Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Meeting Tristar/DC10 task
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Meeting Tristar/DC10 task (Read 189 times)
Aug 24
th
, 2006 at 5:39am
chornedsnorkack
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 363
Tristar and DC-10 were built to meet the same design task:
On a hot summer day, they had to take off from La Guardia notoriously short runway with full payload and fuel for trip, with safety margin for one engine out
and on a hot summer day, they had to take off from Denver, with full fuel and payload, and in case of one engine out, still cross the Rockies.
Both Lockheed and Douglas started to design twinjets towards those targets in 1966 or so, then gave up trying and chose trijets.
A300 program started 1966-1967, simultaneously with Tristar and DC-10 - and they stuck to twin.
Later on, Boeing joined the twin widebody production with 767.
Can A300 meet the La Guardia and Denver requirements? Can B767? What about A330? Or B777?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Aug 24
th
, 2006 at 5:41am
Mictheslik
Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England
Gender:
Posts: 6011
Dont know quite what this has to do with 3D design??
.mic
[center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Aug 24
th
, 2006 at 5:54am
chornedsnorkack
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 363
Quote:
Dont know quite what this has to do with 3D design??
.mic
Does not and does not need to.
The topic of the forum is "Aircraft & 3D Design" So, it is Aircraft Design and 3d Design.
This obviously has to do with Aircraft Design. How did Lockheed and Douglas go about meeting restrictive airpord performance requirements? And how did/do Airbus and Boeing?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Aug 24
th
, 2006 at 1:16pm
SkyNoz
Offline
Colonel
Project Kfir!
Gender:
Posts: 1720
Quote:
Does not and does not need to.
The topic of the forum is "Aircraft & 3D Design" So, it is Aircraft Design and 3d Design.
This obviously has to do with Aircraft Design. How did Lockheed and Douglas go about meeting restrictive airpord performance requirements? And how did/do Airbus and Boeing?
Well, the option of having that extra third engine in the tail, helps significantly. If you could calculate the thrust provided by the eninges in relation to aircraft weight, it's easily has enough power to fly a consederble distance.
Other then the wide body availabillity of landing at La Guardia, that's something you can actually test in Flightsim. If you really can try and download the performance sheets of those aircraft and look at max takeoff runway distance ect. that would easily answer you question wheather the aircraft mentioned can make it out of that airport.
Project Kfir!&&
&&
My Gmax page
&&Aircraft modeler/Aircarft painter&&&&Aye the key!&&[GeneralEngineData]&&//0=Piston, 1=Jet, 2=None, 3=Helo-Turbine, 4=Rocket, 5=Turboprop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Aug 24
th
, 2006 at 7:15pm
Lazerbeak
Offline
Colonel
[ch1055][ch1091][ch1
089][ch1090][ch1100]
[ch1073][ch1077][ch1
075][ch1091][ch1090]
[ch1085][ch1077][ch1
091][ch1082][ch1083]
[ch1102][ch1078][ch1
077] [ch1087][ch1077][ch1
096][ch1077][ch1093]
[ch1086][ch1076][ch1
099] [ch1087][ch1086]
[ch1083][ch1091][ch1
078][ch1072][ch1084]
...
A house.
Gender:
Posts: 712
For the record, this forum is dedicated to
virtual
aircraft design. As in, aircraft design in terms of 3D modelling, etc.
If you have a question about actual
real-world
aircraft design, then the "Real Aviation" forum located southwards is what you're looking for.
&&&&
The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Aug 24
th
, 2006 at 9:54pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Moved.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.