Yup! ....based on fighting in the Pacific.  I can't wait!

Enjoy!

http://www.the-pacific-war.com/

I could never get into the series myself.

Quote:

Actually I will generally not watch Hollywood movies of true stories for the simple fact they turn it into something it isn't.

Quote:


Classical british war movies or documentations.
Both treat the enemy with respect and don't kick him with feet, like in Hollywood productions.

Battle of Britain!

The best examples for treating both sides equally.

Battle of Britain sure is a great movie!

Band of Brothers has to rank as one of the best produced TV series ever made. Reading the book by the late Stephen Ambrose, it appeared very true to fact, and was excellently produced, a change from many "Hollywood" productions. Then again, it was made on an airfield 25 miles north of London (home of the DH Mosquito, another of Björn's favourites!)

I don't understand the shclepping of BOB in with the rest of the Hollywood movies.  Have you guys actually watched it? (addressing Craig and Bjorn here)  It is, quite simply, one of the greatest war series' ever made.  I find it hard to believe you've viewed it if you're grouping it with Mel Gibson and Bruce Willis movies, because honestly that's kind of ignorant.  The series went out of it's way to SEPARATE itself from the hollywood production norm.

I look forward to the new series

Quote:

Where did I once say I grouped it with hollywood movies? re-read carefully what I wrote. I said I didn't like it. It was dcunning who brought up the hollywood factor as a completly seperate thing and I said I tried to avoid those sorts of things.

...and half the cast was British...

Craig mentioned "633 Squadron" - a good film in that its (fictitious) story was quite accurate to how an operation could have worked (it actually took several ideas from several real raids). However, the special effects dpartment were no more than vandals IMO, destroying no less than three DH Mosquitos during filming...

The scene I remember most is probably the Bastogne bombing scene as I was only a mile or so away when they filmed it. It really did sound like an air raid going on at 10 at night!

Quote:


Only one episode. And I've had to throw up as they showed another stupid full-front-storm-everything-without-thinking-attack by the germans which was repelled by five hero-like american soldiers.

Hollywood is completely dead for me since then. Started right with "Saving Pvt. Ryan".

Quote:

Yup and like I said, I just couldn't get into it.

Quote:

This was a common occurence during the trench warfare of WWI. It was more often the British soldiers who suffered the most, mown down by a few well-placed German machine guns. Literally thousands of them died on these assaults, often in a matter of minutes. Knowing how history repeats itself it wouldn't surprise me if the same mistakes were repeated in WWII.

Quote:

You can include the British in that. The RAF never learned anything from years of air combat in WWI & had to start all over again.

Quote:


Well, to be fair the Royal Navy and Army did try and shut down the RAF in the years following WWI, and the RAF was mostly confined to "Policing the Empire" and a little bit of Home Defence/Aerobatics/Flying Club...

OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG

Quote:


But the way it's depicted in Band of Brothers is just ridiculous.

Quote:



I agree.  I recall the one episode where the general wanted them to snatch prisoners to stroke his own ego.  Then upon a successful mission, he called for another mission for more ego stroking.  His callousness for needlessly endangering the lives of his men was totally believable.  And Winters told them to get a good night's sleep and he'll file a report that they went across but found no Germans to snatch.

I believe every army has it's Dick Winters, and also has it's share of these morons.

I can think of a few scenarios where leaders chose ego over prudence and the concern for their own troops:

Montgomery - Operation Market Garden
Halsey - Battle of Leyte Gulf
Stalin - race to Berlin


....he he he, let the debating begin!   

RE: Montgomery, that's where I expected to get a response.  It's debatable, I'm sure he had good intentions, but one wonders how much to play his enormous ego affected his judgement, expecially considering his well-known rivalry with the other enormous ego:  *cough* ol' blood-n-gut's himself, Patton! 

Quote:



I don't understand that.  What would Patton have to do with the men under Montgomery's command?

Quote:


I just went on a google tour, and I could'nt find anything to cooberate Montgomery and Patton not getting along having to do with a concern for the troops.  On the other hand, I did see text stating Montgomery criticized Eisenhower and accusing his commander of lending his ear to his rival Patton.  That text jives with what I recall having learned in the past.  In fact, Eisenhower almost fired Montgomery for insubordination.

Quote:


I agree, and personally, I'm not impressed by either.  To me, the watershed moment for my dislike for Patton was when he slapped a troop and berated him for "merely" having stress due to combat.

Regarding Halsey, I grudingly admire him.  My reservation re: him has to do with him chasing Ozawa's carriers and abandoning his post off Samar.

And I have absolutely no admiration for Stalin.

Quote:

I think there was a lot of political influence from different quarters behind the appointment of both. I always had a great deal of respect for General Eisenhower who must have had a hard time keeping them in check. You mentioned that he threatened Monty with the sack & I believe he also did the same with Patton. I read that Monty didn't think much of Ike's capabilities as a general due to lack of experience in the field but he repected him for his organisational skills which were more important in his position as Supreme Allied Commander. They apparently got on very well considering Monty's prickly nature.

As for Monty's reputation of caring for his men, he might well have done & he undoubtedly inspired the 'Desert Rats' in North Africa who are still loyal to him today. This didn't stop him being completely ruthless with their lives at times & if I recall correctly my father-in-law & his colleagues didn't have the same affection or trust for him. Unfortunately it's to late too ask him to confirm than now as he passed away some years ago. The man they did trust was their immediate commander, Lieutenant General Brian Horrocks. http://www.pen-and-sword.co.uk/cgi-bin/uk/1118.html
Father-in-law was very impressed with Edward Fox's portrayal of him in the film "A Bridge too Far" & said he had captured his character perfectly. He also looked very much like him.

PS. Thanks for the link.

The battle off Samar was truly and epic event.  Because of Halsey's irresponsibility, you have a small screen of DD's and DE's going against a formidable surface fleet of BB's CA's and CL's which included none other than the IJN Yamato.  It should have been a totally one sided slaughter.  The planes from the CVE's only had amrament for bombarding shore installations and that's all their pilots were skilled for.  It truly was an amazing event of epic portportions.  Just amazing.

Heck, the Samuel B Roberts was a Destroyer Escort, underpowered, underarmed, intended for antisubmarine duty only.  She charged headlong  against Japanese cruisers and battleships.  Amazing!  And she was ONLY joined by the Johnston and Hoel, both destroyers.  The other DE's and DD's maintained their screens around the CVE's.  So you had 2 destroyers and 1 destroyer escort charging into about a dozen very large Japanese warships.

Once the pilots from the CVE's ran out of ammunition, they began doing dry runs to harass the Japanese ships.

Please forgive the acronyms:

BB - battleship
CA - cruiser
CL - light cruiser
CVE - escort carrier
DD - destroyer
DE - destroyer escort