Simviation Forum - L-100 (C-130) Unpopularity

Jul 9^th, 2006 at 4:20pm

Drake_TigerClaw Offline
Colonel
The Plundering Wonder!
Atlanta, Ga, USA

Gender:
Posts: 110

Does anyone know why C-130s are unpopular in the civilian market? It seems like it would make a great cargo ferry but there arent that many in civilian aviation. Are they too expensive to operate or just not suited to civi cargo? I mean you woud think that cargo services woulkd jump on it.

~Drake TigerClaw&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Jul 9^th, 2006 at 4:32pm

flyboy 28 Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323

There's no real need for them. Airlines are better off with more efficient designs, created solely for civilians. Examples for "competitors" to the L-100 would be the ATR family, ERJs etc.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Jul 10^th, 2006 at 11:34am

Ivan Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 6058

1: there arent many of these in civil hands to start with
2: lockheed civil sales werent great anytime

And the main reason: An-12s are cheaper (and havent been shot at usually, even if second-hand)

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones), Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Jul 10^th, 2006 at 12:52pm

Drake_TigerClaw Offline
Colonel
The Plundering Wonder!
Atlanta, Ga, USA

Gender:
Posts: 110

I think maybe its more along the lines of the fact that its the wrong size. Its a medium sized cargo plane which makes it too big and expensive for a small operation which would go for something like a DC-3 or a Cessna Caravan and too small for a big operation which would use a cargo version of a commercial liner like a DC-10.

~Drake TigerClaw&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Jul 16^th, 2006 at 2:22pm

cheesegrater Ex Member

The C-130 is more suitable for operation from small unequipped airfields. In modern airports newer aircraft are more efficient. In the 3rd world where the aircraft is suitable, Russian aircraft are cheaper. So there is a small market for the aircraft.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Jul 21^st, 2006 at 8:08pm

Felix/FFDS Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender:
Posts: 1000000627

Also, the airplane's own history is against it.... I mean, any "civilian" Hercules would immediately be seen as being part of Air America (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) ... just as Aeroflot was (still is?) a totally civilian enterprise. (Note, I'm not complaining that Aeroflot was, in the grand scheme of things, part and parcel of the Soviet defence scheme, for me, it's a matter of fact)

However, for the civilian market, a well maintained An-12 (or similar) is probably more economical to operate (especially if it's not US registered)

Felix/FFDS

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Jul 22^nd, 2006 at 2:22am

Drake_TigerClaw Offline
Colonel
The Plundering Wonder!
Atlanta, Ga, USA

Gender:
Posts: 110

Speaking of Air America there was a pilot named Rik Luytjes back in the 80's who owned a very successful aircraft modification company called Air America. But he smuggled a ton of coke in a modified Cessna 310, not a C-130.

~Drake TigerClaw&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Jul 22^nd, 2006 at 10:36pm

flyboy 28 Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323

They made a movie about that, didn't they?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #8 - Jul 22^nd, 2006 at 11:08pm

Felix/FFDS Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender:
Posts: 1000000627

Quote:

They made a movie about that, didn't they?

NO, the movie was about the CIA run Air America out of Thailand and Vietnam in the '60s. Quite an interesting part of aviation history since most of the pilots were mostly ex-military, " soldiers of fortune", and the strict civilian regulation were niceties more often observed in their breach.

Felix/FFDS

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #9 - Jul 22^nd, 2006 at 11:13pm

flyboy 28 Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323

Ah, but it was titled Air America, no? Just to make sure I'm not losing my wits.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #10 - Jul 23^rd, 2006 at 2:12pm

beaky Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender:
Posts: 14187

Quote:

Ah, but it was titled Air America, no? Just to make sure I'm not losing my wits.

Yes, but the movie was about the Air America that flew missions for "the company" (shhhh) in SE Asia; not the Air America that smuggled drugs.
Wait... now I'm confused... Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: