Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
re occupation of the Rhineland... (Read 491 times)
Mar 7th, 2006 at 10:07am

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
From the History Channel:

Quote:
1936 Hitler reoccupies the Rhineland


Nazi leader Adolf Hitler violates the Treaty of Versailles and the Locarno Pact by sending German military forces into the Rhineland, a demilitarized zone along the Rhine River in western Germany.


What if the French and Allies had opposed this occupation in 1936 vs doing nothing?
 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 7th, 2006 at 11:19am

Ijineda   Offline
Colonel
Vienna, Austria

Gender: male
Posts: 1007
*****
 
Germany would have been defeated in less than one month, the german people would have revolted against Hitler and WW2 would never have happened.

But helas - that was just an early masterpiece of appeasement.
 

Intel Quad Core 2 Extreme Q6600 @ 2.60GHz - Radeon HD 4850 - P5N-D - 4 GB RAM
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 7th, 2006 at 1:14pm

Saitek   Offline
Colonel
UK

Gender: male
Posts: 7555
*****
 
Agreed with the above.
That is one reason why I blame the governments of Europe for helping to cause the way - for being so slack. The League of Nations might have been an organisation for peace, but that sometimes means that it must be one for war. Unfortunately they didn't realise that then. Roll Eyes Sad
 

Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FSX with Saitek's pro flight range:
Radio
Switch panel
Auto-pilot
Yoke and throttle quad
Pedals
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 7th, 2006 at 11:41pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
It is remarkable how easily things got out of hand... it's almost as if a spell had been cast.
But I think some of the apparent lassitude on the part of other govenments was based on an ill-placed hope that Germany would revolt... they didn't fully understand what was going on there.
As for the rest of it, many of the nations involved remembered WWI all too well, and were very reluctant to throw the gauntlet down again.
But I agree- every time I read an account of Hitler's remarkable early progress, I think I'd have made the call to get in there right away. Probably would have been bloody, but brief. With Hitler out of the game, Italy would have folded, Russia would have probably not grabbed as much territory as it did, and had Japan still made its play, it would have been far less difficult to defeat them.

 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 8th, 2006 at 5:11am

candle_86   Offline
Colonel
it's better to die free,
than be a slave
Fort Worth

Gender: male
Posts: 397
*****
 
I don't know, for some reason the game Red Alert comes to mind. It is likly that Russia instead would have made the move if Germany hadn't. Both were facist governments, we may have fought the easier one to beat actully. If Germany had been stopped early there would be noting to stop Stalin from declearing war him self, the only reason we ever allied was to stop hitler and only reason Russia joined was because Hitler attacked, so we prolly woulda had a war anyway, and I'd have to say its small blessing it was with Germany than Russia
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Mar 8th, 2006 at 11:44am

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
Candle_86 - you make valid points.  I believe, however, that the Stalin government would not have openly declared war, but rather would have fomented and aided in-country Bolshevists as they had been doing in Germany (pre-1933) and in Spain.

The fascists in Germany *could* have been stopped, and confidence in the shaken, but given the conditions, another possibility could be that the Allies, given that they had to stop German expansionism "again"  could have imposed even stronger sanctions, giving rise to either a resurgent nationalism under someone other than the nazis, and/or a Bolshevist type revolution against the fascists that "once again"  led to German " humiliation"

Japan was already on an expansionist program, and I believe that their push would have eventually collided with the Western presence (Indo-China, Phillipines, China).  With no major war in Europe pushing an arms race, it's conceivable that the Western Powers (GB/.France/USA) could have been even less prepared than they were in 1941.  (Considering that war production had been ramping up, and that the weapons the ultimately won the war were already in development by late 1941).

IF a settlement had not been reached with the Japanese, I think that eventually the US led industrial might would have gained a much more costly victory.  However, there could also have been the possibility of a settlement with Japan, giving Japan control over what they already had in China and some of the Southeast Asian colonies/nations.
 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Mar 8th, 2006 at 12:57pm

candle_86   Offline
Colonel
it's better to die free,
than be a slave
Fort Worth

Gender: male
Posts: 397
*****
 
You do make some valid points also, but with Japan I do not feel they would have been so bold as to attack the US without German Aid. Why it's true the number of war machines rolling in 1941 were because of Germany, the Pacfic fleet was still armed at the time with capable fighters. The Japanesse knew they couldn't beat us, they were hopeing that the War in Europe would cause our gaurd to be lowered if even for a second. As everyone knows we were not prepared in the Pacfic in 1941. But it is likly that given circumstances in Japan without a European conflict waging, we might have paid more attetion to Japan, and may have been better prepared.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print