Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
rate + advice for improvements (Read 498 times)
Aug 16th, 2006 at 9:04am

debug   Offline
Colonel
York,England

Gender: male
Posts: 127
*****
 
titled patchwork due to using VFR photo terrain of the uk.
...

all the best
Debug
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 9:07am

Mictheslik   Offline
Colonel
Me in G-LFSM :D
Bristol, England

Gender: male
Posts: 6011
*****
 
I give it a sturdy 7, you could have waited for the textures to load a little bit more at the top, although the clouds are nice.

Too bad about compression.....it really killed this pic.

.Mic
 

[center]...
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 9:12am
Heathaze   Ex Member

 
5/10. There isn't really much happening in this one but the scenery is (mostly) decent.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 12:22pm

Clipper   Offline
Global Moderator
Clearly Canadian

Posts: 8861
*****
 
6/10 Nice pic if you look at each element seperately. Nice aircraft, decent scenery, neat cumulus....but what you may have wanted to do is bring everything to-gether so each seperate element becomes an important part of the whole scene. There could be more harmony to all the different elements, they should use each other to create a story, a theme, or maybe just a "raison d'etre"..(reason for being) As well, i've always felt that aircraft shown in a pic should be quite close to the viewer and usually the primary focus of the screenshot. When all the principal elements of a pic are far away from those looking at it, the pic tends to lose impact, meaning or drama. Not to say you need to zoom right up to the aircraft on every pic, but if your scenery and secondary focal points (clouds, bridges, AI) are typical and relatively lifeless, a wicked aircraft close up using a new and interesting angle or perspective will go a long way in transforming a typical pic into a great one... Smiley
« Last Edit: Aug 16th, 2006 at 8:19pm by Clipper »  

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 12:55pm

Ecko   Offline
Colonel
-
Denmark

Gender: male
Posts: 4012
*****
 
4.5/10


- Boring aircraft (texture wise), there's nothing really catchy about it.

- Boring ground textures.

- Very dull colours.

- No real movement in the shot.

The only really nice thing about this shot, in my opinon, is the very detailed airbase.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 12:57pm

Clipper   Offline
Global Moderator
Clearly Canadian

Posts: 8861
*****
 
Ecko, why don't you include a few suggestions as to how he could improve his shot...(part two of his thread title)  Wink
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 1:06pm

Ecko   Offline
Colonel
-
Denmark

Gender: male
Posts: 4012
*****
 
Sure. Smiley


- Pump up the colours! You could for example have used this paint, or one similar:

...

[It's the same aircraft, actually the very same model]


- You could've gotten some sky in there, with some clouds, that's always good, that would've given the shot some contrast too.

- Also, give the aircraft some movement, example; the shot above.

- I really don't like those ground textures, if you like em', keep em', but in my opinion they don't look good, in screenshots at least.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Aug 16th, 2006 at 3:03pm

Harold   Offline
Colonel
Knowledge Is Power
EHTE

Gender: male
Posts: 5998
*****
 
That's what I call advice! Great example Ecko!
Hope this is valuable advice and that it helps you, debug!
 

...

Dell Dimension 8300 | P4 3.2 Ghz. | 2 GB RAM | 150 GB WD Raptor | Gainward 7800 GS+ 512 | FS-GS

click here to read my Studio V interview
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print