Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Camera's (Read 156 times)
Feb 25th, 2006 at 11:19am

Sir_Jon   Offline
Colonel
Cambs, England

Gender: male
Posts: 1619
*****
 
Ok heres the deal, I've been looking at both Active camera and Walk and Follow, read all the reviews etc. Thought I would get a good honest answer here sooo...
Which is best?
Currently leaning towards W & F  Grin
Any opinions very much appreciated.
Thanks
Sirjon90
 

...&&AMD Athlon™ 64 FX-60 Dual Core&&with HyperTransport™ Technology&&Genuine Windows® XP Media Center &&ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe Mainboard&&2048MB DDR 400 Memory&&600GB Serial ATA Hard Drive &&2x 512MB GeForce 7900GTX SLI&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Feb 25th, 2006 at 12:29pm

Tom.   Offline
Colonel
Image removed, do not
link!

Gender: male
Posts: 874
*****
 
Walk and follow the only thing it doesnt have which Ac has is head movement
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Feb 25th, 2006 at 5:53pm

Joe_D   Offline
Colonel
"Takeoffs are optional,
landings are mandatory!"
NY state

Gender: male
Posts: 839
*****
 
While W&F is good, AC is much better IMO.

As mentioned, it has programable "head latency" (movement) that gives a much more realistice feel/view in the VC.

It also has programable Latency (movement) in the spot view that is also more realistic.

The ability to easily program a runway position (with a single mouse click) to  view a landing aproach on replay is great! On replay, simply Shift+right mouse click to pick your runway position to view the aproach and landing. Then swith to approach view and view the landing.
These three things alone is worth the small  price!

Finally, Serge's support for AC is outstanding.
Just last week I needed a new Key after a reformat and Serge e-mailed me the new key in a few hours!

To me, FS-9 is just not complete without AC. Smiley

 

Home airports are KMGJ and KSWF in Orange County, NY&&Stop by and say hello. Smiley
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print