Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
DX10 nVidia Card - Can it handle FSX? (Read 1151 times)
Sep 24th, 2006 at 12:15am

Ashton Lawson   Offline
Colonel
FS Water Configurator
Programmer
Phuket, Thailand

Gender: male
Posts: 1211
*****
 
You've probably all heard of the R600 and G80 graphics cards from ATi and nVidia, well I just found an article on nVidia's G80, kind of an old article, but the specs at the bottom make me cry. Cry

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=3177


For those of u who don't understand any of the specs at the bottom, its d@m goooooooooooooooooooooooood.....  To me.  To u, i dunno. Tongue
 

...&&FS Water Configurator+ has new modifications in the works, plus DirectX 10, Service Pack&&1, and Radeon HD 3+ Series support.
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Sep 24th, 2006 at 2:04am

vololiberista   Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia

Posts: 1042
*****
 
Quote:
You've probably all heard of the R600 and G80 graphics cards from ATi and nVidia, well I just found an article on nVidia's G80, kind of an old article, but the specs at the bottom make me cry. Cry

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=3177


For those of u who don't understand any of the specs at the bottom, its d@m goooooooooooooooooooooooood.....  To me.  To u, i dunno. Tongue


It would seem to be a little more powerful than my 440!!
Vololiberista
 

Andiamo in Italia&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Sep 24th, 2006 at 2:13am
Bindoe   Ex Member

 
Rofl. Some todays cards have faster memory Wink I'd expect the top and cards to have 2.2ghz GDDR4, then later on with the 8950 series maybe like 2.6ghz GDDR4.

Also a DX10 card will easily max out fsX, and a thirst gen DX10 card will easily max it out with mods Wink I doubt them specs are anything real, probably what they were aiming for...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Sep 25th, 2006 at 7:38am

ashaman   Offline
Colonel
I'm from Italy, errors
in my text are a given.
LIRN

Gender: male
Posts: 1752
*****
 
Quote:
It would seem to be a little more powerful than my 440!!
Vololiberista



Just a mite faster of my spanking new 6600gt, after all. Undecided

Grin Grin Grin
 

There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.&&&&At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".&&&&Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novice of Orbiter.&&&&Seen the GREAT service pack for FSX and its usefulness, really awaiting for FS11 to upgrade.&&&&AMD Athlon Xp 2400@2700&&MB Asus A7V8XX&&1Gb ram DDR 400 @ 333&&ASL Nvidia Geforce 6600gt 128Mb DDR3 AGP&&Creative Sound Blaster Live&&Windows XP Professional Sp2&&2 HD Maxtor 40Gb - 1 HD Maxtor 80Gb
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Sep 25th, 2006 at 11:21am

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Striker, you may see your system as damn gooooooood. But to us, that MX 440 can't even support DX9. Roll Eyes Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Sep 25th, 2006 at 12:15pm
Bindoe   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Striker, you may see your system as damn gooooooood. But to us, that MX 440 can't even support DX9. Roll Eyes Grin

I think he means:
Quote:
65nm
64 Shader pipelines (Vec4+Scalar)
32 TMU's
32 ROPs
128 Shader Operations per Cycle
800MHz Core
102.4 billion shader ops/sec
512GFLOPs for the shaders
2 Billion triangles/sec
25.6 Gpixels/Gtexels/sec
256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR4 Memory
57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
WGF2.0 Unified Shader

Grin
I expect ATI to out do Nvidia this time, as ATI already has experiance with the Xbox360.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Sep 25th, 2006 at 12:19pm

vololiberista   Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia

Posts: 1042
*****
 
Quote:
Striker, you may see your system as damn gooooooood. But to us, that MX 440 can't even support DX9. Roll Eyes Grin


My MX 440 runs DX9 perfectly well. It's just a question of upgrading the drivers for XP.
Vololiberista
 

Andiamo in Italia&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 12:40am
Bindoe   Ex Member

 
Quote:
My MX 440 runs DX9 perfectly well. It's just a question of upgrading the drivers for XP.
Vololiberista

Geforce 4s don't support shaders 2 among other things so they aren't fully DX9. All you're loosing is some effects though Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 3:38am

Ashton Lawson   Offline
Colonel
FS Water Configurator
Programmer
Phuket, Thailand

Gender: male
Posts: 1211
*****
 
Ah, thats what ur talking about.  No no, when i said at the bottom, i meant the bottom of the article I found.  Not my sig (otherwise i would've said my sig).
 

...&&FS Water Configurator+ has new modifications in the works, plus DirectX 10, Service Pack&&1, and Radeon HD 3+ Series support.
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 3:50am

Ashton Lawson   Offline
Colonel
FS Water Configurator
Programmer
Phuket, Thailand

Gender: male
Posts: 1211
*****
 
Also, Bindoe, nVidia hav expierience with the PlayStation 3, which is much better...  (no offence to MS and their XBox 360)

I think nVidia r gonna pull off DX10 better.  (Besides, SLi is better than Crossfire...)
 

...&&FS Water Configurator+ has new modifications in the works, plus DirectX 10, Service Pack&&1, and Radeon HD 3+ Series support.
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 4:18am
Bindoe   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Also, Bindoe, nVidia hav expierience with the PlayStation 3, which is much better...  (no offence to MS and their XBox 360)

I think nVidia r gonna pull off DX10 better.  (Besides, SLi is better than Crossfire...)

The Ps3s GPU is based of the Geforce 7 and dosn't have things like unified shaders (ATI is now experianced on Unified shaders). Wink

Oh, and the 2 terraflop thing isn't a good way to measure performance. In reality  the ps3s processor does less than half a terraflop, which is still great and better than the Xbox. But double the price, and then it looses to Kentsfield.

How is SLI better than Cross fire? As far as I know Crossfire works on all games while SLI works on only a few, as well as:
X1950XTX > 7900GTX
X850XTPE > 6800ultra
9800pro > fx 5900.

I do think Nvidia will, as always, do extremly good in the mid range sector though.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 5:03am

Ashton Lawson   Offline
Colonel
FS Water Configurator
Programmer
Phuket, Thailand

Gender: male
Posts: 1211
*****
 
Not to be sarcastic, but how many gpus can ATi support, cuz i know that nvidia can support 4.  (heard a rumor that they might go up another knotch, maybe six Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin)

Plus the arcitecture is better (dunno how, just read a review).
 

...&&FS Water Configurator+ has new modifications in the works, plus DirectX 10, Service Pack&&1, and Radeon HD 3+ Series support.
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 6:20am
Bindoe   Ex Member

 
ATI supports 2, Nvidia supports, like 8 or something with work stations Wink

But seriously, who buys 4 video cards? Kids with rich parents Smiley

As for archetecture, I don't know. The ATI 9800 can run new games on medium settings, while the Geforce
fx5900 cannot even run them. Why? Because the fx series have terrible pixel shading performance.

The X8x0 series is OK. It has higher clocks than geforce 6 but dosn't always perform faster.

The X1k high end series gets higher performance than the Nvidia counterpart, even with less pixel pipelines, along with ultra threaded shaders.

Anyway, Crossfire X1950XTX get 67fps with FEAR maxed out 4x AA and 16x AF. What more can someone want?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 26th, 2006 at 11:36pm

Ashton Lawson   Offline
Colonel
FS Water Configurator
Programmer
Phuket, Thailand

Gender: male
Posts: 1211
*****
 
Hmm, 100 fps with graphics maxed out with 16x antialiasing?

And nVidia only supports 4 at the moment (key phrase: at the moment)
 

...&&FS Water Configurator+ has new modifications in the works, plus DirectX 10, Service Pack&&1, and Radeon HD 3+ Series support.
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Sep 27th, 2006 at 8:11am
Bindoe   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Hmm, 100 fps with graphics maxed out with 16x antialiasing?

And nVidia only supports 4 at the moment (key phrase: at the moment)

4x AA with 16x AF. AA = Anti Aliasing. AF = Anisotopic filtering.

The 8 core thing is about two Quaddro plex's in SLI Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Sep 27th, 2006 at 9:31am

Sterk   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 316
*****
 
Quote:
but the specs at the bottom make me cry.


Hmm...256 bit bus and 512 mb of videomemory?
Pretty humble even for modern high end cards...
Cards with similar specs you could buy already several months ago...Other specs matters also though...Dunno...
 

...&&&&
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print