Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Reason for NY Planecrash 11th Oct.
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Reason for NY Planecrash 11th Oct. (Read 233 times)
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 2:56pm
Arnimon
Offline
Colonel
Whats up Bugs?
Germany
Gender:
Posts: 345
Today i read a notice in our Local Newspaper.
The Planecrash from 11th Oct. in NY was caused by a slight crosswind. Baseball Profi Cory Lidle tried to make a turn over the River and was pushed aside about 120m in the direction of the Building by a slight Crosswind. To get the turn succesful under these conditions it would have been necessary to turn in a very sharp way so there was a great possibilty for stalling.
It looks like chicken,smells like chicken,tastes like chicken,but when Chuck Norris says its Beef...then damnit...its Beef!!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 3:11pm
TSC.
Offline
Colonel
The older I get, the better
I was...
Torquay, Devon, England.
Gender:
Posts: 5132
Apparently he was making a steep turn at about 700ft ASL, which is very low for steep turns aswell, unfortunately they left themselves no room for error, be that by stalling in a steep turn or by being blown wide by the wind - I saw a video about it, reconstructed by crash investigators in a sim (FS9 if I remember correctly), although I thought about posting a link (in the interest of aviation), I felt that it might not be appreciated by all of us.
Cheers,
TSC.
'Only two things are infinite.......The Universe and Human stupidity........and I'm not too sure about the Universe' - Einstein
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 3:35pm
Arnimon
Offline
Colonel
Whats up Bugs?
Germany
Gender:
Posts: 345
Quote:
I saw a video about it, reconstructed by crash investigators in a sim (FS9 if I remember correctly), although I thought about posting a link (in the interest of aviation), I felt that it might not be appreciated by all of us.
Might be so,but,to speak for me,i found the news in the Papers of some interest.
It looks like chicken,smells like chicken,tastes like chicken,but when Chuck Norris says its Beef...then damnit...its Beef!!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 3:56pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
The plane wasn't "pushed aside"... they were just not far enough towards the other side of the river to make a 180 safely in that wind without banking continuously at about 54 degrees. Supposedly witnesses saw that the initial angle of bank was not that high, and although they banked more as they got close to the building, it was too late.
The VFR exclusion extended from one bank of the river to the other, but before they turned, they were cruising almost straigtht up the middle. Would've been better off doglegging to the east to the very edge of the Class B first before turning around...
The altitude of a steep turn makes no difference whatsoever, except to the extent that if you screw up and stall in the turn, having enough altitude to recover would be helpful.
But they didn't stall... they just cut the turn too close to an obstruction and struck it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 3:59pm
TSC.
Offline
Colonel
The older I get, the better
I was...
Torquay, Devon, England.
Gender:
Posts: 5132
Quote:
Might be so,but,to speak for me,i found the news in the Papers of some interest.
I find it interesting aswell, we can all learn from the mistakes of others through things such as crash investigations, nor do I have any problems talking about it - the reason I didn't post the link was because I do not live in America, so I really have no idea how popular or famous Cory Lidle was/is.
The sad thing is that if they had made the turn the other way, then things would probably have been fine.
Quote:
The altitude of a steep turn makes no difference whatsoever, except to the extent that if you screw up and stall in the turn, having enough altitude to recover would be helpful.
But they didn't stall...
Hi Sean, my point was that, although they didn't stall in the turn, if they had, then they would've had a very difficult time correcting it safely from 700ft ASL. I think it's just good practice to leave steep turns to slightly higher altitudes, at least if it all goes wrong you've still got room to make ammends.
Cheers,
TSC.
'Only two things are infinite.......The Universe and Human stupidity........and I'm not too sure about the Universe' - Einstein
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 4:36pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Quote:
The sad thing is that if they had made the turn the other way, then things would probably have been fine.
Hi Sean, my point was that, although they didn't stall in the turn, if they had, then they would've had a very difficult time correcting it safely from 700ft ASL. I think it's just good practice to leave steep turns to slightly higher altitudes, at least if it all goes wrong you've still got room to make ammends.
Cheers,
TSC.
Roger...
True, they could have gone a little higher and still been legal, and with a little more thought, being right in the middle and knowing the wind was out of the east at better than 10 knots, they'd have made a decent 180 to the right... might even have kept it inside the exclusion with that wind. Not that it really would matter- I'd rather deal with having busted the airspace than flying into a building!
But one of the problems with that corridor was that they were (loosely) following the unwritten protocol that northbound flights travel on the east side, then turn to the left to go south on the west side. This is also the case over the Hudson, but it works much better there, because it's twice as wide.
Although many, many similar flights were made quite safely in that narrow box, I'm kind of relieved that they've shut it down. It was a trap, not worth the trouble of getting out of it safely.
Although I'm ticked-off that they waited until people got killed...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 6:21pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
But they didn't stall... they just cut the turn too close to an obstruction and struck it.
Mmm - two things strike me here. Either increase the angle of bank to avoid the building (maybe a little daunting low down for a low time PPL), or more sensibly roll off the bank (quickly if necessary) and avoid it?
Bizarre incident indeed...
Quote:
Hi Sean, my point was that, although they didn't stall in the turn, if they had, then they would've had a very difficult time correcting it safely from 700ft ASL. I think it's just good practice to leave steep turns to slightly higher altitudes, at least if it all goes wrong you've still got room to make ammends.
It was a Cirrus IIRC? I'm sure that a steep turn (talking 60deg AoB) could quite happily be performed with an adequate handful of power. Again, maybe it would be a question of experience - but he was flying with quite an experienced pilot beside him IIRC too...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 6:48pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
There is a lot about it that doesn't make sense, without assuming that they made too many assumptions.
As for aborting the last part of the turn and rolling out to the west, that building is not the only big one nearby... I can only assume that once they realized it wasn't working as planned, they chose to bank more, but not soon enough. Who knows?
They may have even had a moment of fighting over the controls; it's been known to happen, even with two very experienced pilots.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Nov 6
th
, 2006 at 8:17pm
Brett_Henderson
Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB
Gender:
Posts: 3593
I'm going to show my ignorance (and laziness.. but it always is more fun to ask stuff here of SimV's incredibly diverse and knowledgable members)..
Is that corridor closed completely to GA ? Can you file a flight plan to sight-see up through there .. that would allow for a safe and reasonable penetration of airspace ?
I know it's only Charlie airspace here in Columbus.. And KOSU's Delta airspace (along with two other Delta airspaces) is nestled sung under it.. But if you want/need to sight-see or photograph stuff; all you need do is contact Columbus approach and declare your intentions.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.