Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
What Ive heard (Read 1865 times)
Oct 6th, 2006 at 4:43pm

cavity   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 388
*****
 
From what Ive read and viewed at numerous other sites, it appears that most computers will run FSX well without blurries and stutters, even on modest machines. The big problem posted by most  is the autogen, which seems to drop frames from 50 to 75%, which is obviously a large amount.  Most have reported great scenery above 1500 ft even with autogen turned off, so if the autogen issue can be resolved, we may be in for some smooth flying, something Ive never really achieved with FS9 and my system.  Todd
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 4:53pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
Quote:
........ something Ive never really achieved with FS9 and my system.


Me either Todd, me either.

If it works better I'll be amazed. 

best,

.................john
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 4:56pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Considering the number of members that said they have it already, things have gone suspiciously quiet. Roll Eyes
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 5:06pm

cavity   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 388
*****
 
John, I remember way back when 2004 came out and our systems were almost identical and we both shared the exact same issues.  You have gone on to upgrade, something I am waiting to do when Vista and DX10 come along.  I have read many of your posts seeking the exact same thing I have always desired,  a stutter free performance, which never seems to happen even with good frames.  I have settled on the fact that I wont achieve it with this version on my system, but FSX and a new system will offer hope for a resolution.   Heres wishing you and all the other members good luck with the new version!  Todd
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 5:20pm

Splat762   Offline
Colonel
IYAOYAS
NAS Whidbey Island, WA. USA

Gender: male
Posts: 760
*****
 
Quote:
Considering the number of members that said they have it already, things have gone suspiciously quiet. Roll Eyes



Funny, I've been thinking the same thing Hagar.  Wink I would think people are more anxious to show stuff off...
 

Naval Aviation - Fight to fly, fly to fight, fight to win.
&&
...
Sig by Stormtropper/9thSimplex
&&&&
Aviation Ordnanceman 1st Class, U.S. Navy - Putting warheads on foreheads since 1995
&&&&
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/splatcodsig.jpg
&&&&&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 5:25pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
Yup Todd,...... if anyone looks back a the early fs2004 stuff here on SimV they can see the documentation for the "search for the holy grail" that a lot of us were on...... and unfortunately never found.  Wink

As to FSX... I don't plan to RUN it until I can create a killer gaming specific machine.  Might BUY the new sim  soon....just to see what it DOES do on this machine for comparison.  But this one won't run fs9 well,.... so I am pretty sure that FSX will only run with stuff turned way down.  

As I have said about fs2004... the only place the sim performance matters for me is on short final coming into a highly detailed airport with 100% AI travffic running and real world weather...... and getting stutter free fast framerates right THERE (consistent 25-30 fps).  I can care less about smooth 60 fps at 30,000 over the ocean running on autopilot.  I GET that kind of stuff.  It is meaningless.

It is about flyability combined with graphics for me.  Flying the plane is an awful lot about take offs and landings.

Just like fs2004.... if I go out and buy the program, what I am WANTING to buy is ALL that the marketing promotes.  If I have to turn off the new features... then why am I buying it?

My last "go around" with two machines and two video cards trying to get fs9 running tells me that I will have to wait, and that I will have to spend a BUNCH of bucks to get 100% of everything out of FSX.  And it does not make sense to buy an machine now.... with Vista and DX10 not yet released.  The software price for the sim is the LEAST of my worries  Wink.

I figure I am at least a year down the road on being able to run FSX.  Sad.......... but likely.  

Good luck with your efforts too.  Smiley   Sigh........... here we go again.


best,

...................john


PS:  Hagar,... I too have noticed the lack of definitive info coming out yet from those that have it.  So far, the few screenshots I have seen have shown me that it is likely  that people are turning stuff way, WAY down.
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 5:46pm

Mobius   Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin

Posts: 4369
*****
 
Quote:
Considering the number of members that said they have it already, things have gone suspiciously quiet. Roll Eyes

What do you think we've been doing. Grin

I've got some shots of FSX HERE, and from what I can tell, I have a moderate amount of autogen set, and I can still get ~20-25 FPS over wilderness areas, and ~15-20 FPS over cities and populated areas.  But you can't really expect to run it at max settings the day you get it, so I am very happy with how well it runs for me now. Wink
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 6:02pm

Mobius   Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin

Posts: 4369
*****
 
Alright, here we go, I've got autogen and scenery complexity set to "Dense", and there are still two more settings above that, and here are a couple of shots of what I was getting...

...
...
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 7:51pm

hypostomus2000   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 31
*****
 
I think FSX wasn't designed to run on *todays* top end machines. It's been programmed with a couple of years stretch to give the product shelf longevity. Personally I wasn't expecting it to run at it's maximum capability with my computer. But I know when I upgrade it'll still have something to give me in reward.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 9:04pm

gijake   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 1061
*****
 
Quote:


Stop hijacking threads!  Especialy with oversized screen shots!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 10:18pm

wji   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 1644
*****
 
" . . . they have it already, things have gone suspiciously quiet."
This is still October 6th is it not?
FSX just came out today and this is my third post already. I didn't install it until 0000Z and it's only 0217Z now. give me a break!  Tongue

Here's two shots to hold you over . . .
...

...

I really don't have a lot to say about FSX because I've spent less than two hours on it -- but standby one . . .
 

... PhotoShop 7 user
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 10:23pm

KDSM   Offline
Colonel
SimV Forum Flyer

Gender: male
Posts: 1340
*****
 
Quote:
Considering the number of members that said they have it already, things have gone suspiciously quiet. Roll Eyes



This normally happens after a realease of a new sim
a flurry of posts when everybody says they got it and first impressions then it goes quiet for a week or two as they get down to seeing what they can or cant do then another flurry of post saying how it "sucks and they need to change"
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 10:27pm

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Quote:
This normally happens after a realease of a new sim
a flurry of posts when everybody says they got it and first impressions then it goes quiet for a week or two as they get down to seeing what they can or cant do then another flurry of post saying how it "sucks and they need to change"


This is an endless cycle that is as inevitable as death itself. There's nothing we can do to stop it so we all have to suck it up.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Oct 6th, 2006 at 11:49pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
Quote:
thats cuzz we are busy flyin around and in the multiplayer lounge. last time i was there there was 7 of us


The grammar. It makes me want to gouge out my eyes. Use correct spelling please, as noted in the registration form.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Oct 7th, 2006 at 3:56am
RollerBall   Ex Member

 
I'm holding my breath waiting for these screenies because without trying to upset anyone, I've not seen anything yet that looks better than FS9.

Reckon the only way anyone can get any kind of decent FR is with all the effects turned way down - but I remain to be convinced  Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print