it out, but backup your .cfg first.... And the Runway lights settings are in my cfg, but yo shouldn´t change those, as it´s a matter of the textures you use. Just change the upper 3 values....

Hope it helps some of you... decreases texture loading times and puts FPS a bit up when using intense scenery or aircraft
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 8th, 2006 at 10:10am
Souichiro   Ex Member

 
Thanks all for the wonderfull tips! Anything more?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Nov 8th, 2006 at 9:27pm

Ijineda   Offline
Colonel
Vienna, Austria

Gender: male
Posts: 1007
*****
 
TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.500000 
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=8.500000 

those are responsible for the sharpness in the distance, right? but it doesnt seem to work for me...sometimes I try 4.500000, another time 10.00000 and I couldnt notice any difference. ???

another thing: I have a ATI 9600, but in my FS9.cfg is written:

[DISPLAY.Device.NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE.0]
Mode=800x600x32
MipBias=6
AntiAlias=1

That was my old graphic cards...and theres NO entry for a 9600.  strange thing is, that inside the menu of FS9 (Settings/Display/Hardware) it says "RADEON 9600 Series .0" 
Wheres the problem?
 

Intel Quad Core 2 Extreme Q6600 @ 2.60GHz - Radeon HD 4850 - P5N-D - 4 GB RAM
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Nov 8th, 2006 at 11:31pm
Jakemaster   Ex Member

 
Quote:
TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.500000 
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=8.500000 

those are responsible for the sharpness in the distance, right? but it doesnt seem to work for me...sometimes I try 4.500000, another time 10.00000 and I couldnt notice any difference. ???

another thing: I have a ATI 9600, but in my FS9.cfg is written:

[DISPLAY.Device.NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE.0]
Mode=800x600x32
MipBias=6
AntiAlias=1

That was my old graphic cards...and theres NO entry for a 9600.  strange thing is, that inside the menu of FS9 (Settings/Display/Hardware) it says "RADEON 9600 Series .0" 
Wheres the problem?


Change the CFG one or delete the CFG and make a new one (FS makes a new one automatically)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Nov 9th, 2006 at 4:35am

Mees   Offline
Colonel
Netherlands, the

Gender: male
Posts: 4041
*****
 
I have all maxed out and the .cfg exacly like what you guys posted, and i take at 1280X1024 so the detail shows very very far as you can see from my shots Smiley
 

...&&AMD Athlon 4200+ :: Gigabyte K8n-SLi :: 1GB RAM :: 7900GTX 512MB
&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Nov 9th, 2006 at 10:31am

Ijineda   Offline
Colonel
Vienna, Austria

Gender: male
Posts: 1007
*****
 
thanks, worked!  Cheesy

but again to those two lines:
TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.500000 
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=8.500000 

how comes the extended radius is the same one as the default one? shouldnt it be like 2 times bigger? searching the web, I also found this line:
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=4.500000 
with this value, is sais, everything will be sharp as hell. lesser value = sharper? or vice versa?
 

Intel Quad Core 2 Extreme Q6600 @ 2.60GHz - Radeon HD 4850 - P5N-D - 4 GB RAM
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Nov 9th, 2006 at 11:46am

Double_Farvel   Offline
Colonel
Champions League Winner!
New Jersey, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 1074
*****
 
I tried out these tips and my fs is looking better...thanks guys
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 9th, 2006 at 4:10pm

Alonso   Offline
Colonel
Love airliners...
Lima, Peru

Gender: male
Posts: 3326
*****
 
THANK YOU PEOPLE!

And thanks for this thread Soui! eveything looks great and fast!

EDIT: So I just opened FS and  Shocked surprise! here are the results.
http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=paywareshots;action=displa...

I think this is the real objective of the Studio, and it really helps!  Wink
« Last Edit: Nov 9th, 2006 at 6:25pm by Alonso »  

...
Core i5 2500k @ 3.8 - 8GB DDR3 - GTX 560 OC  - 60GB SSD - 1TB HDD - Cyborg V.1 stick
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 5:47am
Souichiro   Ex Member

 
Quote:
THANK YOU PEOPLE!

And thanks for this thread Soui! eveything looks great and fast!

EDIT: So I just opened FS and  Shocked surprise! here are the results.
http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=paywareshots;action=displa...

I think this is the real objective of the Studio, and it really helps!  Wink


NP man that's what the studio is for!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 9:45am

krigl   Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.

Gender: male
Posts: 8255
*****
 
Several nice tips in here, including the old cfg chestnut - could this go into the tutorial sticky?

My tips:

1. Much of the work is before flying: keep your wastepaper basket, temp internet files and desktop clear. Disable stuff from the tray on bottom right before starting, regularly defrag and do ad and spyware scans. Floss regularly and use soft toilet paper. All these things are basic to freeing up resources for your sim. If you don't do them, you should.

There's a lot more you can do - check out Nik's contributions from the FS Autostart thread in the FSX forum - this should also go into the Studio V tutorial section in my humble opinion. . I haven't tried it yet, but he has at least one positive item of feedback....

Check out Nik's tips here:

http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=FSX;action=display;num=116...

I've posted them in a seperate thread too so the maximum people get to see them.

2. Do the limiting visibility with fog thing, or Jake's reduce unlimited distance thing, to avoid stepped, hard horizons. 30 km visibility is probably the best most pilots get, I would imagine, anyway, even on a clear day. Do the cfg tweak too, of course.

3. If you don't know how to/don't want to optimise performance for the sim, or you do it and it doesn't help, then you can fall back on the old 'fly at low detail, get to a good positon, crank up the settings, wait for all to load, then shoot' trick. That's what I used to do... and probably what I'll be doing when I start running FSX in 8 months or so...

I don't expect there's anything new for you in what I've posted, but you never know.... Smiley

Cheers

krigl
 

If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 3:24pm

thebrelon   Offline
Colonel
life is too short, have
fun!!
france

Gender: male
Posts: 949
*****
 
did you try nick's tweak? not that I don't trust him, I actually followed his advices many times and never have been disapointed, but just to have more feedbacks...

vince
 

...&&laptop: kenitec D900TV&&Pentium 4 3.4gHz HT&&4Gb corsair DDR II 533MHZ&&2x 60Gb Hard drive&&Nvidia geforce 6800  DDR3 256 Mb
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 4:25pm

krigl   Offline
Colonel
Flightsim did me in.

Gender: male
Posts: 8255
*****
 
Quote:
did you try nick's tweak? not that I don't trust him, I actually followed his advices many times and never have been disapointed, but just to have more feedbacks...

vince


I haven't had time - might not be till Xmas as my system runs relatively ok so far. But I definitely intend to, as I'm sure it will help a lot... I posted a seperate thread in here about it so that people with more time could find the tweaks and try them out, but it's dissappeared - someone removed it, don't know why  ???
 

If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 5:26pm
Nick N   Ex Member

 
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_LEVELS=1242456

That is a garbage setting... it defaults to 1

It should only be raised if you are using what is known as buffer mesh however you can also try a value of 4, no more


TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.500000  
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=8.500000  


These are tricky and based on the CPU/memory/motherboard and Video card. What works for one system, does NOT work on another.

For everything @ x800xt or above, and a decent processor/memory rig set to:

TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=9.9
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=9.0

Lower cards/systems must experiment with these as they can make or break a distance image and how the sim runs

TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.5
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=8.5

TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=8.5
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=4.5

TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=6.0  
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=4.0



UPPER_FRAMERATE_LIMIT=

ATI-Nvida very low-end cards lock at 20-22, medium cards lock at 22-24, high end cards, including SLI, lock at 24-28

NOTE: 7900GTX 512 and the newer cards 28, everything else @ 24

Live it, learn it, do it


TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=100  
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=10

That is actually a bit too high for most cards but for low end cards it -may- work better than reducing it. .

This is also VERY system driven. Rule of thumb to start experimenting..

medium-low cards such as ATI 9800xt should run

TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=100 // possibly 110-80  
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=6

All others up to 7900GTX:

TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=160  // reduce to 120 if stutters occur
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=8


SLI and power rigs with huge texture memory:

TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=160-180
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=10



Very low end cards AND cards with less than 128mb of memory should never attempt the TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD setting. Just eliminate that line and raise TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT= to between 180-260



Pan Rate is always 600-700



AA in the sim is ALWAYS OFF
ATI = Mip level is never higer than 4. Nvidia mip detail can be raised to max if the drivers are set up right.
Render to texture is ALWAYS enabled.



Low end systems must be cleaned up and set up right in Windows or you will always be fighting an uphill battle.

Windows install and driver install, knowing HOW to do that correctly will have a huge impact on how well a low end system runs.

THIS SECTION DEALS WITH INSTALLING WINDOWS AND YOUR SYSTEM DRIVERS.  

IF YOU DID NOT INSTALL YOUR DRIVERS IN THE CORRECT ORDER  

motherboard (chipset) – processor - network – sound – all other devices and LAST the video card

THERE COULD BE A DRIVER CONFLICT IN YOUR SYSTEM.

IN ORDER TO CORRECT SUCH CONFLICTS IN A SYSTEM THAT ALREADY HAS WINDOWS INSTALLED IT REQUIRES ALL DRIVERS BE COMPLETELY REMOVED AND THEN REINSTALLED. THE SYSTEM MUST BE REBOOTED AFTER EACH INDIVIDUAL DRIVER IS UNINSTALLED, THEN FOLLOW THE GUIDE BELOW TO REINSTALL THE DRIVERS.

-------------------------------------------------------------

I placed reminders below about updated drivers. It is always best to go to the websites for the motherboard chipset, processor, sound, NIC, video card core and all the other devices you have in your system to obtain the latest versions of the drivers so you have them ready for a clean install of Windows.

Here is the basic list you should follow when installing Windows. You may already know this or most of it however the BIOS and Windows settings that get your system hopping are secondary to the install process.  

You should make sure you have the latest BIOS installed for your system and makes sure the BIOS is set up correctly (NO OVERCLOCKING) before installing Windows.

Always install Windows on a NTFS format. FAT32 is worthless for performance and security.
 
 1.
Install Windows. When complete and at the new desktop wait about 3-5 minutes and simply reboot. This ensures anything that may have been caught in the buffers and did not complete during the first run, will finish.
 
 2.
Install the motherboard (chipset) drivers.  
 
 Reboot after install.
 

NOTE: If you have a processor driver from AMD or Intel, install it after the motherboard driver has been installed and you have rebooted the system...


NOTE: FOR DUAL CORE PROCESSORS…
AMD: Install the latest AMD Dual Core Processor Driver, reboot… Install the latest Dual Core Optimizer, reboot…

INTEL: Check with the Intel website to confirm there is/ is not a processor driver for your CPU

BOTH INTEL AND AMD:
Install the Microsoft Dual Core Hotfix for WindowsXP and make the following registry edit. If the THROTTLE key is not present, create it and in the right pane create the dword value: PerfEnablePackageIdle

Set it to 1

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Throttle]
"PerfEnablePackageIdle"=dword:00000001


Close Regedit and reboot.

 3.
If necessary, install network drivers. Some NIC drivers are found automatically by Windows however if not, install them now. You may want to check and see if an update is available for them at the manufactures website. Reboot
 
 4.
Install your sound card drivers… you may wish to check to see if an update is available before installing. Reboot
 
 5.
Install all other hardware drivers (EXCEPT VIDEO) one by one and reboot between installs.. Again it is always best to check the manufactures website for updates to make sure you have the latest drivers installed.
 
 6.
Leave out the video drivers till last… believe it or not Windows and MS Office updates can cause video driver issues and it is best to install the video drivers LAST after the system has been completely updated from Microsoft. If you use Microsoft Office, install it now.
 

 7.
Go to Windows Update and install the WU software for detection, reboot as directed. Go back to Windows update and download and ONLY install ALL the critical updates offered. Reboot as directed. Go back to Windows update and repeat the CRITICAL update install until ALL critical updates have been installed. Go to Office Update and install ALL the updates offered for Microsoft Office.
 
NOTE: If you install MICROSOFT UPDATE from the Windows Update website it will update both Office and Windows at the same time eliminating the need to go to the two different web sites.

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT WINDOWS XP SP2
If your Windows Installation CD does not come with SP2 and you must updated from the web, MAKE SURE YOU REBOOT TWICE AFTER SP2 IS INSTALLED before going back to Windows update to continue the update process.
 
 8.
At Windows update you want to look at the RECOMMENDED updates. The Net Framework 1.1 and 2.0 is being required for many FS9 and driver packages, install it. Install whatever update you would like from that list however you must reboot and go back to Windows update AGAIN to verify any critical updates for the software you installed from the recommended software list. Keep going back to Windows update until you get everything and make sure to reboot whenever the Microsoft system instructs.

NOTE: I highly recommend you NOT install any driver updates Microsoft offers from Windows Update unless you KNOW for a fact the driver is needed and is a good one. Microsoft driver updates have been known to trash a system or cause problems with the device they were meant to update. It is always best to get driver updates from the manufacture of the device, not Microsoft.
 
9.
Once you have all Office and WU components installed, install the video drivers. You should go to website for the card, either ATI or Nvidia and get the latest driver. I never use the CD because usually what is on it is old and the software it comes with is trash.
 
When complete, reboot. Let the system sit at the desktop for a few minutes after that reboot and reboot again.
 
 10.
Set up your video drivers.  
 
 11.
Install all other software. Anything you need or use EXCEPT FS9.  
 
 12.
Install Antivirus software. NOD32 is the BEST. You can’t get better protection however if you cannot afford NOD32... AVG or AVAST will work however you will NOT be as well protected.

THROW AWAY NORTON PRODUCTS AND MacAfee.. THEY WILL KILL YOUR SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

....and you DONT need any extra firewall software, just the Windows based firewall. DONT be fooled into putting zone alarm and other crap into your system for security. Those programs SLOW your computer and therefore they will SLOW your FS9 performance.

SECURITY:
AV = NOD32, AVG or AVAST

NOD32 is the ONLY AV on the market that boasts a 100% virus, trojan and browser attack kill rate.

Firewall = Windows Firewall (as long as you have SP2 installed)
Spybots S&D
AdAware

That’s it.. Anything else is a waste of your CPU and memory.  
 
Now that everything but FS9 is installed… you are ready for that.  Make sure FS9, all your add-ons and all your software is installed and working before continuing. Do not be concerned if FS9 or your other software does not seem to run smooth at this point… you’re just getting started.


NOTE: MAKE SURE WHEN YOU INSTALL THE FS9.1 UPDATE YOU PLACE THE UPDATER FILE INSIDE THE

C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROSOFT GAMES\FLIGHT SIMULATOR 9

..FOLDER before you run the updater. If you do not do that you WILL corrupt your .dll files in the modules folder.



Your system is now installed… HOWEVER... your system is a mess from all that installing work and it needs to be properly cleaned up, set up for performance and optimized.

AGP DRIVER UPDATES:
REMEMBER.. AGP driver replacement REQUIRES the motherboard AGP driver be removed right after the video driver and then reinstalled BEFORE the new video drivers go in!!!!!!!!!!!


Proceed to my cleanup post

you may also wish to review this thread:
http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=COF;action=display;num=116...

« Last Edit: Nov 10th, 2006 at 7:48pm by N/A »  
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 6:01pm

Sytse   Offline
Colonel
Virtual Red Arrows
The Netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 3590
*****
 
Cheers! Do these great tips also apply to other versions of FS?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Nov 10th, 2006 at 6:19pm
Nick N   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Cheers! Do these great tips also apply to other versions of FS?



Windows and driver settings apply to any system for any software... the FS9 settings, for the most part, can not be imported into FSX

FSX is a completely different animal and when I get time I will post a low-medium config file for people to try

EDIT: The 4 most overlooked areas by people is the hardware types, (all of it) how it is installed on the motherboard (especially memory), the BIOS and how Windows is set up with correct driver installs and then properly cleaned on the disk.

If one or all of those items are out of sync... you will always fight a uphill battle with any MSFS product.

Thats why you may see some people with lesser hardware post things work well and most post they dont... also, there is the issue of frustration caused by low grade hardware. No body wants to fly and not see the eye-candy and a large number of complaints stem from people trying to see the eye candy with hardware they have no business trying to push... then get depressed from the results.


also.. Go to the DIRECTX website and download the lastest web update tool and update DirectX properly.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Nov 11th, 2006 at 8:45pm

ramsa329   Offline
Colonel
FS-GS

Posts: 1928
*****
 
I have been asked to post on this forum by Souichiro.

I don't really wish to comment on any of Nick's excellent research except to say that much of what he says has merit and much of what he says is by fs-gs standards a bit off.

As he has warned any tweak can have different affects on each individual machine and should be approached with caution.

According to our work and studies over the last 4 years and with well now close to 3000 clients we have found the following:

The issue of pan_rate which can be found under {Controls] in your .cfg is tied directly to texture_bandwidth_mult which can be found under [Display]

The original ratio 60:40 between the numbers should be preserved (as much as possible).

Low end and even some higher end Nvidia cards and almost all ATI cards would be  set at 700:240
with the Pan_Rate @ 700 and texture_bandwidth_mult @ 240. Depending on how the user sees his/her texture loading,

This would maintain the ratio and give texture loading times a greater balance with the panning rate.

Higher end Nvidia video cards can sustain a 900:400 Ratio. Anything above this cannot be read accurately.

It is important to understand what video card manufacturers mean by their sales codes.

In most cases higher performance cards are denoted by an "X"

So for instance a 7900 GT while excellent would fall behind a 7900GTX.

Amount of memory is overvalued in relationship to Fs9 oftentimes memory type is more relevant.

For instance while 512MB GDDR2 is nice it is far less effective than 256 MB GDDR3.

Prices of video cards will generally reflect this.

The real issue is the balance between the CPU and the GPU.

For example if you are running let's say an intel P4 2.6- 3.0GHZ HT processor it would be a waste of your time to run a 7900GTX and you would be better off with a an ATI or Nvidia card with better balance to that processor such as a 6600GT or 6800GT or the ATI equivilent.

The same would be true of an AMD processor of anywhere between 3200+ to a 3800+

As to other ,cfg settings i would have to differ slightly with Nick.

On higher end video cards:

TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=9.000000  
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=9.000000
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_LEVELS=1 or 4 which as Nick said depends upon if you are using "buffer mesh" or not.

When and if you see "blurries" or if you are using an ATI card regardless of its power you should set these to:  

TERRAIN_DEFAULT_RADIUS=9.500000  
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_RADIUS=4.500000
TERRAIN_EXTENDED_LEVELS=1

Remember that these are connected to your texture_bandwidth _mult and pan_rate which I discussed above.

TERRAIN_MAX_VERTEX_LEVEL This number can change dependent upon sceneries or mesh that is installed a good starting point is 20.

All of the following settings are controlled by sliders or on/off switches within the sim and should not be touched in the .cfg

Turning them on or off is done from within the sim.

[SCENERY]  
IMAGE_COMPLEXITY=5  
DYNAMIC_SCENERY=1 //this is extended autogen, try turning it off
DYN_SCN_DENSITY=5 // also try 1
DAWN_DUSK_SMOOTHING=1  
SUNGLARE=1  
LENSFLARE=1  
 
UPPER_FRAMERATE_LIMIT should never be touched.

If you wish to test framerates than you should test them at the default airport with the default Cessna 172.

1) Turn off all weather

2) Fly over Boeing Field at 2000ft trimmed out

3) Pause the sim and go to spot view. Do not change the distance from the plane

4) Turn on your framerate counter and take readings from all 6 outside views left, right ,front , back. above ,below.

5) Write them down.

6) Now go to 2D cockpit and do forward ,left, right and back.

7) Write them down

9) Now go to VC and do the same thing.

10) Add them all together and divide by 14

This will give you your average.

Now reduce or increase that number by 10-15% and you will have your perfect target framerate.

Now you can add weather and traffic.

As to Nick's machine tweaks I will not make any comment here at all.

Fs-Gs has its own system which we have found to be very successful.

Let's just say we agree to disagree !!!

That being said I would caution users to be careful of some of the information.

There is never a need to replace AGP drivers on the MoBo before installing new AGP video drivers. Never period !!!!!!! Such advise should have been considered more carefully before being posted.

If you know how to update your Bios and chipset than do so especially if you are changing video cards. Always be cautious and work slowly and carefully!!

Never ever turn off services in your primary profile. If you wish to do so create a secondary profile under hardware profiles in system properties.

I cannot stress this enough.

Registry Mechanic is a dangerous tool and should be used with extreme caution as should any registry cleaner.

Registry mechanic however is especially tricky.  Be Careful !!!!!

There is absolutely no benefit to compacting the registry. It doesn't hurt but it doesn't help either.

There is of course much much more concerning video card settings memory drivers etc...............................

If you want to hear more about these or FSX (which we are already doing for our clients) let me know.

I hope this will be of some value.

Ramsa329

www.fs-gs.com
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 5:27am
Nick N   Ex Member

 
What it all boils down to is whatever works best for your system and as long as it is not harmful, do it.

There is more than one way to make a system run good and without issues. I take the engineering approach which goes by the book, the designers of the operating system and the software being used.

If a method is found that produces desired results consistently and has worked for years on end by all means, stick with it.  

I have never posted anything on these forums that was inaccurate in the slightest or that would ever harm a system in any way. I have also never posted anything or suggested anyone do anything that would have absolutely no effect on their system either.

The user is the most dangerous thing a computer system has to deal with. It is usually their error with improper procedures, setting something up wrong or implementing a mass of useless tweaks that end up causing more trouble than they fix and makes it impossible to see/know when a good tweak is found, if it actually did anything.

And I will add one last item... If your not sure of what you are doing and do not feel comfortable changing settings on your system, dont. Seek professional engineering help.

For every 15 tweaks you see on the internet or hear about, usually only 1 has any merit... and that 1 only works if the rest of the system is properly set up for it.



« Last Edit: Nov 12th, 2006 at 6:54am by N/A »  
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 11:42am

ramsa329   Offline
Colonel
FS-GS

Posts: 1928
*****
 
Nick,

This is not personal. I was asked to comment which as you know I generally do not do.

For the most I agree with everything you said in your last post.

My issue with posting technical posts such as yours, which as I have already said contains a lot of excellent research and makes a highly valuable package, is the same issue that I have when I am asked to post my own findings.

Most personal users do not understand fully what they are doing and non-personal support is very indirect.

It can lead to many many critical errors.

This is why fs-gs exists. Through our system we can deal with the client on a one to one basis and ensure that he/she will neither misunderstand or take a "wrong turn".

I did not mean to imply that what you have posted was dangerous because of its content.

I too am an engineer with many many years of experience and with too many certifications to mention here. 

But even as an engineer eventhough I find your approach of "going by the book " and  "engineering" interesting reading I also have issues with it which is natural since my approach is based on an interpersonal 1 to1 client and machine interaction.

It is my belief that this "engineering" and corresponding lack of ability to think beyond the box "principle" is one of the reasons that ACES has done such a miserable job with FSX. They couldn't see the forest for the trees and they missed the point altogether on many many levels

Fs-Gs have found that it is often much better to think outside the "box" when dealing with clients and to cut back on the "technocratic" aspect of computing.

Both systems use intensive hardware testing (I test for both Nvidia and ATI) and product testing ( almost every add-on product available for Fs9 and now for FSX)

But sometimes you have to get "down and dirty" with clients as I am sure you do with all of yours.

1 on 1 to deal with their fears,  their personalities, their desires, their machines and their budgets.

A forum is not the place to do this effectively and in that lies the danger.







 
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 3:46pm
Nick N   Ex Member

 
None of my posts contain research. They contain a methodology which has been practiced by professionals for years with changes to the specifics in order to accommodate present day logistics with respect to Windows, hardware and driver engineering.

I do not have clients for services, nor will I in the future.

What I posted was not an advertisement for business or placed on the forums to attract customers.

It was placed here to help, nothing more... and without any catch, at all.

Anyone who has used the method I outlined properly knows the results. I do not fine tune anyone’s system because if they have at least a minimum spec of good hardware (ie; the right amount of memory and a good video adapter)  installed and use the proper approach, there is no need to go to all sorts of over the top, outside the box setup methods.

Those with medium-low grade hardware can get better results but they also must accept its limitations and that there is no miracle cure to make it run better. One must accept the limits of the hardware once a system has been properly set up. Looks and performance are 2 different things. I can have a sim that looks like I am running the best hardware money can buy in a screenshot, and in reality I jacked up the settings to get the shot @ 5-10FPS. There is no practical sim function to screenshots which people sometimes forget.

Electronic circuits do not function outside the box, they function in a very controlled and measured environment and must remain inside the box or they stop working.

There are many ways to move variables around in a mathematical formula (theoretical or otherwise) and still obtain the same final answer however, as in electronics, the shorter the formula, the faster the result.

Add-ons are an entirely different subject. That is where an intimate understanding of an add-on can make or break a sim and that is also where ‘outside the box’ experience comes in, is invaluable and should be sought out. Undertstanding textures and the affects of load variables from the configuration files is outside the box experience which can not be obtained from a forum.

I have no negative comments about the FSX team. I think they did the best they could with what they had to work with. I also believe they made some mistakes and hope they are addressing them properly.

They have my full support.


Nick
« Last Edit: Nov 12th, 2006 at 5:36pm by N/A »  
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 10:32pm

ramsa329   Offline
Colonel
FS-GS

Posts: 1928
*****
 
Well.....................................

Why am I not surprised.

I knew that the moment that I would post all the B*ll S**t would start.

"What I posted was not an advertisement for business or placed on the forums to attract customers."

I don't give a rat's a** whether anyone from these forums uses my services or not. I want them to know that there are alternatives to choose from.

I refer to my service because it's the base I work from

"None of my posts contain research. They contain a methodology which has been practiced by professionals for years with changes to the specifics in order to accommodate present day logistics with respect to Windows, hardware and driver engineering."

Very well written nice languaging meaningless but nice

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh......................I'm not surprised that there is no research.

By the way which "professionals" are you referring to? The ones you pick out, God's final word?

I find your self-aggrandizing language to be obnoxious and if you did run a computer service I would be out the door at the speed of light.

"I can have a sim that looks like I am running the best hardware money can buy in a screenshot, and in reality I jacked up the settings to get the shot @ 5-10FPS. There is no practical sim function to screenshots which people sometimes forget."

So...........................Not to someone who can identify that it doesn't and I and many others can identify that "trick" easily. There will always be signs for those who look.

"Those with medium-low grade hardware can get better results but they also must accept its limitations and that there is no miracle cure to make it run better. One must accept the limits of the hardware once a system has been properly set up"

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh no kidding really. Such enlightenment

"I do not fine tune anyone’s system because if they have at least a minimum spec of good hardware (ie; the right amount of memory and a good video adapter)"

What the h*ll are you talking about:

How much memory which company which speed which latency for which Mobo which processor which sim which video card which company what's the difference between the companies for laptops is it the same and on and on and on.

That's exactly what makes you so potentially dangerous to a user.

Now to the next bit:

Your a** kissing of ACES not withstanding.

"I have no negative comments about the FSX team."

I on the other hand run (very well) and love FSX and I can still see what happened.

Obviously unlike you I know how to differentiate, criticize................... and make it work.

I'd rather spend my time working on solutions to FSX's obvious (at least to everybody but you) problems.

"I also believe they made some mistakes and hope they are addressing them properly."

No kidding really? Well at least you have hope. I'm a proof man myself.

As just two examples: It would have taken a blind person not to have seen the "desert" textures or at the very least a technocrat who could only see the box.

Or the water in the UK would be laughable if it weren't so sad

They should have sent a fix out immediately!!!!!!!!

However sadly they did not.

But thankfully other little non- technocrats without the Microsoft budget like Cloud9 and a recent terrain.cfg to "fix" the water in the UK and many others.

"The best they could with what they had to work with"

What a joke.

Obviously you've never worked for Microsoft or on second thought from the way you write maybe you did.

"Electronic circuits do not function outside the box, they function in a very controlled and measured environment and must remain inside the box or they stop working."

What a load of horse manure !!!  Controls change as do environments constantly.

With this kind of thinking in place the future would look very grim.

As I write this little bit of waste of time people all over the world are working to break those boundaries.

But this isn't about any of that it's about "real people" who invest their time and money and if I were one of them listening to you I would be very doubtful.

You remind me of someone from the "GEEK SQUAD" at Best Buy.

You wear the uniform talk the language walk the walk but in the bottom line...........................well..........................duh

I'm sure that you can convince kids that what you post here is "just to help" but in truth it's about YOUR EGO you love the spotlight.

I hear them rushing drooling and stumbling to your defense now.

Don't worry I'm leaving I won't push you off the hill.

You're the King.

Keep it

"In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is King"

You hold that honor.

Good night Goodbye

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Nov 12th, 2006 at 10:49pm
Nick N   Ex Member

 
My gosh Michael... I -am- quite surprised.


actually.. Im not.  You said this was not personal yet that is exactly what you have turned it into and what it was about when you posted from the beginning.

I am sorry if I have in some way upset you.

Thank you for posting back.















 
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 2:10am

ramsa329   Offline
Colonel
FS-GS

Posts: 1928
*****
 
Upset me you call that upset.

Oh I doubt that.

What an abysmally low threshhold you must have to rejoin in such a  manner

Do you like the languaging? Do you need a dictionary?

More like bored me really.

While cute your reply is really far too inane to upset me.

Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!!

I was wondering have you succeeded in removing your nose yet?

It must have been buried quite deep during the kissing

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 2:19am
Nick N   Ex Member

 
No sir, I haven’t

Have you managed or succeeded to enroll in anger management, perhaps AA or some other group where you may receive proper care?


Goodnite and sleep well.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 3:53am

ramsa329   Offline
Colonel
FS-GS

Posts: 1928
*****
 
Goodnight Nick

I hope you have your security blanket with you...............

and your Teddy.

and don't forget GOD loves you the best

Oooops I forgot you are God

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 7:40am

Mees   Offline
Colonel
Netherlands, the

Gender: male
Posts: 4041
*****
 
Guys, please...
 

...&&AMD Athlon 4200+ :: Gigabyte K8n-SLi :: 1GB RAM :: 7900GTX 512MB
&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #30 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 10:12am

Clipper   Offline
Global Moderator
Clearly Canadian

Posts: 8861
*****
 
...
ahhh...much better

 

...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print