Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Aircraft registrations... (Read 377 times)
Mar 6th, 2006 at 4:00am

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
Last weekend I shot a Beechcraft Sierra passing my home ( Belgium)

...

I noticed the strange registration. All Belgian planes have a code starting with OO

Now, watching Rottydaddy's shots I see the planes have a N-registration

http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=photos;action=display;num=...

Does this mean the Bonanza is registered in the states? If so, how did it end up in Europe?

Cheers,

Omag

                             

 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 4:43am
Mynameisnemo   Ex Member

 
It does mean it was registered in the States Kris, but as with certain aircraft, they have to be certified by the CAA/FAA/Other countries Aviation Authoritys before they can be allowed to fly there, its quite a regular thing to see a "N" registered aircraft in a country other than the states.

This has been copy'd from the C.A.A Website:
Quote:
The following standards are based on the time taken from the receipt of all relevant documentation, to the despatch of the appropriate Certificate, or other item, by first class post. :-

ISSUE OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OR CANCELLATION
New Aircraft, Restorations and Changes of Marks -up to 3 working days
Change of Registered Ownership and Other Register Amendments - up to 7 working days
Aircraft de-registered to other countries - up to 3 working days
Exemptions from Article 5 of the Air Navigation Order - up to 3 working days


Also this Link might be of some use to you.

I'll also see if i can get some info from where i used to work about this.

nemo....
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 5:34am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
I don't know the reason but FAA registered aircraft are becoming quite common in the UK now. In some cases it might be more convenient.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 5:54am

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
it seems such a task to transport it from the States to Europe! Or doesn't the plane need to be physically in the country when it's registered? Seems highly unlikely to me!
 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 6:08am

Ivan   Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 6058
*****
 
Money Money Money and... Money

And some licensing issues and esthetical stuff

- Why most bizjets have P4 reg... because it's cheaper. Same for N reg, especially when the aircraft does many US - europe hops.
- Why most warbirds have Nxxx reg... because most other countries require BIG reg fonts, which look ugly
- Why An-2 and non-warbird status Yak have RA or some other east european reg... that is because in the US you have a restriction for operating it, and in the UK because getting it on UK register takes loads of paperwork and time. Most of the RA aircraft came from either the RF or the DOSAAF list which is for internal use only.

And the last one: why EX and the 9L ones... because nobody else will arrange the insurance for these. Iraiq Airways has some with 9L reg because they don't have an aviation authority yet and because the neighbours want to see money (Kuwait)
(FYI: EX is Kyrghyzstan and 9L is Sierra Leone)
 

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 6:14am

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Quote:
it seems such a task to transport it from the States to Europe! Or doesn't the plane need to be physically in the country when it's registered? Seems highly unlikely to me!


Most airplanes are not exactly transported across the Atlantic- they're ferried. Stick an aux tank in the back seat, find an experienced ferry pilot, and you're good to go.

http://www.ferryflights.org/

  It's usually cheaper, believe it or not (consider what would have to be done to that Bonanza to crate it for shipping! Tongue)
But wait a sec: that's not a Bonanza... it's a Sierra... note the straight wing...
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 7:06am

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
I know Rotty, I mistyped... Thanks for enlarging my mistake...  Grin  Grin  Grin

And here I was, thinking there was a rule about the amount of engines required by law to cross the Atlantic...

Thanks for the link Rotty!
 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 11:44am

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
It shoud be mentioned that it actually technically is possible to fly across the Atlantic in small, single engines-my CFI knew a guy who delivered a 172 from Anchorage (I believe it was Anchorage, it was somewhere in Alaska) to Honolulu Shocked (lots and LOTS of auxillery tanks and a diet on the part of the pilot Grin)

Naturally, going over the Atlantic would involve routing through Northern Canada and Greenland, I'm sure.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 1:17pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
I believe ferry flights are still common. I know several owners who picked their new aircraft up at the factory & hired a navigator to help ferry them to Europe. This was back in the 1960s. One chap stopped for a few days at Shoreham before carrying on to Singapore which was his final destination. This was in a brand new Piper Comanche fitted with tip tanks. I had the keys in my pocket the whole weekend in case it needed repicketing. He gave me a ride in it before departing for Singers.

More & more maintenance organisations in the UK & Europe are becoming certified FAA Repair Stations so aircraft can retain their FAA certification with no need for them to return to the US for major servicing. This seems to go against the whole idea of the JAA & FAA being basically the same. Knowing the feelings between them I could never see that working out. As usual it simply makes things more complicated. Roll Eyes
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 2:53pm

Omag 2.0   Offline
Colonel
No badger comes close!
Somewhere, Belgium

Gender: male
Posts: 11985
*****
 
Now why don't they just come up with a world-wide standard is beyond me. I mean, come on, flying is a global thing these days. That'll put an end to the registrations in more "liberal" regions ( ex. Ghana etc...)
 

&&...&&&&Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be&&&&Or go straight to Omag's Album
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 4:10pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
Now why don't they just come up with a world-wide standard is beyond me. I mean, come on, flying is a global thing these days. That'll put an end to the registrations in more "liberal" regions ( ex. Ghana etc...)

Well, the CAA (ARB as it once was) & FAA have been trying to come up with common standards for as long as I've been in the industry. I thought we might get somewhere when the JAA was formed but they haven't agreed yet so I don't think there's much chance now. In fact they seem to grow further apart. My poor brother is now having to go through it all again since the JAR (Joint Aviation Requirements) approvals have been changed to the new EASA (European Aviation Safety Agency) requirements. http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?categoryid=720&pagetype=90&pageid=3945

And so it goes on. This never-ending bureaucracy is the main reason I & many of my contemporaries took early retirement. Roll Eyes

PS. EASA website. http://www.easa.eu.int/home/index.html
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Mar 6th, 2006 at 6:27pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
I seem to remember in the 90s several British operated warbirds were commonly operated under N registratoins...

All a bureaucratic exercise... Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Mar 8th, 2006 at 2:46am

Ivan   Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 6058
*****
 
Quote:
Now why don't they just come up with a world-wide standard is beyond me. I mean, come on, flying is a global thing these days. That'll put an end to the registrations in more "liberal" regions ( ex. Ghana etc...)

Only ones left in that part of the world are 3C (equatorial guinea) and 9L (Sierra leone). the rest is either cleaned up or banned (like Liberia which is 100% owned by Viktor Bout, a well known arms smuggler)
 

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Mar 8th, 2006 at 4:18pm

Sytse   Offline
Colonel
Virtual Red Arrows
The Netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 3590
*****
 
Thought they all started with "MS"... ???






Tongue  Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print