Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
http://www.flightgear.org/ (Read 442 times)
Oct 26th, 2005 at 7:43pm

neodug   Offline
Colonel
woohoo!

Gender: male
Posts: 163
*****
 
This is a promiseing FREE flight sim. Havent tested it yet. Looks ok! http://www.flightgear.org/
 

&&My Results:&& &&&& &&F-15 Eagle&& &&You are an F-15. Your record in combat is spotless; you've never been defeated. You possess good looks, but are not flashy about it. You prefer to let your reputation do the talking. You are fast, agile, and loud, but reaching the end of your stardom.
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 11:11pm

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
From the looks of it, that sim is a loooooooong way from achieving reality as compared to M$FS. But still, it's a good start considered the new computer technologies that are out there now and available.

Can Gmax be used for making addons for that sim? Speaking of which, does it have an open architecture that allows modifications?

If "Yes" is the answer for both questions, then there is hope for that new sim.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Oct 26th, 2005 at 11:27pm

Jared   Offline
Colonel
I'd rather be flying...
Uniontown, Ohio

Gender: male
Posts: 12621
*****
 
I don't know the answer to your question about gmax, BUT I did notice that they have the SOURCE CODE posted on the web-site which I take to mean that they have an open policy on modifications and what not.. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Oct 27th, 2005 at 12:16am

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Well, I installed it and I tried it. I felt some sense of realism when flying some of the models in FG. However, the controls for the keyboard are really awkward at best.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Oct 27th, 2005 at 5:54am
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Quote:
If "Yes" is the answer for both questions, then there is hope for that new sim.


Because you're going to put your cars into it? Roll Eyes Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Oct 27th, 2005 at 12:15pm

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
/\ /\  Grin /\ /\

It's worth a try. Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Oct 27th, 2005 at 6:21pm

Jared   Offline
Colonel
I'd rather be flying...
Uniontown, Ohio

Gender: male
Posts: 12621
*****
 
I downloaded it last night but haven't had a chance to try it out yet...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Oct 27th, 2005 at 11:38pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
Downloading it now..
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 12:04am

Katahu   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 6920
*****
 
Review of Flight gear

Visuals:

The scenery and visual models look ok and they appear to be decent looking. There are runway and taxi lights as well as some form of autogen. AI aircraft is already included and the loading process doesn't take that much. Surprisingly, with all the AI, light effects, and scenery maxed out with 1280x800 resolution, the frame rates are awsome.

However, the frames are murdered if you apply the detailed clouds.

The key assignments will take a long while to get use to because I still can't figure out which key to press to release the brakes [if any].

Speaking of scenery, there are not that many airports in the scenery. The list is completely short.

My joystick seems to work very well in the sim.

All in all, as a suggestion, don't critisize the sim. FG is still young and, like a little kid in preschool, can still grow in the years to come. I have never flown the models in real life, so I can't tell weather the models act realistically or not [that's probably the job of the pros - Ozzy? Wink ]. All I can say is the sim feels more like a sim and less like a game.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 2:30am

Ivan   Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender: male
Posts: 6058
*****
 
my review: i need a better joystick
 

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Oct 30th, 2005 at 10:29pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
My review: The black screen looked good at first, but lacked a lot of AutoGen.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Oct 30th, 2005 at 10:34pm

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
Never mind. I tinkered with it a little and got it to run.


Not too bad. Reminds me of a mix between X-Plane and FS95. Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 9th, 2005 at 1:27pm

Woozy King   Ex Member
Forza Lazio!!

Gender: male
*****
 
My review: FS9 is better
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 10th, 2005 at 12:17am

flyboy 28   Offline
Colonel
Jacksonville, FL

Posts: 13323
*****
 
Well duh. FS has been in existence for 20+ years. Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 10th, 2005 at 12:07pm
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Well duh. FS has been in existence for 20+ years. Roll Eyes


And it's commercial.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print