Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
new default aircraft on fsx (Read 5266 times)
Reply #15 - Mar 19th, 2006 at 1:16am

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Quote:
That's what happens with real aircraft. A lot of aircraft have been lost, particularly test aircraft, when they have been pushed beyond their limit, some literally shaking themselves apart.


Like that video some of us have seen recently with the tested Chinook.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Mar 21st, 2006 at 10:24pm

ctjoyce   Offline
Colonel
Funny how my lappy runs
FSX better than your
Tower
USA

Gender: male
Posts: 4022
*****
 
Oh do tell? I hate that chopper, so would like to see the video.

Cheers
Cameron
 

CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003&&Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII&&Vesper's Specs: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 2GB DDR2-667, GeForce Go 7950GTX 512MB, 160GB Hitachi SATA 5400RPM&&Hardware FAQ, Read it and be informed&&My little corner of the world&&Once You Know You NEWEGG&&Building a computer Part 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Mar 30th, 2006 at 9:02am

n_richardson05   Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets

Gender: male
Posts: 285
*****
 
well i wouldent expect the air craft to move like that i do know they can be destroyed by shaking apart but do real aircaft act in that way when pushed to the limit it dosent seem phisicaly possible for an aircraft to shak like that i dont know. but i have no experence with the  real thing other than airshows and airports

and if pushed to the limit i would like to see parts to fly off if i turn on the aircraft damage you know in cfs3 i would test the aircraft to destruction, here it might be fun to. but whiney aircraft manufactures might not like the aspect of simulated aircraft destruction
 

big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Mar 30th, 2006 at 9:23am

expat   Offline
Colonel
Deep behind enemy lines!

Gender: male
Posts: 8499
*****
 
Quote:
well i wouldent expect the air craft to move like that i do know they can be destroyed by shaking apart but do real aircaft act in that way when pushed to the limit it dosent seem phisicaly possible for an aircraft to shak like that i dont know. but i have no experence with the  real thing other than airshows and airports

and if pushed to the limit i would like to see parts to fly off if i turn on the aircraft damage you know in cfs3 i would test the aircraft to destruction, here it might be fun to. but whiney aircraft manufactures might not like the aspect of simulated aircraft destruction



Not just "whiney aircraft manufactures", we have had a very long discussion about damage effects already. There are some points of view in that thread that are at extreme ends of both sides of the conversation. Take a look at the thread "Damage Effects" before we open up that can of worms again.

Matt
 

PETA ... People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 Boeing 737-800 and Dash8 Q-400
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Apr 4th, 2006 at 12:01pm

n_richardson05   Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets

Gender: male
Posts: 285
*****
 
i understand 911 and all that stuf, now that i think of it if we get into that it might raise some issues. but still i would like a little more to happen other than a red message.
 

big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Apr 4th, 2006 at 7:10pm

Radopilot   Offline
Colonel
'Simming since '99!
The US of A.

Gender: male
Posts: 421
*****
 
I'd have to second Richardson. Yes, I want for there to be more than just a fuselage sticking out of the ground, but I don't want FS to become so real that it becomes another tool for more hijackers. Which happened in 9/11, the terrorists used FS to train. Evil scum, who tarnished the FS name Angry
 

Proud iPod Touch Owner, 1.5 Hours Real World Piloting Time
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Apr 6th, 2006 at 8:06am

n_richardson05   Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets

Gender: male
Posts: 285
*****
 
terrorests dont need the 757 to blow into a million pices to know weather or not they hit the building i think they took out the visual damages to make sensitive people happy.
 

big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Apr 7th, 2006 at 11:13am

TheBod1357   Offline
Colonel
Chip an' a chair
Omaha, NE

Gender: male
Posts: 162
*****
 
well, since this is becoming a damage thread, I think I will revert back to the original topic with an idea for aircraft.

I realize there are some out there already, but what if MS included a Concorde sometime in the coming simulators? It wouldnt hurt to have a realistic supersonic airliner along with the other airplane types.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Apr 7th, 2006 at 1:26pm

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Quote:
well, since this is becoming a damage thread, I think I will revert back to the original topic with an idea for aircraft.

I realize there are some out there already, but what if MS included a Concorde sometime in the coming simulators? It wouldnt hurt to have a realistic supersonic airliner along with the other airplane types.


Very true. With the new altittude that we have seen in the video, it's better to have the concorde back.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Apr 7th, 2006 at 6:49pm

Wingo   Offline
Colonel
Your marmalade is no match
for my VEGEMITE!!
YSBK. Back where I belong.

Gender: male
Posts: 1322
*****
 
Would it be possible to say the aircraft in the screenshots released by MS are included as the new default? Off the top of my head there is a Maule M-7, which IMO would be a nice inclusion.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Apr 11th, 2006 at 6:47pm
lilley   Ex Member

 
i think that there would be loads of uproar if A380 and or 7e7/787 werent there. But given the "surprises" promised i wouldnt be surprised to possibly see the A350 there!
that is if the designs for it are released it time for them to be able to put the real flight dynamis in ???
would be nice to see i think.
lilley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Apr 11th, 2006 at 7:53pm

Airshow_lover   Offline
Colonel
I'm back........!
LaVergne, TN

Gender: male
Posts: 1740
*****
 
 

C/SMSgt - Civil Air Patrol
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Apr 14th, 2006 at 8:34am

n_richardson05   Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets

Gender: male
Posts: 285
*****
 
whats an a350 is it a 4 engin aicraft simular to the 777
 

big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Apr 20th, 2006 at 4:32am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Quote:
whats an a350 is it a 4 engin aicraft simular to the 777

Just a new version of the A330 that airbus are designing.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Apr 25th, 2006 at 11:15am

n_richardson05   Offline
Colonel
some where pretending
im flying
massachussets

Gender: male
Posts: 285
*****
 
lets hope in fsx the skins wont be screwd up out of the box like in fs9 that was eratating, lazy, and frankly stupid. Angry
 

big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right&&slew mode dose not count as flying&&737-700aholic
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print