Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
New Planes (Read 5091 times)
Reply #30 - May 11th, 2006 at 1:33pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
The FS2002 Vought Corsair was straight out of CFS2 & I suspect was added as a convenient extra. The Sopwith Camel was in FS98, FS2000 & FS2002 but neither were included with FS9.

As for Concorde, the terrible Paris accident happened some time before FS2002 was released. I suspect that Microsoft no longer wanted to be associated with it. Also, if I remember correctly, the release of FS2002 was delayed by the events of 9/11.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #31 - May 11th, 2006 at 4:37pm

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Quote:
The FS2002 Vought Corsair was straight out of CFS2 & I suspect was added as a convenient extra. The Sopwith Camel was in FS98, FS2000 & FS2002 but neither were included with FS9.

As for Concorde, the terrible Paris accident happened some time before FS2002 was released. I suspect that Microsoft no longer wanted to be associated with it. Also, if I remember correctly, the release of FS2002 was delayed by the events of 9/11.


I read an article on CNN's website that one reporter was testing FS2000 to see how it looked after hearing that the terrorists used it for their training. The guy was awed by its realism and accuracy. After that, M$ decided to rearrange the scenery in FS2002.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #32 - May 12th, 2006 at 6:55am

vololiberista   Offline
Colonel
Vieni in Italia

Posts: 1042
*****
 
Quote:
I read an article on CNN's website that one reporter was testing FS2000 to see how it looked after hearing that the terrorists used it for their training. The guy was awed by its realism and accuracy. After that, M$ decided to rearrange the scenery in FS2002.


One suposes that in order to prevent terroists you would have to reprint all the maps as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vololiberista
 

Andiamo in Italia&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #33 - May 17th, 2006 at 12:12pm

Travis   Offline
Colonel
Cannot find REALITY.SYS.
Universe halted.
Dripping Springs, TX

Gender: male
Posts: 4515
*****
 
That terrorist stuff is pure garbage . . .

Saying that someone could learn to fly, operate and crash an aircraft into a building (not really that hard, anyway) just from using FS is like saying someone could learn to do drive-by shootings by playing Grand Theft Auto.  There's just no comparison to the real act of doing something so disgusting and vile.

As to this thread's ORIGINAL idea, I've been looking around at what's new aircraft-wise for FSX.  I noticed that they have several new aircraft already shown: Maule, Beaver and Grumman Goose.  I was looking at images of the Goose (trying to get a front-end view) and noticed that in the following two shots, there are two versions of the aircraft: one with outboard floats and one without.

AVSim Shot

FlightSim Shot

Does this point to an increase in multi-model stuff?  In FS9, the only aircraft that have more than one model are the Cessna 208 and the Lockheed Vega.  I'm fairly sure they won't include the Lockheed Vega in the new release, so that leaves the Cessna.  Could it be they are branching out, making more models for the stock aircraft?

I realize that FS is more of a modder's paradise than anything else, but I do think it would be a good idea if the quality of what we buy could be somewhere close to the quality of what's available out there.

For instance, how many of us would simply discard (or render unusable) the stock Goose if it were less visually enticing than one of the others available online?  I know for a fact that if it doesn't match up, I'm simply going to delete it and replace it with the Lynn and Bill Lyons version.  No thought needed.

So where does that leave the stock aircraft?  After all, there are replacements for nearly every single aircraft in FS9, and I KNOW that there are replacements, all freeware, for all the currently known new stock aircraft of FSX.

So are all of the designers over there just getting shafted because they aren't using their talents to the full, or is this the limit of their abilities?  If it is, by all means, go hire Lynn and Bill!  They have the talent and the want to do this stuff, and they're doing it for FREE right now!  They're stomping MS into the dust with their versions of aircraft, and most of it they aren't even getting paid for.

Anyway, that was my rant for the day.  I'm gonna go replace the car oil now. Wink
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #34 - Jun 15th, 2006 at 2:38pm

machineman9   Offline
Colonel
Nantwich, England

Gender: male
Posts: 5255
*****
 
Quote:
That terrorist stuff is pure garbage . . .

Saying that someone could learn to fly, operate and crash an aircraft into a building (not really that hard, anyway) just from using FS is like saying someone could learn to do drive-by shootings by playing Grand Theft Auto.  There's just no comparison to the real act of doing something so disgusting and vile.


yeh, it was a tragic event. but i saw this program where this super nerd flew a real plane from the knowledge of a sim
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #35 - Jun 17th, 2006 at 2:02am

n_richardson05   Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets

Gender: male
Posts: 285
*****
 
i the sim would give somone a step up when going into the real world because its not compleatly un familiar


 

big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print